I like both Tolbert and Starks more than Jacobs.
Jacobs is not going to get the majority of the carries unless Bradshaw gets hurt. That's something we know.
The RB situations in SD and GB are still unknown. Matthews and Grant are the presumptive starters, but that's just a guess. Both Tolbert and Starks still have a very good chance of being getting the majority of carries on their team.
I'd rather roll the dice with Tolbert and Starks, hoping one of them turns into a solid weekly start, than go with Jacobs, who I know is always going to play second fiddle to Bradshaw.
There are 863 users in the forums
Would you trade B. Jacobs for M. Tolbert & J. Starks?
Would you trade B. Jacobs for M. Tolbert & J. Starks?
Aug 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM
- TheFunkyChicken
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,364
Aug 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM
- jrg
- Veteran
- Posts: 166,549
uh...yeah
Aug 28, 2011 at 11:12 PM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,920
hell yeah
Aug 28, 2011 at 11:18 PM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285
there is no doubt yes
Aug 29, 2011 at 12:09 PM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,444
YEP
Aug 29, 2011 at 1:41 PM
- Neener
- Veteran
- Posts: 147
Tolbert > Jacobs. Stark = Jacobs. So yeah I'll do it.
Aug 29, 2011 at 3:16 PM
- DaManRathman
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,877
Doooo eeeetttttttt
Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM
- ninerlifer
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,237
Brandon Jacobs>Mike Tolbert
Brandon Jacobs>James Starks
but
Both of them obviously gets more production than just the one.
Brandon Jacobs>James Starks
but
Both of them obviously gets more production than just the one.