trade down to #4 would be worth it

elguapo · 2011-04-28T08:49:00-07:00

Take pp and then stanzi in the third. We get probably the best player in the draft and then get a development qb that did well from a pro system and a smart player that harbaugh could coach. Our pass rush could try to be addressed after round three or through fa. I think this would be worth it to get petersen.....would you make this move or be ok with it if balke did it?

Apr 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM

Sjceruti
Veteran
Posts: 1,528

Depends what we'd have to give up.

We have many needs which is why I'd rather trade down and accumulate picks.

Apr 28, 2011 at 8:55 AM

drake49er
Veteran
Posts: 975

I personally would prefer to trade back if miller or peterson isn't there. We have too many holes to fill to trade up.

Apr 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM

elguapo
Veteran
Posts: 26,383

Assuming we dwal for our 2nd and maybe a six.....not too sure the draft value chart equals a 2 and a 6but assuming we lose a second roundvpick i feel its worth it for this player

Apr 28, 2011 at 9:05 AM

Jwalk
Member
Posts: 59

Originally posted by elguapo:
Assuming we dwal for our 2nd and maybe a six.....not too sure the draft value chart equals a 2 and a 6but assuming we lose a second roundvpick i feel its worth it for this player

That would be trade up to #4 and yeah it would cost us a 2nd round pick and we get back a 4th or 5th. I`d rather stay put and grab prince, or maybe even trade back a few spots and still take Prince. That 2nd rd pick is potentially an impact player. I would hate to trade away a pick that could land a possible starter.

Apr 28, 2011 at 10:37 AM

SFL49ER
Veteran
Posts: 4,952

Originally posted by Jwalk:
Originally posted by elguapo:
Assuming we dwal for our 2nd and maybe a six.....not too sure the draft value chart equals a 2 and a 6but assuming we lose a second roundvpick i feel its worth it for this player

That would be trade up to #4 and yeah it would cost us a 2nd round pick and we get back a 4th or 5th. I`d rather stay put and grab prince, or maybe even trade back a few spots and still take Prince. That 2nd rd pick is potentially an impact player. I would hate to trade away a pick that could land a possible starter.

Unless you're talking about the next Ed Reed type DB

Apr 28, 2011 at 10:48 AM

JoseCortez
Veteran
Posts: 13,751

Why the hell would you trade into the top 5 and pay an unproven rookie millions with no rookie salary salary cap?

Apr 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 122,006

Sure would have been nice to lose that last game against Arizona.

Stupid niners, they even suck at tanking the season.

Apr 28, 2011 at 11:29 AM

zillabeast
Veteran
Posts: 20,042

Originally posted by drake49er:
I personally would prefer to trade back if miller or peterson isn't there. We have too many holes to fill to trade up.

No we don't. We have one, big fat one. Peterson is the guy to fill that hole. IT'S WORTH IT!!!

Apr 28, 2011 at 12:00 PM

Niners23
Veteran
Posts: 344

Originally posted by zillabeast:
Originally posted by drake49er:
I personally would prefer to trade back if miller or peterson isn't there. We have too many holes to fill to trade up.

No we don't. We have one, big fat one. Peterson is the guy to fill that hole. IT'S WORTH IT!!!

If we had only one big hole to fill, we wouldn't have had a 6-10 record - you're dreaming. We need to fill QB, CB, OLB and NT as the main priorities as well as WR, RB, S and others. Don't think for a moment that we're one player from a championship because we're not, and to blow a 2nd rounder this way is nonsensical.

Apr 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM

#10

tjd808185
Veteran
Posts: 26,075

Prince will be a d*mn good corner in this league. No it's not worth it.

You take yourself out of position to pick Ponder or Dalton if they slip, and you fail to address our biggest need which is OLB.

I'm on the PP bandwagon too but not at that price.

Apr 28, 2011 at 12:56 PM

#11

filthyrich49er
Veteran
Posts: 374

Originally posted by Niners23:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Originally posted by drake49er:
I personally would prefer to trade back if miller or peterson isn't there. We have too many holes to fill to trade up.

No we don't. We have one, big fat one. Peterson is the guy to fill that hole. IT'S WORTH IT!!!

If we had only one big hole to fill, we wouldn't have had a 6-10 record - you're dreaming. We need to fill QB, CB, OLB and NT as the main priorities as well as WR, RB, S and others. Don't think for a moment that we're one player from a championship because we're not, and to blow a 2nd rounder this way is nonsensical.

Yeah we have holes but we also have twelve picks. The draft doesn't end after rd 1

Apr 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM

#12

Gore_21
Veteran
Posts: 12,685

To get to 4 we would have to give up like a 3rd and a 4th.

Apr 28, 2011 at 1:25 PM

#13

ElDannMann
Veteran
Posts: 4,689

Originally posted by Gore_21:
To get to 4 we would have to give up like a 3rd and a 4th.

Yeah, we'd have to give up too much. I don't think we're getting Peterson. No way he gets past Arizona if Denver takes Von Miller, which looks like they will.

Apr 28, 2011 at 1:55 PM

#14

Aussie49er
Veteran
Posts: 1,028

Trading up in this draft is a poor option at best