If Richardson makes it out of the top 15 picks, would you trade up to get him? - Page 2

Feb 22, 2012 at 21:38:50

#16

Wodwo
Veteran
Posts: 7,681

He's sexy. I want him.

Too bad it's totally unrealistic.

Feb 22, 2012 at 22:21:41

#17

dhp318
Veteran
Posts: 2,518

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
It would cost the Niners a 2nd and 3rd at least to move up from 30 to 16. Just not worth it for a running back.

Well perhaps he's available at a lower draft pick, wouldn't totally surprise me.

Although in retrospect, I wouldn't trade up for a running back, I change my mind. 3rd round picks can be money, and we need all the help we can get.

[ Edited by dhp318 on Feb 22, 2012 at 22:22:09 ]

Feb 22, 2012 at 23:04:24

#18

m_brockalexander
Veteran
Posts: 8,237

Just last year, his 'Bama teammate was the Heisman Trophy winner and he didn't get picked till the 28th pick. RB's are not valued the same in the new NFL. Anything is possible.......

Feb 23, 2012 at 00:32:31

#19

hofer36
Veteran
Posts: 5,670

not after giving gire an extension..if richardson falls to #30 take him

Feb 23, 2012 at 01:57:50

#20

IdahoNiner
Veteran
Posts: 3,533

If he fell, then yes take him. Trade up no thanks.

Although im not against trading up per say into the second or third for a target guy....but it just costs too much to move up in the first

Feb 23, 2012 at 03:01:35

#21

TheRambler
Veteran
Posts: 19,439

Oh hai, another overrated SEC player who will be overwhelmingly meh in the NFL.

Feb 23, 2012 at 07:45:58

#22

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 4,462

No, not at all.

Feb 23, 2012 at 09:19:02

#23

HoneyBadger49er
Veteran
Posts: 19,033

Frank Gore, Kendall Hunter all day in 2012