Originally posted by Bluesbro:
How can you grade a draft when they haven't played yet? I can tell you that the 1981 49er draft was an A+
On here its more of a measure of how different were the picks from the ones posters wanted.
There are 440 users in the forums
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
How can you grade a draft when they haven't played yet? I can tell you that the 1981 49er draft was an A+
.@PFF evaluated the value of each #49ers draft pick by comparing their selection spot to their ranking on the site's big board. Green indicates a steal; red indicates a reach. #NFLDraft pic.twitter.com/H9qZZbjPw6
— 49ers Webzone (@49erswebzone) April 30, 2025
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
.@PFF evaluated the value of each #49ers draft pick by comparing their selection spot to their ranking on the site's big board. Green indicates a steal; red indicates a reach. #NFLDraft pic.twitter.com/H9qZZbjPw6
— 49ers Webzone (@49erswebzone) April 30, 2025
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
i just don't like the methodology. for example, mahomes would be red and will levis you may have a lot of green there. if you want your guy and have conviction, you have to get out in front of the rest of the nfl. if you want to just get all the guys who slide, well a lot of those guys are sliding for reasons. appreciate the share tho
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
.@PFF evaluated the value of each #49ers draft pick by comparing their selection spot to their ranking on the site's big board. Green indicates a steal; red indicates a reach. #NFLDraft pic.twitter.com/H9qZZbjPw6
— 49ers Webzone (@49erswebzone) April 30, 2025
Originally posted by Luckycharms:
I'd give it a B+. These last 2 drafts I think have been there best. Also a quick thought on how we draft as a team.
The ravens and the eagles are the two teams with some historically great drafts. There is a reason for this. In both of these organizations the general manager holds the power over the head coach. They are not looking for players to fit a scheme. They are selecting the best players available and then creating a scheme for their unique skill sets. If the current OC or DC can't do that, they move on. Both Nick Sirianni and John Harbaugh are smart for not being play callers. That way the organization doesn't have to move on from them and can move on from the OC or DC that cannot create a scheme to fit the players that the gm decides to draft.
It is a completely opposite strategy for the 49ers. Kyle Shanahan and the DC hold a lot of power when it comes to selecting players that fit their scheme. They are less willing to change their scheme to fit better players. The organization goes along with it because of how much respect kyle has around the league for being a creative offensive "genius". Hopefully it works out for the 49ers. I really like their draft but this is why they reached on some players and teams like eagles and ravens are less willing to.
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:For a lot of these public big boards, the grading is limited to just tape, pro-days, the combine, and rumors. The 49ers regularly "reach" for guys because they consider things like scheme (prototypes), medicals, interviews, investigations, in addition to tape, pro-days, and the combine.
.@PFF evaluated the value of each #49ers draft pick by comparing their selection spot to their ranking on the site's big board. Green indicates a steal; red indicates a reach. #NFLDraft pic.twitter.com/H9qZZbjPw6
— 49ers Webzone (@49erswebzone) April 30, 2025
Originally posted by genus49:
Pff puts too much into their rankings but I remember when you could grab Harmon in the 3rd, Membou in the 4th and Dart near the bottom of the 7th round based on their rankings.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
i just don't like the methodology. for example, mahomes would be red and will levis you may have a lot of green there. if you want your guy and have conviction, you have to get out in front of the rest of the nfl. if you want to just get all the guys who slide, well a lot of those guys are sliding for reasons. appreciate the share tho
Originally posted by scooterhd:Pick Pos Player - CBB Overall (Forecasters / Evaluators) - PFF Final
PFF had Daniels at 21 so Commanders got a big red line for taking him at 2. Bo Nix? Massive red line. PFF had James Worthy at 69. No good from the Chiefs there.
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
We got a steal with Guard Connor Colby! pshhhh and they say we don't improve the oline at all.
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Luckycharms:
I'd give it a B+. These last 2 drafts I think have been there best. Also a quick thought on how we draft as a team.
The ravens and the eagles are the two teams with some historically great drafts. There is a reason for this. In both of these organizations the general manager holds the power over the head coach. They are not looking for players to fit a scheme. They are selecting the best players available and then creating a scheme for their unique skill sets. If the current OC or DC can't do that, they move on. Both Nick Sirianni and John Harbaugh are smart for not being play callers. That way the organization doesn't have to move on from them and can move on from the OC or DC that cannot create a scheme to fit the players that the gm decides to draft.
It is a completely opposite strategy for the 49ers. Kyle Shanahan and the DC hold a lot of power when it comes to selecting players that fit their scheme. They are less willing to change their scheme to fit better players. The organization goes along with it because of how much respect kyle has around the league for being a creative offensive "genius". Hopefully it works out for the 49ers. I really like their draft but this is why they reached on some players and teams like eagles and ravens are less willing to.
I don't agree with the Eagles and Ravens changing their schemes to fit their players. Can you provide some examples? They do a better job at drafting BPA that's true but at the same time they also take more chances on player's with character concerns. I think the 49ers are high on character and will take those players off the board.