How much are you willing to pay Brock Purdy before letting him go?

Kinda think you need to show what other QBs get per year so we can see the landscape. https://overthecap.com/position/quarterback

Below 40 Million: 4 guys that are not on their rookie contracts.
40-45 Million Per Year: 4
46-50 Million Per Year: 2
51-55 Million Per Year: 8
56-60 Million Per Year: 1
61-65 Million Per Year: 0
65+ Million Per Year: 0

I think i would offer him 50 million which would put him in the top 10 until the next decent QB resigns and then he'll no longer be in the top 10.
https://overthecap.com/position/quarterback
__PRESENT

the big item to me more than the aav is the initial cap hits and when is the OUT

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He's under contract. They don't have to let him go and they don't have to pay him either. They are just choosing to pay him. It should be a very careful contract. With an out for the team. Maybe less guaranteed. 49ers always get burned on big contracts.

Always get burned? lame

Dee_VAH Samuel (injured - wants out), Aiyuk (over paid - injured), Hargrave (injured - bad scheme fit), TW (injuries- declining), Lance (bust).

looks like you don't know the definition of always and how does an injury define a contract?

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He's under contract. They don't have to let him go and they don't have to pay him either. They are just choosing to pay him. It should be a very careful contract. With an out for the team. Maybe less guaranteed. 49ers always get burned on big contracts.

Always get burned? lame

Dee_VAH Samuel (injured - wants out), Aiyuk (over paid - injured), Hargrave (injured - bad scheme fit), TW (injuries- declining), Lance (bust).

don't forget the BEST FB in The NFL... he's overpaid because he is sooooo underused..

B-Rock Steady Purdy isn't being looked at as a franchise QB because of where he was drafted, not a bad weather player, isn't the prototype of a QB, and last but not the least, we have a HC who maybe doubting if B-Rock is really good or is it HIS system?

I have a feeling that KS10 believes 70-30 his system that makes Purdy so his value should no more than be $10M a year.

The Brick after Brick Brothers does not want another Grappy up in Camelot.

Juice is over paid too. Most teams don't even use a FB anymore. He's getting older too.

A Baker Mayfield deal makes sense. 2 years at $30 M per year. A prove it deal. With an out for the team. If he proves it you can pay him more after that. A Dak Prescott deal after that. No question we were much worse with the injuries. Not all on Brock. But still you have to be cautious here. I like Brock. Just saying be cautious.

I like your 30M, but if I was running the show, B-Rock deserves 20 to 25 max per year..

you two would have the worst franchises lol

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He's under contract. They don't have to let him go and they don't have to pay him either. They are just choosing to pay him. It should be a very careful contract. With an out for the team. Maybe less guaranteed. 49ers always get burned on big contracts.

Always get burned? lame

Dee_VAH Samuel (injured - wants out), Aiyuk (over paid - injured), Hargrave (injured - bad scheme fit), TW (injuries- declining), Lance (bust).

looks like you don't know the definition of always and how does an injury define a contract?

I didn't even want to touch that one. Too mentally draining trying to reason with the guy.

Let's just ignore Kittle, Warner contracts. Pretend injuries can be projected and include Lance who had a guaranteed contract like every other rookie.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He's under contract. They don't have to let him go and they don't have to pay him either. They are just choosing to pay him. It should be a very careful contract. With an out for the team. Maybe less guaranteed. 49ers always get burned on big contracts.

Always get burned? lame

Dee_VAH Samuel (injured - wants out), Aiyuk (over paid - injured), Hargrave (injured - bad scheme fit), TW (injuries- declining), Lance (bust).

looks like you don't know the definition of always and how does an injury define a contract?

I didn't even want to touch that one. Too mentally draining trying to reason with the guy.

Let's just ignore Kittle, Warner contracts. Pretend injuries can be projected and include Lance who had a guaranteed contract like every other rookie.

in the Kyle era, this has been the best ran 49ers org in the salary cap era.

After the 2024 season, somehow we have "always" been the worst team in the NFL from top to bottom.

how do these guys continue to post here.. idk

Originally posted by fropwns:
That we have waited so long to have a Quarterback of his caliber to even continue to harangue on about it is insanity. Sign that young man. Let's get to work.

This

Originally posted by captveg:
Where's the "I don't care, it's not my money" option?

Any deal, whether $20m a year or $75m a year, is gonna have easy outs after a couple years to protect the team. Additionally, if he's amazing, there will be easy options to restructure/extend his deal.

The hand wringing over this has been insufferable.

Also this

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

A Baker Mayfield deal makes sense. 2 years at $30 M per year. A prove it deal. With an out for the team. If he proves it you can pay him more after that. A Dak Prescott deal after that. No question we were much worse with the injuries. Not all on Brock. But still you have to be cautious here. I like Brock. Just saying be careful with an out.

Mayfield is a unicorn. He had fallen off the charts but finally came back to play closer to expectations. His current deal represents a guy who, at the time, was considered to be a short-term bridge to a better guy. The fact that he has played well is a bonus. If he were to be extended this off-season, he would be in the $50+ range based on performance.

If you really don't want Purdy or have no faith in him for the future, as your posts suggest, then the starting figure should be in the Kirk Cousins range - $45M/yr.

The most realistic template is the Jordan Love deal - $55M/yr. In three years, when Stroud and the other rookie deals reset, Purdy will look like a bargain.

