http://www.footballsfuture.com/2010/nflmockdraft.html
1A- Haden
1B Spiller
I personally like it. 2 dynamic explosive players at need positions.
BUT only if we can pick up a RT in free agency before the draft
There are 200 users in the forums
Interesting Draft....
- 1 2
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM
- northshore
- Veteran
- Posts: 89
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:50 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
RB is NOT a need position
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:52 AM
- YourHuckleberry
- Member
- Posts: 5,107
No OL? I'd hang myself.
Our CB's are good, we don't need to draft one in the 1st round.
Our CB's are good, we don't need to draft one in the 1st round.
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 45,718
HELL YES!!!!!!!!! that would be a dream 1st rd
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,604
I would like that draft.
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:56 AM
- northshore
- Veteran
- Posts: 89
I see Spiller as a return guy more than a pure RB. and that IS a need.
Like I said, I would only be happy with this IF we were to solidify our line via FA first.
i like our BD's also but we were in the bottom 5 for pass defense... The names are there but the numbers dont lie.
Like I said, I would only be happy with this IF we were to solidify our line via FA first.
i like our BD's also but we were in the bottom 5 for pass defense... The names are there but the numbers dont lie.
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM
- AB81Rules
- Veteran
- Posts: 32,814
wouldnt mind it, but rather have Haden and a OT like Davis or OG Iupati. Or both OL players and get a CB in rd 2 like Cox or Dowling.
Jan 6, 2010 at 11:58 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
Originally posted by northshore:
I see Spiller as a return guy more than a pure RB. and that IS a need.
Like I said, I would only be happy with this IF we were to solidify our line via FA first.
i like our BD's also but we were in the bottom 5 for pass defense... The names are there but the numbers dont lie.
a Returner is not a 1st round need
Jan 6, 2010 at 12:00 PM
- northshore
- Veteran
- Posts: 89
Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by northshore:
I see Spiller as a return guy more than a pure RB. and that IS a need.
Like I said, I would only be happy with this IF we were to solidify our line via FA first.
i like our BD's also but we were in the bottom 5 for pass defense... The names are there but the numbers dont lie.
a Returner is not a 1st round need
Agreed. but it sure would be fun watching him as our returner. it would solidify 1/3 of the game for us
Jan 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM
- SybErkRimInAL
- Veteran
- Posts: 59,184
Jan 6, 2010 at 12:06 PM
- DaveWilcox
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,717
No OT=Bad Draft
Jan 6, 2010 at 12:10 PM
- Karma
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,165
The Spiller bandwagon is getting crowded, and I admit that the thought of having a dynamic returner and an occasional scat back is intriguing, but it just wouldn't be the smartest move. We NEED a RT, help in the secondary, and an OG to push Baas and Rachal. We can't take a luxury pick like Spiller until those needs are met. Besides, there are a number of exciting return prospects that can be had in the 4th round back.
Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM
- 4089er
- Veteran
- Posts: 110
Originally posted by AB83Rules:b
wouldnt mind it, but rather have Haden and a OT like Davis or OG Iupati. Or oth OL players and get a CB in rd 2 like Cox or Dowling.
That would an awesome start for rds. 1 & 2, then BPA for kr/pr, olb/pass r, s. [/u]
Jan 6, 2010 at 12:51 PM
- j3xperience
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,068
Originally posted by northshore:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by northshore:
I see Spiller as a return guy more than a pure RB. and that IS a need.
Like I said, I would only be happy with this IF we were to solidify our line via FA first.
i like our BD's also but we were in the bottom 5 for pass defense... The names are there but the numbers dont lie.
a Returner is not a 1st round need
Agreed. but it sure would be fun watching him as our returner. it would solidify 1/3 of the game for us
that results in tedd ginn jr. ask miami how that turned out. oh btw, picking him before willis i might add.
Jan 6, 2010 at 4:31 PM
- domesik
- Veteran
- Posts: 429
Originally posted by Karma:
The Spiller bandwagon is getting crowded, and I admit that the thought of having a dynamic returner and an occasional scat back is intriguing, but it just wouldn't be the smartest move. We NEED a RT, help in the secondary, and an OG to push Baas and Rachal. We can't take a luxury pick like Spiller until those needs are met. Besides, there are a number of exciting return prospects that can be had in the 4th round back.
So we will REACH early for thos positions and ignore better players that will be on the board.
OK?
- 1 2