Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
i just don't get the arguments. ppl acting like willy hit 30 hrs so now he's maybe get 20. yeah, don't think so. if he hits 20 it's cuz he's having a down year compared to last. not the park. MLB was played a long time, and it just so happens the all time best HR season was here, we also led the league in homers recently. that flies in the face of the park being a limiting factor. it isn't. that's more in the mind, than it is in reality.
I am not saying you can't hit homeruns at AT&T. Yes, there are several circumstances going into that argument beyond just the park and one can have an unusually exceptional year. However, historically and as the norm, that is the perception and mostly reality. Whole bunch of players said that over many years, so are the whole bunch of executives and so on. Do you think all of that is bull, imagined or mind twisting? The park was speciously built with the premium on attendance in mind to help pay for it, and as the coincidental result, the premium on pitching and D. Having one player who could not have been bothered with its dimensions had only help in having advantage over sluggers playing in the yards where everything gone out. How many homeruns had Bonds and other Giants players lost themselves here. Why would announcers constantly say in games this shot would have been out in any other park? As a matter of fact, if the Giants ownership group were not "worrying" about paying 20M loan interest on the park and put a few decent players around Kent, Bonds and Burks row, and a bit better pitching staff, the Giants would have won several more titles before 2010. Remember, since Bonds hung them up, the Giants had decreased the park dimensions already for their own good.
[ Edited by tl57 on Dec 9, 2024 at 3:49 PM ]