I don't think BP wants to break the bank for the Niners. His agent is always going to go for the most money because that's what they do. Purdy will make money in other ways. Purdy seems like a guy who will probably buy a John Deere and Toyota franchise and enjoy his bonus check Just kidding. But Purdy knows he needs a good team around him to succeed and I don't think his ego is in the same category as others. I guess we will find out but I think he'll sign a team friendly contract with certain goals that will increase his yearly salary. JMHO As I said we will see……..

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

A Baker Mayfield deal makes sense. 2 years at $30 M per year. A prove it deal. With an out for the team. If he proves it you can pay him more after that. A Dak Prescott deal after that. No question we were much worse with the injuries. Not all on Brock. But still you have to be cautious here. I like Brock. Just saying be careful with an out.

Mayfield is a unicorn. He had fallen off the charts but finally came back to play closer to expectations. His current deal represents a guy who, at the time, was considered to be a short-term bridge to a better guy. The fact that he has played well is a bonus. If he were to be extended this off-season, he would be in the $50+ range based on performance.

If you really don't want Purdy or have no faith in him for the future, as your posts suggest, then the starting figure should be in the Kirk Cousins range - $45M/yr.

The most realistic template is the Jordan Love deal - $55M/yr. In three years, when Stroud and the other rookie deals reset, Purdy will look like a bargain.

Purdy is more proven than Love IMO. Given the cap increases, I think it's going to be closer $60M range but the concession to get out of the contract in 2-3 years for cap flexibility and trade flexibility. JG contract structure could be similar.

It's damn hard to find a franchise QB. They aren't going to get rid of him one year removed from a SB appearance.

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

A Baker Mayfield deal makes sense. 2 years at $30 M per year. A prove it deal. With an out for the team. If he proves it you can pay him more after that. A Dak Prescott deal after that. No question we were much worse with the injuries. Not all on Brock. But still you have to be cautious here. I like Brock. Just saying be careful with an out.

Mayfield is a unicorn. He had fallen off the charts but finally came back to play closer to expectations. His current deal represents a guy who, at the time, was considered to be a short-term bridge to a better guy. The fact that he has played well is a bonus. If he were to be extended this off-season, he would be in the $50+ range based on performance.

If you really don't want Purdy or have no faith in him for the future, as your posts suggest, then the starting figure should be in the Kirk Cousins range - $45M/yr.

The most realistic template is the Jordan Love deal - $55M/yr. In three years, when Stroud and the other rookie deals reset, Purdy will look like a bargain.

Bingo. IMO the market for Purdy is very clear and he's right in there with the 50-55m QB's, and those deals were done before the cap went up. I pegged the Goff 53m deal and you the Love 55m deal so yeah, that sounds right about where his value is. Question is if he wants that value but increased by the % the cap went up this year, or term, or guaranteed money.

the fact that were even talking about this and he's still unsigned is a bad sign for us.

Does anyone remember our last NFC champ game? when after we got our asses whooped in the first half and in the second half at times he put the team on his back and pulled us through so we could win the game and have another chance at a SB. (before dumbass coaching screwed that up again)

BP is by far the most talented and capable QB this team has had in a LONG time. and that is said with full awareness of his shortcomings and weaknesses which EVERY QB in the history of the NFL has had some kind of weakness. no ones perfect. we have no other better option at QB currently on the roster, and do we really think this FO Is capable of landing a better QB with our first draft pick? do we need to talk about TL5?. do we really think a rookie QB would be more capable of taking us back to the SB this year than BP?

BP an his contract should have been priority #1 from the second our season ended. he is what makes this team go now, he is one of the biggest reasons for our recent success and we have no better option. if they don't get this deal done by the end of March it will be very alarming because that will be a sign that the team is going into this with the same method they did with aiyuk and bosa and Trent and look at what that did to us. again if they let this negotiating go into the summer AGAIN the season is tanked, its a wash. don't even watch the games we have no chance if we go through another summer of drama. its a no brainer, get him signed.

Originally posted by BobSacamano69:
the fact that were even talking about this and he's still unsigned is a bad sign for us.

Does anyone remember our last NFC champ game? when after we got our asses whooped in the first half and in the second half at times he put the team on his back and pulled us through so we could win the game and have another chance at a SB. (before dumbass coaching screwed that up again)

BP is by far the most talented and capable QB this team has had in a LONG time. and that is said with full awareness of his shortcomings and weaknesses which EVERY QB in the history of the NFL has had some kind of weakness. no ones perfect. we have no other better option at QB currently on the roster, and do we really think this FO Is capable of landing a better QB with our first draft pick? do we need to talk about TL5?. do we really think a rookie QB would be more capable of taking us back to the SB this year than BP?

BP an his contract should have been priority #1 from the second our season ended. he is what makes this team go now, he is one of the biggest reasons for our recent success and we have no better option. if they don't get this deal done by the end of March it will be very alarming because that will be a sign that the team is going into this with the same method they did with aiyuk and bosa and Trent and look at what that did to us. again if they let this negotiating go into the summer AGAIN the season is tanked, its a wash. don't even watch the games we have no chance if we go through another summer of drama. its a no brainer, get him signed.

the last game of the season isn't even a month old.. relax

lynch just needs to be straight up and tell brock that kyle took frickin jimmy g to the damn superbowl and that's exactly how much the niners are willing to pay, "jimmy g money". take it or leave it!

Originally posted by D0PEMAN:
lynch just needs to be straight up and tell brock that kyle took frickin jimmy g to the damn superbowl and that's exactly how much the niners are willing to pay, "jimmy g money". take it or leave it!

Jimmy G got the "highest paid QB contract" at the time. I'm sure Brock would take it.