QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Hahaha calling Cosell a clown. Nah he doesn't care about your feelings. He one of the best QB evaluators and has been watching film longer than you've been alive I'll bet. Man you're trying way too hard.

He basically said he can't claim he's the second coming of Montana after 6 games. Rightfully so AND he is correct saying the last couple games he wasn't seeing the field as well as he was earlier. He wasn't throwing with anticipation like earlier. Like I said! Doesn't mean he can't (because he has) or he won't improve. Cosell calling it like he sees it. It's not rose colored fandom glasses.

Love how you left out the rest of the comment with Mullens vs Brock. Love how you left out the part about people telling him he needs to apologize about Brock after the first game. You know people can actually listen to it, right? You leaving out parts to try and make Cosell sound less knowledgeable or try to devalue him is p***y s**t.

As far as what he said about Lance, I agree theres really no conversation to be had. Kid hasn't played football. I agree overall he hasn't seen the field well in his short amount of time playing. Not shocking for a 22 yr old QB stepping into the league a yr removed from playing football with 300 passing attempts to his name.

I don't dispute anything he said about his play. Bringing up Mullens though lol that's a clown move. He's trying too hard to throw shade here.

This is a take you get from a guy that's mad at people questioning his evaluation and wants to be proven right.

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
I don't dispute anything he said about his play. Bringing up Mullens though lol that's a clown move. He's trying too hard to throw shade here.

This is a take you get from a guy that's mad at people questioning his evaluation and wants to be proven right.

you just hate it because you know its a good point and it pisses you off.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Cosell is not admitting he is wrong and trying to say he was right.

Saying Brock is like Millens is ignorance or desperation.

He said he can't make any real evaluation of a QB after 6 games. That's not some shocking thing. Dude knows more about the QB position and football than anyone in here.

you clearly didn't listen to the pod if you think he was straight up comparing him to Mullens. Shocking you got an opinion on something you don't know anything about.

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
I don't dispute anything he said about his play. Bringing up Mullens though lol that's a clown move. He's trying too hard to throw shade here.

This is a take you get from a guy that's mad at people questioning his evaluation and wants to be proven right.

He said Mullens threw for a ton of yards with Kyle. He said kyle gets all his QBs in the best position to have success. He also said Brock wasn't making those same mental errors that Mullens and Jimmy made…you conveniently left that last part out because it doesn't help your b******t clown take on Cosell so you left it out.

you're so f**king bias that you've stooped to calling a very well respected QB evaluator that will forget more about football then you'll ever know.

if Cosell had nothing but amazing things to say about Brock you'd be copy and pasting it all over the place.

We got a bunch of 🤡 in here calling Cosell trash because he's not pushing their narrative lol. If that's not bias then I don't know what is… you've all but shown us your cards by going that route. Not sure how anyone can take what you say seriously after that.

Cosell kept it real, he didn't say Brock stunk either. He played good football. I'll value his opinion about QB play over anyone in here who thinks they're smarter than him because guess what you're not.

This thread is way too intense for the offseason. Damn.

Originally posted by pdc20:

I like Cosell because he´s fair. He has no bias.
He´s right that you have to let Purdy play more games to really know who he is.
That being said I don´t agree with the roll to the left thing.
Purdy rolls to his left most of the time because that´s the only thing he can do when he´s pressured. Obviously if he could go to his right he would. It would be easier for him to throw running on the right side. And I don´t see this roll to the lef thing as a weakness because it´s not like he´s a turnover machine after that. At worse it´s a throw away. There´s no sacks, no interceptions, no fumbles. There was the sack against the Cardinals against Isaiah Simmons but that´s about it. Sometimes when Micah Parsons is running after you, you do what you can.
He has to be better at stepping up in the pocket, that I would agree with Cosell.
At the end of the day he´s just a rookie, so you can´t be too critical on him but at the same time you should wait before calling him the next big thing.

I thought he started going to it a little too much in the 2nd quarter of the Seahawks game, but that's really it. It's not this glaring thing that Cosell makes it out to be.

He sounds sour

"He threw one straight to Diggs idk what he was doing there"

"You know, Brock Purdy got benched twice in college"

"You know, Nick Mullens!!"

Like bro you might've been wrong on draft evaluation. We don't know yet, he's right, but he is a little bitter lol

Originally posted by NYniner85:

We got a bunch of 🤡 in here calling Cosell trash because he's not pushing their narrative lol. If that's not bias then I don't know what is… you've all but shown us your cards by going that route. Not sure how anyone can take what you say seriously after that.

Cosell kept it real, he didn't say Brock stunk either. He played good football. I'll value his opinion about QB play over anyone in here who thinks they're smarter than him because guess what you're not.

I already said I dont disagree too much with his evaluation. He's just focused on the little bad when there's a mountain of good to talk about. Him talking about Mullens (lmao) and bringing up the people questioning him makes it clear why that's his focus

Originally posted by VinculumJuris:
This thread is way too intense for the offseason. Damn.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

He said he can't make any real evaluation of a QB after 6 games. That's not some shocking thing. Dude knows more about the QB position and football than anyone in here.

you clearly didn't listen to the pod if you think he was straight up comparing him to Mullens. Shocking you got an opinion on something you don't know anything about.

The thing is you CAN make an evaluation of 6 games. He just doesn't want to because it makes him look wrong. He's never had a problem talking about a QBs first 6 games when their play matches his evaluation.

Saying we need to wait and see is obvious lol, but the things he focuses on and talks about when evaluating Purdy screams of sour grapes

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
I already said I dont disagree too much with his evaluation. He's just focused on the little bad when there's a mountain of good to talk about. Him talking about Mullens (lmao) and bringing up the people questioning him makes it clear why that's his focus

He brought up Mullens (clearly) to show that Kyle does whatever he can to put his QBs in a position to succeed. His play calling reflects that. He also said Brock doesn't make the same mistakes that Mullens/Jimmy did as far as putting the ball in harms way (he did say Brock got away with some, which in fact he did). He talked about Brock having lighter feet and better movement inside/outside the pocket compared to Jimmy.

you went into the conversation with a preconceive notion you would dislike what he had to say. You then got angry and dwelled on anything negative to the point of calling Cosell's comments a clown take. You grabbed only parts of the conversation acting like that's all that was discussed.

The truth of it all of it, is it's a small sample size to make any real opinion (with conviction) on who Brock will be in the league. Cosell is right. That's not meant to be some shade at Brock. It just means you can't make an evaluation on it. Yes as the games went on things got shakier not better…he's a rookie who didn't have a full offseason as the guy (won't this yr either). IMO that makes sense. For sure there's more good than bad. For sure he can improve. He might be the guy LT….he might not. Who the f**k knows. He's got to get heathy before we can even talk about the rest.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

He said he can't make any real evaluation of a QB after 6 games. That's not some shocking thing. Dude knows more about the QB position and football than anyone in here.

you clearly didn't listen to the pod if you think he was straight up comparing him to Mullens. Shocking you got an opinion on something you don't know anything about.

Is he your dad or something?

No need to get personal.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

He brought up Mullens (clearly) to show that Kyle does whatever he can to put his QBs in a position to succeed. His play calling reflects that. He also said Brock doesn't make the same mistakes that Mullens/Jimmy did as far as putting the ball in harms way (he did say Brock got away with some, which in fact he did). He talked about Brock having lighter feet and better movement inside/outside the pocket compared to Jimmy.

you went into the conversation with a preconceive notion you would dislike what he had to say. You then got angry and dwelled on anything negative to the point of calling Cosell's comments a clown take. You grabbed only parts of the conversation acting like that's all that was discussed.

The truth of it all of it, is it's a small sample size to make any real opinion (with conviction) on who Brock will be in the league. Cosell is right. That's not meant to be some shade at Brock. It just means you can't make an evaluation on it. Yes as the games went on things got shakier not better…he's a rookie who didn't have a full offseason as the guy (won't this yr either). IMO that makes sense. For sure there's more good than bad. For sure he can improve. He might be the guy LT….he might not. Who the f**k knows. He's got to get heathy before we can even talk about the rest.

I don't dislike his evaluation though. I think it's fair, but for that to be his focus is telling. Talking about almost ints and Nick Mullens lol. He obviously didn't appreciate people telling him he needed to apologize to Purdy, there was really no reason to bring that stuff up unless it bothered him

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
The thing is you CAN make an evaluation of 6 games. He just doesn't want to because it makes him look wrong. He's never had a problem talking about a QBs first 6 games when their play matches his evaluation.

Saying we need to wait and see is obvious lol, but the things he focuses on and talks about when evaluating Purdy screams of sour grapes

You think Cosell cares about being wrong over Brock? The whole league would be wrong if he turns into Joe Burrow. It's not like Greg has been on some island screaming with a microphone, Brock sucks.

show me where he had a QB figured out and was able to tell you who he will or won't be after 6 games…show me. I've listen to his pod plenty. I've followed him for years. He's always maintained he's not gonna be able to tell you who so and so will be after a small sample size. Dude is Switzerland when it comes to stuff like that. There is no bias. It's just the film.

You're just butt hurt he isn't on your narrative, so you're gonna try to downplay who he is and what he does. Like I said, that's p***y s**t. He didn't have anything glowing to say about Lance, I'm not trying to discredit him or what he knows because of that. Overall it's the truth for both.

only one who's got sour grapes is you. You've shown your hand on how bias you are with this topic and imo your credibility to talk about it is nonexistent now

Originally posted by NYniner85:

You think Cosell cares about being wrong over Brock? The whole league would be wrong if he turns into Joe Burrow. It's not like Greg has been on some island screaming with a microphone, Brock sucks.

show me where he had a QB figured out and was able to tell you who he will or won't be after 6 games…show me. I've listen to his pod plenty. I've followed him for years. He's always maintained he's not gonna be able to tell you who so and so will be after a small sample size. Dude is Switzerland when it comes to stuff like that. There is no bias. It's just the film.

You're just butt hurt he isn't on your narrative, so you're gonna try to downplay who he is and what he does. Like I said, that's p***y s**t. He didn't have anything glowing to say about Lance, I'm not trying to discredit him or what he knows because of that. Overall it's the truth for both.

only one who's got sour grapes is you. You've shown your hand on how bias you are with this topic and imo your credibility to talk about it is nonexistent now

Nobody said Purdy is a future HOFer man. You constantly use that straw man.

"Expert" has random people telling him he needs to apologize for his evaluation. That obviously bothers him if he is thinking about it enough to mention it in a interview