Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 193 users in the forums

OTAs/Training Camp 2025

Shop Find 49ers gear online
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,371
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

I'm pulling for this guy to break into the starting lineup. I want that 2nd TE to be able to block Reddick when we play the Eagles.


personally I think Willis is the better guy.

Not ONCE did I understand the damn Latu pick, I just swear they drafted him because they needed a TE. Dude didn't do a damn thing in Bama

To a certain extent, neither did George Kittle at Iowa. So if Kyle saw something in Latu I'd wait for Latu's development. P.S. I think he switched from DE to TE about (I think) halfway into his college career, so it makes sense for anybody not to have seen him do much in college as a TE.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
  • Jcool
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 44,497
Originally posted by Giedi:
To a certain extent, neither did George Kittle at Iowa. So if Kyle saw something in Latu I'd wait for Latu's development. P.S. I think he switched from DE to TE about (I think) halfway into his college career, so it makes sense for anybody not to have seen him do much in college as a TE.

If Kyle saw something in him... He will be cut in a few weeks.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

I'm pulling for this guy to break into the starting lineup. I want that 2nd TE to be able to block Reddick when we play the Eagles.


personally I think Willis is the better guy.

Not ONCE did I understand the damn Latu pick, I just swear they drafted him because they needed a TE. Dude didn't do a damn thing in Bama

To a certain extent, neither did George Kittle at Iowa. So if Kyle saw something in Latu I'd wait for Latu's development. P.S. I think he switched from DE to TE about (I think) halfway into his college career, so it makes sense for anybody not to have seen him do much in college as a TE.

Alabama had copied a lot of the TE plays that we execute. So I think Kyle was pleased to see Latu execute those plays as well as he did. He's extremely raw but all reports show that he is a fast learner. I don't except much his rookie year but I think if he grinds all year and next offseason, we will see a very good player in the making.
Originally posted by tankle104:

HOLY

sorry, i had the caps lock there
  • Jcool
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 44,497
Originally posted by tankle104:

FWIW the depth cart is put out by the PR department not the coaching staff.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,371
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
The ONLY reason you're diminishing arm talent for a freaking NFL QB is because Brock doesn't check that box.

you were the same poster s**tting on the ability to extend plays, Brock does it and you're tight in the pants over it 😂

yeah in a league where there's a hard cap, you'd think you'd want highest possible talent at the most important position in sports. All these QBs are massively overpaid.

fixed

you WILL have to pay the QB. No one cares if you pay Mahomes or Allen a billion dollars. They're worth it. Paying Daniel Jones or Derick Carr $160,000,000 is not a spot any fan should want to be in. Imo you're in NFL purgatory with that s**t.

We should all want the highest level QB possible. Trying to diminish arm talent for a position that literally is about throwing is silly. The only reason someone would think it doesn't matter is a person that knows our current QB lacks that.

but yes to your point as of today he's dirt cheap and we don't have to pay him for a bit.

Why do you do it to Brock then?

On this subject there are different aspects to arm talent. What Z Wilson has, will get you taken 2 overall, and he flat sucks. BP doesn't just complete passes, the ball is money, almost all the time. So accuracy, is surely a part of arm talent, and BP has that in spades. I would rather decent arm strength, with very high accuracy, than an inaccurate cannon.

Arm talent is also the ability to "massage" throws through the outstretched hands of the DL, change arm angles, throw off balance, throw off the wrong foot, know when to loft or bullet a pass, etc. Steve Young (the real one, not Sam Darnold who is Steve Young 2.0) has talked about this a lot. Purdy ABSOLUTELY has that type of arm talent. He showed more of it in his 8 games last year than we've seen in 20+ years since Garcia/Young days. It's not all about velocity or how far a QB can throw.

That's what I don't understand about NY and a few others' who relentlessly attack this aspect of Purdy's ability. They went on and on about how Jimmy didn't have it and we had to have it. Now we have a QB who does have it, and they're complaining that he can't throw it 70 yards. There is literally ONE quarterback who has everything that they're looking for, and that's Mahomes. And I don't even know if Mahomes would be who he is had Kyle drafted him, because is he "a*****e" enough to battle Kyle for that type of freedom? He doesn't need to do that with Reid, because Reid allows much more freedom with his players.

Why are some wishing for a mythical QB? It's weird.

To be devils advocate and argue the the Pro-Trey's crowd point of view -- they want a Patrick Mahomes. They see Trey as possibly somebody who can turn into Patrick. They want that athleticism, intangibles, and just raw power to oblitierate defenses the way Mahomes can. They see that in Trey, if Kyle will just allow Trey some more reps and a faster development. I see Trey as more of Steve Young than Patrick - but that's just me.

The Pro-Purdy side can see the Joe Montana/Drew Brees aspects of Brock's game. I definitely can see Joe's intangibles a bit in Brock Purdy's game. He's one intenlligent QB that makes things happen with both his arm and his mind.

As for me, I say let the chips fall where they may. As how Kyle is allowing it to happen right now. Have Purdy be QB1 and have Trey continue to develop to the point where hopefully Trey can unseat QB1 - if given the opporutnity. Kyle has both Trey and Brock on their rookie contracts for '24 and I think '25. I say keep them for both years and then let Brock/Trey walk when their rookie contracts are up and you keep the better player.

P.S. if Trey can accept maybe 20+ million after his 5th year option as a backup QB to Purdy - while Purdy is on his last year of his rookie contract - I'd take that deal in a heartbeat. The QB depth we'll have for the next 3+ years (if Trey is amendable to it and assuming Brock is QB1) - will be unmatched in the NFL.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,371
Originally posted by tankle104:

Nah, barring a Trey collapse in the Raiders game, my gut says Trey is QB2, and the real battle is between Sam and Allen for QB3.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by tankle104:

Nah, barring a Trey collapse in the Raiders game, my gut says Trey is QB2, and the real battle is between Sam and Allen for QB3.

Let's not sell short, the most talented thrower of the football, since Unitas and/or Tittle.
Originally posted by Giedi:
To be devils advocate and argue the the Pro-Trey's crowd point of view -- they want a Patrick Mahomes. They see Trey as possibly somebody who can turn into Patrick. They want that athleticism, intangibles, and just raw power to oblitierate defenses the way Mahomes can. They see that in Trey, if Kyle will just allow Trey some more reps and a faster development. I see Trey as more of Steve Young than Patrick - but that's just me.

The Pro-Purdy side can see the Joe Montana/Drew Brees aspects of Brock's game. I definitely can see Joe's intangibles a bit in Brock Purdy's game. He's one intenlligent QB that makes things happen with both his arm and his mind.

As for me, I say let the chips fall where they may. As how Kyle is allowing it to happen right now. Have Purdy be QB1 and have Trey continue to develop to the point where hopefully Trey can unseat QB1 - if given the opporutnity. Kyle has both Trey and Brock on their rookie contracts for '24 and I think '25. I say keep them for both years and then let Brock/Trey walk when their rookie contracts are up and you keep the better player.

P.S. if Trey can accept maybe 20+ million after his 5th year option as a backup QB to Purdy - while Purdy is on his last year of his rookie contract - I'd take that deal in a heartbeat. The QB depth we'll have for the next 3+ years (if Trey is amendable to it and assuming Brock is QB1) - will be unmatched in the NFL.

I don't know if serious or not. But if this team spent 20+ million on a back up rather than surrounding a rookie 7th round contract with the most talent to play with that would be embarrassing.
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 25,440
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
The ONLY reason you're diminishing arm talent for a freaking NFL QB is because Brock doesn't check that box.

you were the same poster s**tting on the ability to extend plays, Brock does it and you're tight in the pants over it 😂

yeah in a league where there's a hard cap, you'd think you'd want highest possible talent at the most important position in sports. All these QBs are massively overpaid.

fixed

you WILL have to pay the QB. No one cares if you pay Mahomes or Allen a billion dollars. They're worth it. Paying Daniel Jones or Derick Carr $160,000,000 is not a spot any fan should want to be in. Imo you're in NFL purgatory with that s**t.

We should all want the highest level QB possible. Trying to diminish arm talent for a position that literally is about throwing is silly. The only reason someone would think it doesn't matter is a person that knows our current QB lacks that.

but yes to your point as of today he's dirt cheap and we don't have to pay him for a bit.

Why do you do it to Brock then?

On this subject there are different aspects to arm talent. What Z Wilson has, will get you taken 2 overall, and he flat sucks. BP doesn't just complete passes, the ball is money, almost all the time. So accuracy, is surely a part of arm talent, and BP has that in spades. I would rather decent arm strength, with very high accuracy, than an inaccurate cannon.

Arm talent is also the ability to "massage" throws through the outstretched hands of the DL, change arm angles, throw off balance, throw off the wrong foot, know when to loft or bullet a pass, etc. Steve Young (the real one, not Sam Darnold who is Steve Young 2.0) has talked about this a lot. Purdy ABSOLUTELY has that type of arm talent. He showed more of it in his 8 games last year than we've seen in 20+ years since Garcia/Young days. It's not all about velocity or how far a QB can throw.

That's what I don't understand about NY and a few others' who relentlessly attack this aspect of Purdy's ability. They went on and on about how Jimmy didn't have it and we had to have it. Now we have a QB who does have it, and they're complaining that he can't throw it 70 yards. There is literally ONE quarterback who has everything that they're looking for, and that's Mahomes. And I don't even know if Mahomes would be who he is had Kyle drafted him, because is he "a*****e" enough to battle Kyle for that type of freedom? He doesn't need to do that with Reid, because Reid allows much more freedom with his players.

Why are some wishing for a mythical QB? It's weird.

To be devils advocate and argue the the Pro-Trey's crowd point of view -- they want a Patrick Mahomes. They see Trey as possibly somebody who can turn into Patrick. They want that athleticism, intangibles, and just raw power to oblitierate defenses the way Mahomes can. They see that in Trey, if Kyle will just allow Trey some more reps and a faster development. I see Trey as more of Steve Young than Patrick - but that's just me.

The Pro-Purdy side can see the Joe Montana/Drew Brees aspects of Brock's game. I definitely can see Joe's intangibles a bit in Brock Purdy's game. He's one intenlligent QB that makes things happen with both his arm and his mind.

As for me, I say let the chips fall where they may. As how Kyle is allowing it to happen right now. Have Purdy be QB1 and have Trey continue to develop to the point where hopefully Trey can unseat QB1 - if given the opporutnity. Kyle has both Trey and Brock on their rookie contracts for '24 and I think '25. I say keep them for both years and then let Brock/Trey walk when their rookie contracts are up and you keep the better player.

P.S. if Trey can accept maybe 20+ million after his 5th year option as a backup QB to Purdy - while Purdy is on his last year of his rookie contract - I'd take that deal in a heartbeat. The QB depth we'll have for the next 3+ years (if Trey is amendable to it and assuming Brock is QB1) - will be unmatched in the NFL.

If Trey was going to be "a Patrick Mahomes," I think we'd know by now. Not the stats necessarily, but the ability would flash. I haven't seen it and none of the players nor coaches talk like that about him. I understand the desire, and Mahomes is fun to watch. It's just not a reasonable thing to wish for, all the while taking dumps on a very good and possibly great QB in his own right.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
The ONLY reason you're diminishing arm talent for a freaking NFL QB is because Brock doesn't check that box.

you were the same poster s**tting on the ability to extend plays, Brock does it and you're tight in the pants over it 😂

yeah in a league where there's a hard cap, you'd think you'd want highest possible talent at the most important position in sports. All these QBs are massively overpaid.

fixed

you WILL have to pay the QB. No one cares if you pay Mahomes or Allen a billion dollars. They're worth it. Paying Daniel Jones or Derick Carr $160,000,000 is not a spot any fan should want to be in. Imo you're in NFL purgatory with that s**t.

We should all want the highest level QB possible. Trying to diminish arm talent for a position that literally is about throwing is silly. The only reason someone would think it doesn't matter is a person that knows our current QB lacks that.

but yes to your point as of today he's dirt cheap and we don't have to pay him for a bit.

Why do you do it to Brock then?

On this subject there are different aspects to arm talent. What Z Wilson has, will get you taken 2 overall, and he flat sucks. BP doesn't just complete passes, the ball is money, almost all the time. So accuracy, is surely a part of arm talent, and BP has that in spades. I would rather decent arm strength, with very high accuracy, than an inaccurate cannon.

