Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by Alkasquawlik:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Who the hell is solid...? We don't have anybody that ranks higher then a #2 WR. And the not m any so defenses can key on them statement....we only have x amount of guys out at a time. Whether its 1 WR, twins, trips...whatever nobody is very good. Vernon is the best player that catches balls on this team.
Yes Jim loves running double TE's because of versatility but also because we had nothing at WR. Davis and Walker are a better duo then Crabs and ?. Walker is fine as the #2 and probably will be resigned for a decent price.
Lets be honest this famed double TE force from NE didnt bring home s**t this year. And as much as I want a RZ target, I want a guy who can go deep and eat yards all day.
VD is solid, I consider him a receiving threat, just like I would consider Fleener a receiving threat as well.
I don't think Walker will come back, that's the thing. I could see him being a team player and coming back, or I could see him wanting a true starting role and leaving in FA next offseason, and then we would be without the option of running double TEs.
Harbaugh ran double TE sets at Stanford as well, so it's not like he was forced to this season just because we had a lack of playmakers at receiver.
Go deep and eat yards? May I introduce you to arguably the greatest deep ball threat that's ever played...Randy Moss...?
Walker is good but he is not a #1 guy, he's another guy overvalued on the zone. And Byham is coming back and he can do whatever we need him to.
Banking on Moss is dangerous, and he is only here on a short deal. Like most loved Edwards last year for the same attributes...didnt work for us.
Burning first round picks on guys who are not starters is bad, we are good but aren't that good to waste high picks for depth. If we run with 1 TE Vernon get's the nod, not Fleener. If we run with 1 WR could rookie x, get the nod...possibly yes. And remember Crabs is running out of time on his contract as well...and he will not be back, that I can say with certainty.
I'm glad to see I am not alone on this point. I can't tell you how much hell I've taken for making this point. Some seem to think we are going to actually feature (start) 2 TE's as our main offensive set. And its almost blasphemous to suggest otherwise around these parts. BTW, I maintain that we should draft a WR - Hill - in the 1st.
[ Edited by 9ersLiferInChicago on Mar 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM ]