Originally posted by TalkinBoutWILLIS:Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by TalkinBoutWILLIS:
if sadly we owned the first pick overall next year with all this fan talk id rather be the team that takes 3 first round draft picks instead of drafting luck. that would be the most ridiculous trade. idc if luck turns into joe montana id still rather have 3 first rounders instead of him
So you would rather have three 1st than the re-incarnate of Montana (your words, not mine, and obviously hypothetical)?
I mean really?
2012 49ers with Montana re-incarnate (again the above disclaimer) and Harbaugh at coach and you will trade that for three 1st's?
Look all I know is this. Harbaugh has said some pretty remarkable things about Luck. Harbaugh has a good track record with QB's. Harbaugh and Baalke both agree that QB is the most important position on the team. Anything is possible, including Luck busting, but I personally wouldn't have a problem with a ridiculous trade for Luck.
We need a stud QB in a QB driven league. If those 2 feels strongly that Luck is exactly that then I have no problems with showing the guts to do what you feel is necessary.
what usually works out better...a stud qb with nothing around him or a decent quarterback with a bunch of talent around him
You said, and I
idc if luck turns into joe montana id still rather have 3 first rounders instead of him
Thats the only part I had a problem with. I stand by my stance that if Baalke agrees with what Harbaugh has already said and spends big to get him then so be it.
I am not advocating, I believe the likely hood is extremely small, but I wouldn't hate it.
Personally I want to see if Harbaugh can take a lesser touted guy and coach him into a stud. If that happens then 49ers fans should be REAL excited cause Harbaugh is a QB coaching machine and that would bode VERY well in a QB driven league.