There are 561 users in the forums
What do the 9ers need to give up to draft Fleener?
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:00 AM
- ninerfan4life
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,810
I think he'll be there at 30
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:01 AM
- SundayTicket
- Member
- Posts: 5,316
-____- Fleener costs 2 1st rounds and a 3rd?? We might as well throw in our 2013 1st rounder and go for Luck/Griffin
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM
- Magzarillious
- Veteran
- Posts: 739
If he's not there then we trade or draft someone else.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM
- AyYoJoey
- Veteran
- Posts: 112
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
-____- Fleener costs 2 1st rounds and a 3rd?? We might as well throw in our 2013 1st rounder and go for Luck/Griffin
That would be one very low first round (if the niners are as good in 2012) and a third. If we swap picks in the first we still get a first rd pick.
[ Edited by AyYoJoey on Apr 23, 2012 at 9:05 AM ]
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM
- fropwns
- The Last Fronin
- Posts: 27,899
Originally posted by AyYoJoey:Wrong forum, sir.
OK i am on the Fleener Steamer and there is no way in hell that he is on the board when we pick at #30. But i want this guy on our team more then any wide receiver, more then any offensive line man, more then any defensive back. This guy will be a great. With that said, what is a fair trade to move up in the draft? I'm not even sure if another team would make a trade, but it's nice to dream...
I say swap 1st rd picks, this years 3rd and next years 1st for the next big Fleen. (<<< i felt wrong typing that)
I personally believe we will make it back to the NFC championship game, so next years first wont be a high pick anyways.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM
- SundayTicket
- Member
- Posts: 5,316
Originally posted by AyYoJoey:
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
-____- Fleener costs 2 1st rounds and a 3rd?? We might as well throw in our 2013 1st rounder and go for Luck/Griffin
That would be one very low first round (if the niners are as good in 2012) and a third. If we swap picks in the first we still get a first rd pick.
I see that. but your saying fleener is as valuable as the 1st we pick him with, then giving another first, and then a 3rd round pick, (3rd round where we picked up guys like Frank Gore and Kendall hunter).
No Thanks, you need your coffee bro lol
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM
- AyYoJoey
- Veteran
- Posts: 112
my bad.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:10 AM
- sfout
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,443
He'll be there at 30, if he isn't who cares, he is a luxury for us, we would be better of getting a guard, wr or BPA.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:12 AM
- AyYoJoey
- Veteran
- Posts: 112
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
I see that. but your saying fleener is as valuable as the 1st we pick him with, then giving another first, and then a 3rd round pick, (3rd round where we picked up guys like Frank Gore and Kendall hunter).
No Thanks, you need your coffee bro lol
OK so we got a great back and a good backup in the third round. But how good were they when we needed a 3rd down conversion? How important is having a guy you know can pick up a first down. I really think Fleener could step in day 1 and make a difference. He knows the offense.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM
- DaDivaRecieva15
- Veteran
- Posts: 37,964
We picked up Kendall Hunter in the 4th round.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:17 AM
- hofer36
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,257
gots to get me some fleener weiner
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:26 AM
- dj43
- Moderator
- Posts: 38,185
I have written in other threads that Fleener would be a game-changer in the 49er offense. I won't repeat my argument here, only to say that rule changes to protect defenseless receivers make a tall receiver like Fleener an essential part of any truly good receiving corp.
That having been said, I do not believe he is worth spending more than a 3rd to move up to get him. The need for a RG/Center is just as great as a tall receiver, hence, BPA is the best route to travel.
However, in a draft that has a lot of talent on the top end, I would not be surprised if Baalke gives up some mid-round choices to move up for a player they feel will be an impact guy. This team does not have a glaring needs hence an impact guy would be worth sacrificing some "depth" choices if it is the right guy. As much as I like Fleener, I am not certain he is worth giving up what the OP suggests.
That having been said, I do not believe he is worth spending more than a 3rd to move up to get him. The need for a RG/Center is just as great as a tall receiver, hence, BPA is the best route to travel.
However, in a draft that has a lot of talent on the top end, I would not be surprised if Baalke gives up some mid-round choices to move up for a player they feel will be an impact guy. This team does not have a glaring needs hence an impact guy would be worth sacrificing some "depth" choices if it is the right guy. As much as I like Fleener, I am not certain he is worth giving up what the OP suggests.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:30 AM
- DirtyP
- Member
- Posts: 1,210
Fleener is so overrated it is starting to get ridiculous. One of the beat writers recently stated he was the best receiver in the draft and was worth a top ten draft pick. He can't block and he is strictly a straight line speed guy. Not worth trading anything for. He is a role player at best in the NFL.
Apr 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM
- btthepunk
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,304
If we trade up it better be for Michael Floyd.