Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 318 users in the forums

Golden State Warriors Talk

May 16, 2025 at 5:54 PM
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
May 16, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Originally posted by ads_2006:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by ads_2006:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Dray talking championship doe

Steph injury doe or else it 95% was

Shanahan at the game last night, no surprise 4th quarter choke
Lol at 95%. I do think they would have beaten Minnesota but seriously doubt they would beat OKC, Boston, or Cleveland

All three of those teams might get bounced. If they do, makes Steph injury 10000x more worse

Only one of these teams left

absolutely brutal for curry with how things are shaping up
May 16, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.
May 17, 2025 at 6:47 AM
  • POG_
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 98,702
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.

I don't know about that last part. Edwards was invisible the first chunk of the series and we still didn't look great. Wolves showed up, Randle looked superhuman. I got nothing bad to say about them.
May 17, 2025 at 10:05 AM
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.

I don't know about that last part. Edwards was invisible the first chunk of the series and we still didn't look great. Wolves showed up, Randle looked superhuman. I got nothing bad to say about them.
I agree. It's just being a homer and illogical to say that the Warriors would definitely have won if Curry had played. Minnesota crushed the Lakers and the Dubs squeaked by Houston in 7. It's not like we were by far the superior team.

I think it could have gone either way to be honest. But to win they would have needed better contribution from the bench and from Podziemski
May 17, 2025 at 6:32 PM
randle was amazing and the reason wolves won IMO. We had no answer for him. Edwards seemed hobbled by his ankle to a degree and wasn't efficient it seemed.
May 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.

I don't know about that last part. Edwards was invisible the first chunk of the series and we still didn't look great. Wolves showed up, Randle looked superhuman. I got nothing bad to say about them.

Yes, Edwards is Tinder Woofs best player. If he's not on the floor, Randle likely doesn't go off the way he did. Even when Edwards isn't being Edwards, he's the guy (not Randle) you're really concerned about.

Originally posted by ads_2006:
randle was amazing and the reason wolves won IMO. We had no answer for him. Edwards seemed hobbled by his ankle to a degree and wasn't efficient it seemed.

Randle may have played better in this particular match up and he is very good, but Dubs would rather much have to face a Minny team w/out Edwards than Randle. And yes, Randle was the one playing better in this match up so we'll say he was their best player... you remove either one and Dubs likely win that round w/out SC

There were times in each game that they came within a couple of points before getting beat in the end w/out SC and they had all their guys
May 18, 2025 at 10:11 AM
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.

I don't know about that last part. Edwards was invisible the first chunk of the series and we still didn't look great. Wolves showed up, Randle looked superhuman. I got nothing bad to say about them.

Yes, Edwards is Tinder Woofs best player. If he's not on the floor, Randle likely doesn't go off the way he did. Even when Edwards isn't being Edwards, he's the guy (not Randle) you're really concerned about.

Originally posted by ads_2006:
randle was amazing and the reason wolves won IMO. We had no answer for him. Edwards seemed hobbled by his ankle to a degree and wasn't efficient it seemed.

Randle may have played better in this particular match up and he is very good, but Dubs would rather much have to face a Minny team w/out Edwards than Randle. And yes, Randle was the one playing better in this match up so we'll say he was their best player... you remove either one and Dubs likely win that round w/out SC

There were times in each game that they came within a couple of points before getting beat in the end w/out SC and they had all their guys
The Warriors got smoked in 3 games. Minnesota was clearly the better team after game 1 and the Dubs had no answer for Randle. Edwards wasn't even at his best as well.

Would the Warriors have beaten Minnesota with Curry? Perhaps. But it is laughable to say that for sure they would have won. Podziemski didnt shoot well at all, the bench was invisible most of the time, and only Kuminga played up to his potential.

The Warriors have a lot of work if they hope to ever be realistic title contenders again.
May 19, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.

I don't know about that last part. Edwards was invisible the first chunk of the series and we still didn't look great. Wolves showed up, Randle looked superhuman. I got nothing bad to say about them.

Yes, Edwards is Tinder Woofs best player. If he's not on the floor, Randle likely doesn't go off the way he did. Even when Edwards isn't being Edwards, he's the guy (not Randle) you're really concerned about.

Originally posted by ads_2006:
randle was amazing and the reason wolves won IMO. We had no answer for him. Edwards seemed hobbled by his ankle to a degree and wasn't efficient it seemed.

Randle may have played better in this particular match up and he is very good, but Dubs would rather much have to face a Minny team w/out Edwards than Randle. And yes, Randle was the one playing better in this match up so we'll say he was their best player... you remove either one and Dubs likely win that round w/out SC

There were times in each game that they came within a couple of points before getting beat in the end w/out SC and they had all their guys
The Warriors got smoked in 3 games. Minnesota was clearly the better team after game 1 and the Dubs had no answer for Randle. Edwards wasn't even at his best as well.

Would the Warriors have beaten Minnesota with Curry? Perhaps. But it is laughable to say that for sure they would have won. Podziemski didnt shoot well at all, the bench was invisible most of the time, and only Kuminga played up to his potential.

The Warriors have a lot of work if they hope to ever be realistic title contenders again.

Look on the bright side. At least Curry didn't need to force the issue and try and play. He might have ended up with a more serious hamstring tear.
[ Edited by CatchMaster80 on May 20, 2025 at 8:21 AM ]
May 20, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

There are a lot of illogical / idiotic comments (AND people) on TV / radio. SC is our best player and significantly changes the way the whole team plays when he's missing...even Kerr is all F'd up in the head tweaking out lineups like a dope fiend junky

Take out Tinder Woofs best player (Edwards) and they're definitely losing to the Dubs even w/out Curry.

I don't know about that last part. Edwards was invisible the first chunk of the series and we still didn't look great. Wolves showed up, Randle looked superhuman. I got nothing bad to say about them.

Yes, Edwards is Tinder Woofs best player. If he's not on the floor, Randle likely doesn't go off the way he did. Even when Edwards isn't being Edwards, he's the guy (not Randle) you're really concerned about.

Originally posted by ads_2006:
randle was amazing and the reason wolves won IMO. We had no answer for him. Edwards seemed hobbled by his ankle to a degree and wasn't efficient it seemed.

Randle may have played better in this particular match up and he is very good, but Dubs would rather much have to face a Minny team w/out Edwards than Randle. And yes, Randle was the one playing better in this match up so we'll say he was their best player... you remove either one and Dubs likely win that round w/out SC

There were times in each game that they came within a couple of points before getting beat in the end w/out SC and they had all their guys
The Warriors got smoked in 3 games. Minnesota was clearly the better team after game 1 and the Dubs had no answer for Randle. Edwards wasn't even at his best as well.

Would the Warriors have beaten Minnesota with Curry? Perhaps. But it is laughable to say that for sure they would have won. Podziemski didnt shoot well at all, the bench was invisible most of the time, and only Kuminga played up to his potential.

The Warriors have a lot of work if they hope to ever be realistic title contenders again.

Welp. For starters, JB will already be here to start the off / regular season vs everyone trying to fit in midway... chemistry wasn't really there and Kerr mixing lineups (practically all year) like a madman ... Dubs already added their very expensive piece, I'm not sure what the team gonna look like next season, but maybe JK stays and they add a vet big worth a damn

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Look on the bright side. At least Curry didn't need to force the issue and try and play. He might have ended up with a more serious hamstring tear.

Yeah big time. Hopefully he heals up 100% and full go next season. Someone really does need to step up when he's on the bench or getting days off tho. I wonder who stays and who else Dubs can afford
May 20, 2025 at 5:03 PM
May 20, 2025 at 7:17 PM
And then there's this guy's opinion (JK / Tracy McGrady comparison)
https://nbaanalysis.net/golden-state-warriors-could-trade-away-the-next-tracy-mcgrady-ex-star-warns-on-the-cusp/



What about this? Some will argue (keep Dray) and would rather get rid of youngsters in a trade, but I'm not in that camp...
https://nbaanalysis.net/vernon-maxwell-claims-draymond-green-and-golden-state-warriors-have-reached-the-end-of-the-road-its-time/
May 20, 2025 at 9:07 PM
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
And then there's this guy's opinion (JK / Tracy McGrady comparison)
https://nbaanalysis.net/golden-state-warriors-could-trade-away-the-next-tracy-mcgrady-ex-star-warns-on-the-cusp/



What about this? Some will argue (keep Dray) and would rather get rid of youngsters in a trade, but I'm not in that camp...
https://nbaanalysis.net/vernon-maxwell-claims-draymond-green-and-golden-state-warriors-have-reached-the-end-of-the-road-its-time/

Scorer but not a winner, not a bad description
May 21, 2025 at 11:02 PM
  • boast
  • Hella Fame
  • Posts: 155,730
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
And then there's this guy's opinion (JK / Tracy McGrady comparison)
https://nbaanalysis.net/golden-state-warriors-could-trade-away-the-next-tracy-mcgrady-ex-star-warns-on-the-cusp/



What about this? Some will argue (keep Dray) and would rather get rid of youngsters in a trade, but I'm not in that camp...
https://nbaanalysis.net/vernon-maxwell-claims-draymond-green-and-golden-state-warriors-have-reached-the-end-of-the-road-its-time/

Kerr thinks he's more Aaron Gordon than TMac. TK just interviewed Kerr on his podcast today and Kerr explained the Kuminga situation. said Kuminga needs the ball in his hands a lot to be successful. but also said the ball needs to be in Steph's or Jimmy's hands for the TEAM to be successful.

I've been asked to win, and right now, he's not a guy who I can say I'm gonna play 38 minutes with the roster that we have — Steph [Curry], and Jimmy [Butler], and Draymond [Green] — and put the puzzle together that way and expect to win," Kerr said. "Doesn't mean he's not a really good player. Doesn't mean he's not talented. It just means with the fit and with the that roster we have, it is tricky, there's no question.

"On a team with Steph and Jimmy, I mean, honestly, Steph is going to have the ball, Jimmy's going to have the ball, and so the fit is tricky, there's no question," Kerr said. "And what JK and I have talked about a lot, and what we've tried to really hammer home with him, is sprint the floor and rebound and be complementary to those guys, and that's how you can find your role and find more minutes.

"Hopefully that will click, and we'll find that place where he can start to do those things, and rebound, and get loose balls and be a high-energy possession guy, like Shawn Marion, like Aaron Gordon — I think those guys are great comps. But young guys take some time to find their place, to figure out the best version of themselves, and I think that process is still happening."
May 22, 2025 at 5:26 PM

Possibly explains a lot
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Instagram
Threads
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone