Originally posted by OnTheClock:
It is well understood at this point that we did not take a BPA strategy and did not pick for value. Instead we searched for one specific player, basically, and took him at the spot we saw fit. This is why it took very little time for us to get picks in, as it was already pre-determined the one guy we were taking.
I don't like this strategy, because essentially it strays from ones board. It's risky. We'll see if Baalke's risk is rewarded, but we won't know for at least a year or so how that's going.
You assume that the guys they picked were not rated the highest on their board. Unless, of course, you saw their draft board.
[ Edited by RedWaltz24 on Apr 30, 2011 at 17:29:22 ]
. After looking at the board Parcell's put together for ESPN, I know that there are different opinions on many of these players.