Originally posted by cciowa:
I know nothing about college football, though i do like marvin mcnutt.this sounds like it is very good but do you think we need to spend a draft pick on a tight end sometime in the draft. this is NOT a fleener question
While exluding Fleener, I dont think there is a tight end in the draft better than Delaine Wlaker. I dont see us keeping more than 3 TE's. So no, we dont need to draft a tight end this year at all, it would be a luxury pick, and maybe not a smart choice at all. No tight end besides Fleener would make the field in any other role than special teams. Just IMO.
Originally posted by nickbradley:
Pretty good - I like a trade-up in the 2nd for a RG. I would take Randle or Jeffery before Hill though - just my preference
Thanks N.B., I'm starting to resepect your opinions on players, much like I do with M.D. and OTC.
But if those three wideouts are on the board at #30, which is a very real possibility, Hill would be my pick all day, obviously not based on production but on potential in the pros. Hill, followed by Randle and then Jeffery. Randle seems very similar to Crabtree, does everything good but not great. And Jeffery looks like a posession receiver at the most. Hill, has the size of Jeffrey, but his speed and vert measurables are outrageous. Would love to see Smith throw it up to him all day in the corner of the redzone. But he is a gifted blocker as well. Just my two cents.