49ers pick 7th! | Page 11 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:51 PM

bracus
Veteran
Posts: 427

I've seen waaaaay more pass rushers not pan out then QBs. I'd rather use a 2nd on one. It's gotta be QB. Getting rid of Alex is half the battle, we still need someone to replace him. Getting a project in later rounds is just going to waste the talent we have now.

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:51 PM

#152

chico49erfan
Veteran
Posts: 13,961

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

I would walk around with a rock hard boner all day if we landed Peterson. And then Stanzi in rd. 2.

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:51 PM

#153

Jcool
Veteran
Posts: 43,467

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

what makes Gabbert at top 5 pick?

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:53 PM

#154

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

I would take Mallett personally, buy Peterson also fits a need.

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM

#155

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

what makes Gabbert at top 5 pick?

Because he's good.

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:56 PM

#156

ninerlifer
Veteran
Posts: 17,228

Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by ninerlifer:
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by ninerlifer:
Originally posted by MILFS:
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by bigmike55:
That would be awesome. Who knows, if we get Harbaugh, maybe he can pull some strings and get his boy Luck with a blockbuster trade?

I don't know if that's really the best move honestly. Trading for Luck is going to cost us a bunch of picks in this draft and probably our first rounder next year. I remember everyone was all over Eli Manning, he pulled his stunt and the Chargers got a king's ransom for him. While Luck is better than Manning, my point is that it may not be worth it to trade up for Luck.

I agree. I don't think we should give up this year's picks and next year's picks for an unproven player. I say we trade down and pick up more picks and draft a QB in the 2nd or 3rd round like Stanzi and bring in a veteran QB like Palmer or Orton.

Take a risk! The Giants and Chargers took risks! Got Manning and Rivers! Not bad risks.

Chargers go the better deal and they traded Manning.

I doubt it. Manning has a Super Bowl. Advantage GMen
oh, here comes the killer-argument, the ring...he didnt that much before the ring and he doesnt do much after that.

Yeah I really dont want to argue about it....point is both teams traded for unproven players...and both worked out. Chargers got a roided out Merriman that made it advantage Chargers....till Eli won a ring (also a few good seasons sprikled in).

Jan 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM

#157

communist
Veteran
Posts: 12,141

Originally posted by Genius1310:
CB please! Our D is getting torched too often. Trade for a #1 QB, draft our future #1 in a later round.
CB all the way.
Pass rush isn't horrible, we get pressure. if it were the case, our CBs would look better.
Pass D IS horrible.

Originally posted by chico49erfan:

I would walk around with a rock hard boner all day if we landed Peterson. And then Stanzi in rd. 2.

way too high for ricky...i hope that locker falls down.

[ Edited by communist on Jan 2, 2011 at 17:59:49 ]

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:00 PM

#158

GNS1310
Veteran
Posts: 3,646

So its agreed, pass D > pass rush? BS
Our front 7 > our back 4
---IMO---

[ Edited by Genius1310 on Jan 2, 2011 at 18:00:59 ]

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:04 PM

#159

TheGoldenState
Member
Posts: 1,687

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

Whats awesome is none of those Top 6 picks need a CB. Denver might but I think they have bigger needs

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:04 PM

#160

ninerlifer
Veteran
Posts: 17,228

Originally posted by Genius1310:
So its agreed, pass D > pass rush? BS
Our front 7 > our back 4
---IMO---

Patterson or Prince would be pretty sick.

Move Nate Clements to FS.

That is a sick as hell D.

BUT,

We are gonna need a QB. Because I dont see the CBA digned anytime soon, so no Free Agency before the draft.

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:04 PM

#161

ninertico
Veteran
Posts: 10,259

Franchise QB trumps all. Therefore it will be between Newton, Gabbert or Mallett IMO.

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:05 PM

#162

Ninerbowl6
Veteran
Posts: 800

Originally posted by escobar49:

This!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:05 PM

#163

communist
Veteran
Posts: 12,141

Originally posted by Genius1310:
So its agreed, pass D > pass rush? BS
Our front 7 > our back 4
---IMO---

i dont know what u see but we dont create any constant pressure on the qb, besides justin smith...

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:08 PM

#164

Jcool
Veteran
Posts: 43,467

Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

what makes Gabbert at top 5 pick?

Because he's good.

He is an NFL QB? Remember Chase Daniel?

Jan 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM

#165

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I've got the Niners projected to take Peterson at number 7 overall.

Won't he be long gone by then?

It depends on how the draft falls, how fast he runs at the combine/campus workout, etc. Generally, CB's are not drafted high.

Since there are a number of QB hungry teams in front of the Niners who project to select a QB: Carolina, Cincinnati, Arizona, it simply takes three other non-QB's to be taken before SF for Peterson to fall.

I project:
1. Car- Luck
2. Denver- Bowers
3. Bills- Fairley
4. Cincinnati- Gabbert
5. Cards- Newton
6. Browns- Green

In this scenario, the Niners are on the clock with Peterson as an option.

Mad, I don't thiink Cincinati goes QB. Carson has been playing alot better.