Arm talent is also the ability to "massage" throws through the outstretched hands of the DL, change arm angles, throw off balance, throw off the wrong foot, know when to loft or bullet a pass, etc. Steve Young (the real one, not Sam Darnold who is Steve Young 2.0) has talked about this a lot. Purdy ABSOLUTELY has that type of arm talent. He showed more of it in his 8 games last year than we've seen in 20+ years since Garcia/Young days. It's not all about velocity or how far a QB can throw.

That's what I don't understand about NY and a few others' who relentlessly attack this aspect of Purdy's ability. They went on and on about how Jimmy didn't have it and we had to have it. Now we have a QB who does have it, and they're complaining that he can't throw it 70 yards. There is literally ONE quarterback who has everything that they're looking for, and that's Mahomes. And I don't even know if Mahomes would be who he is had Kyle drafted him, because is he "a*****e" enough to battle Kyle for that type of freedom? He doesn't need to do that with Reid, because Reid allows much more freedom with his players.

Why are some wishing for a mythical QB? It's weird.

To be devils advocate and argue the the Pro-Trey's crowd point of view -- they want a Patrick Mahomes. They see Trey as possibly somebody who can turn into Patrick. They want that athleticism, intangibles, and just raw power to oblitierate defenses the way Mahomes can. They see that in Trey, if Kyle will just allow Trey some more reps and a faster development. I see Trey as more of Steve Young than Patrick - but that's just me.

The Pro-Purdy side can see the Joe Montana/Drew Brees aspects of Brock's game. I definitely can see Joe's intangibles a bit in Brock Purdy's game. He's one intenlligent QB that makes things happen with both his arm and his mind.

As for me, I say let the chips fall where they may. As how Kyle is allowing it to happen right now. Have Purdy be QB1 and have Trey continue to develop to the point where hopefully Trey can unseat QB1 - if given the opporutnity. Kyle has both Trey and Brock on their rookie contracts for '24 and I think '25. I say keep them for both years and then let Brock/Trey walk when their rookie contracts are up and you keep the better player.

P.S. if Trey can accept maybe 20+ million after his 5th year option as a backup QB to Purdy - while Purdy is on his last year of his rookie contract - I'd take that deal in a heartbeat. The QB depth we'll have for the next 3+ years (if Trey is amendable to it and assuming Brock is QB1) - will be unmatched in the NFL.

Great post and very similar to how I see things also.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
I don't know if serious or not. But if this team spent 20+ million on a back up rather than surrounding a rookie 7th round contract with the most talent to play with that would be embarrassing.

I have seen this suggestion at least a half dozen times now, it assumes the guy is backup QB, and goes on to say we should pay him QB1 dollars, anyway. Blows my mind everytime..
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,371
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Steve Young drove me nuts when he was one-read-and-run Steve. But Walsh kept him to his credit and developed him. Same can be said with Trey. I hope trey kills the Raiders. I disagree with any Trey Lance trades. The guy is so raw, I think its worth it to keep Trey even on his 5th year option just to see what he can develop into (so long as there is some indication of improvement) afterall Brock and Trey combined would only be around 21+ million. That would be a bargain for two elite QBs. 5 games in on Jimmys 49er career, Garoppolo got 20+ million a year by himself. Brock's already put 8 games, all wins like Jimmy.

Well said and I agree completely. There will never be a trade market in which the team gets what they spent on Trey, or what he may actually be worth. Keep him around as long as possible in case there are injuries OR he plays s his way into the starting lineup.

Yeah, for the pro-Brock guys, Trey will never garner 3 number 1 picks, given He's currently QB2. Unless a bottom feeding team with an idiot owner and an idiot HC would do so. (it's happened in the past though) I don't really see that as realistic. Unless Trey becomes QB1 and takes the 49ers to the playoffs then possibly I can see a round 1 pick in the offering.

ShanaLynch don't need multiple number 1 picks anyway, the way they are drafting and developing players in the lower rounds. Mitchell, Jauan, Greenlaw, Mason, and stealing... I mean getting great deals from bottom feeding teams like landing CMC. To me getting CMC for a 2nd, 3rd, and (I think) a 4th is freaking highway robbery.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone