**UFC/MMA Thread** | Page 90 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Kolohe · 2007-04-26T23:19:04-07:00

Man where do I start. As a Penn fan, I gotta say that I'm a little disappointed in his coaching so far. IMO, it looks like hes not taking it very seriously, only when it comes down to the fight. Than when its fight day, his fighters aren't listening to him in the Octagon. Right now Team Pulver is up 4-0, Team Penn really has to get there sh*t together. I really think Nate Diaz will win this thing, thats my pick. Anybody see that guy talking s**t tonight how he fought 5 guys and knocked them all out?? F**K'N BS!!!!

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:37 AM

#1336

Hollywood49er
Veteran
Posts: 5,287

Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by XAnGeLicDiAbLoX:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

That is tooo true. When they trade shots it's exciting, but when they go to the ground....

not when it's two great grapplers!!!

This is exciting to watch???

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:37 AM

#1337

49erfeeeever808
Veteran
Posts: 31,326

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.

Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

jiu-jitsu fighters.

wrestlers.

ground-n-pound specialists.

....i've seen a lot of street fights go the the ground too.

(but to each his own)

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:38 AM

#1338

Hollywood49er
Veteran
Posts: 5,287

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by XAnGeLicDiAbLoX:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

That is tooo true. When they trade shots it's exciting, but when they go to the ground....

not when it's two great grapplers!!!

This is exciting to watch???

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM

#1339

Hollywood49er
Veteran
Posts: 5,287

Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.

Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

jiu-jitsu fighters.

wrestlers.

ground-n-pound specialists.

....i've seen a lot of street fights go the the ground too.

(but to each his own)

Thats when everyone starts yelling let them get up and fight.

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:41 AM

#1340

LumpiaJeff
Veteran
Posts: 51,513

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by XAnGeLicDiAbLoX:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

That is tooo true. When they trade shots it's exciting, but when they go to the ground....

not when it's two great grapplers!!!

This is exciting to watch???

Hell yes this is exciting to watch. But I can see how some of the fights can get boring when it goes to the ground (Lyoto Machida

)

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:42 AM

#1341

49erfeeeever808
Veteran
Posts: 31,326

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by XAnGeLicDiAbLoX:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

That is tooo true. When they trade shots it's exciting, but when they go to the ground....

not when it's two great grapplers!!!

This is exciting to watch???

yes.

....if your opinion is different. that's fine. don't go off bashing other people's opinion.

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM

#1342

49erfeeeever808
Veteran
Posts: 31,326

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.

Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

jiu-jitsu fighters.

wrestlers.

ground-n-pound specialists.

....i've seen a lot of street fights go the the ground too.

(but to each his own)

Thats when everyone starts yelling let them get up and fight.

depends what they're doing.

are they lying there making out? (then yeah i agree)

or is one guy mounting the other and throwing bombs at his face? (then no)

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:46 AM

#1343

SybErkRimInAL
Veteran
Posts: 59,185

watching one guy set up a submission and the other guy falling for it is exciting. Or when they just keep escaping submissions. IMO, that's exciting. Just as exciting as striking if not more.

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:46 AM

#1344

49erKing
Veteran
Posts: 18,792

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

Does this change your mind? Yes it ends up on the ground but holy damn :)

Tom Selleck vs. Japanese Ogre

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:48 AM

#1345

49erfeeeever808
Veteran
Posts: 31,326

Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

Does this change your mind? Yes it ends up on the ground but holy damn :)

Tom Selleck vs. Japanese Ogre

that's one of the best fights ever.

selleck vs. ogre!!!!

[ Edited by 49erfeeeever808 on Jul 7, 2008 at 11:50 AM ]

Jul 7, 2008 at 11:48 AM

#1346

SybErkRimInAL
Veteran
Posts: 59,185

Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
It was a great fight. I had Forrest win 3 rounds to 2.

yea, and round 2 was a 10-8 rounds since forrest dominated the entire round. I think it was the 2nd??? The one where he was on top of Jackson the whole round.

yea i could see how you would give it a 10-8 round. It just seems like Jackson doesn't do too well being on the bottom.
As for the other posters saying that Rampage should've won, I watched the fight twice and Forrest did control the whole fight. Rampage was looking for that KO punch and wasn't all that successful. Yea, he did rock Forrest a couple times, but Forrest was already winning the whole round before that. Like I said, I had Forrest win 3/5 rounds. When he was on top, you guys said he wasn't doing anything and didnt finish off Rampage. Rampage has a steel chin (unless Wanderlei was kneeing it), but he didn't do crap while he was on his back either. That point goes to Forrest for controlling it on the ground.

This is why is the UFC sucks balls, who fights on their back.
Sorry, give me BOXING over 2 grown ass men dry humping each other, ANYDAY!

Does this change your mind? Yes it ends up on the ground but holy damn :)

Tom Selleck vs. Japanese Ogre

haha, i remember watching that. pretty crazy.

Jul 8, 2008 at 11:35 PM

#1347

TonyStarks
Veteran
Posts: 62,923

You know who beat the new world champ before?

Ooooooooooooh yeaaaaaaaaah bit***es

Jul 9, 2008 at 12:21 AM

#1348

NinerScout
Info N/A

Originally posted by TonyStarks:
You know who beat the new world champ before?

Ooooooooooooh yeaaaaaaaaah bit***es

What's he doing now? Is he in a new league?

Jul 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM

#1349

TonyStarks
Veteran
Posts: 62,923

I dunno.

Tito's probably the richest MMA fighter.Especially spending Jenna Jamesons millions.

Jul 9, 2008 at 11:22 AM

#1350

SybErkRimInAL
Veteran
Posts: 59,185

He's outta the UFC and you will most likely not see him back. His most recent fight against Machida was the last of his contract. Dana White hates him so don't expect to see him back in the UFC. If he decides to keep fighting, it'll most likely be in the WEC.