Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by Rsrkshn:
Originally posted by teeohh:
Originally posted by Rsrkshn:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
In the end, I think we should trade down and try to land with our second pick, one of the following: Ponder, Dalton, Kaepernick, Mallet (unlikely to be there though), or with our 3rd rounder Stanzi.
I would be most pleased with this strategy if it did land the Niners with the QB they most value. The DL/OLB talent this year seems to be very deep. Some excellent CBs (e.g., Smith) are targeted for later also. Some judicious dealing could easily net the Niners very good talent in all three positions (OLB/DE, CB and QB) over the first two rounds.
The problem is identifying and closing a trade with the right partner. Baalke would really have to earn his keep here. Possibly the Patriots; they have too many picks which they cannot realistically utilize effectively. It may behoove them to move up for an "elite" talent.
Their first second rounder would be sweet
Niners 1st (#7) and 5th (#138), total points = 1,537
for
Patriot's first 1st (#17) and first 2nd (#33), total points = 1530
That would be soooo sweet!
The Niners could kill it with the #17, #33 and #45 picks.
I would love for this to happen. 
I don't want to make any trade with the Pats. Trades they are involved in also includes a dumb or desperate team and that dumb team won't be them.
I just outlined the parameters of the trade . . . either the Patriots agree to do it or they don't.
Point is, do you like the looks of this trade, or not? Meaning three picks in the top 45 versus two. By dropping down 10 picks in the first. That's what has to be looked at rather than who the trading partner is.
Or are you suggesting that ANY trade with the Patriots is, ipso facto, bad? Meaning, if it were with any other team, the trade would be OK, but if it's the Patriots, the same trade would automatically become "no good"? Because, frankly, there's not a whole lot of thinking going on behind that proposition.