QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

The math where 2 15 doesn't equal 19.
The reading where responding to someone saying

Lots of football left but if Mac continues to play well and Brock comes back and is meh

With...

I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back

Is a response(thus the quote in the first place) and not me calling Purdy mid.

If you're struggling here it's not a surprise you're not interested in digging deeper into the football discussions.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:
No need for personal insults but I would expect when people are having a conversation that if you're not just here to stir things up and instigate that you should be able to follow a conversation or at least validate the stuff you post.

TD you can bring up that post however times you want it won't change that I was responding to his posts where he couldn't do simple math or read the posts he was trying to play gotcha on.

We can get back to discussing Purdy whenever you guys want now.

No........
Personal attacks are ok?

Whatever you think you're doing here, you're failing.

The discussion was about the posts you here and responses to them.

I like Brock but I'm really glad we have Jones right now. It's quite a luxury to have a back-up who is actually capable of going out and winning games, which hasn't been the case for the last couple of years. Another advantage of having Jones, is that his take what they give you approach could help temper some of Brock's gunslinger tendencies. Not that I want him to lose that mentality for sticking in the dagger when the opportunity is there, but just to be reminded that sometimes a six-yard gain is better than a spectacular incompletion or an interception.

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by Montana:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Willis had a more severe toe issue but that doesn't mean Purdy's can't get worse. If it becomes a chronic thing like Willis where it never eally heals then his career could be cut short.

Exactly. This is common sense. Rest him up as long as he needs, we have a fantastic backup. This is best we could ask for given the situation.

I don't know why ppl seem to disregard this injury like it's nothing to be too concerned about and that it really shouldn't affect his play. It's ridiculous.

Yes it also took out one of the best corners in history with Deion moving to safety and then retirement. Turf Toe should be called toe Galactica. Maybe they will have folks take it more seriously 🤔

We had people in here dismissing Steve Young talking about the issues turf toe on the plant foot causes QBs because he wasn't Purdy's personal doctor.

If people don't want to give Brock the benefit of the doubt that the injury led to his accuracy issues vs the Jags then nothing you add about the severity of the injury will matter.

Originally posted by 49ers81:
I like Brock but I'm really glad we have Jones right now. It's quite a luxury to have a back-up who is actually capable of going out and winning games, which hasn't been the case for the last couple of years. Another advantage of having Jones, is that his take what they give you approach could help temper some of Brock's gunslinger tendencies. Not that I want him to lose that mentality for sticking in the dagger when the opportunity is there, but just to be reminded that sometimes a six-yard gain is better than a spectacular incompletion or an interception.

It's a balancing act. You don't want to play hero ball when you have other downs to work with but you also don't want to play too safe and then find yourself in constant tough 3rd and long situations.

I expect Brock to find that sweet spot. I think a lot of QBs get in that groove in the 4th season.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

The math where 2 15 doesn't equal 19.
The reading where responding to someone saying

Lots of football left but if Mac continues to play well and Brock comes back and is meh

With...

I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back

Is a response(thus the quote in the first place) and not me calling Purdy mid.

If you're struggling here it's not a surprise you're not interested in digging deeper into the football discussions.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:
No need for personal insults but I would expect when people are having a conversation that if you're not just here to stir things up and instigate that you should be able to follow a conversation or at least validate the stuff you post.

TD you can bring up that post however times you want it won't change that I was responding to his posts where he couldn't do simple math or read the posts he was trying to play gotcha on.

We can get back to discussing Purdy whenever you guys want now.

No........
Personal attacks are ok?

Whatever you think you're doing here, you're failing.

The discussion was about the posts you here and responses to them.

Doesnt matter what your logic is .....first rule is be respectful. Pretty sure calling someone basically stupid, i think even multiple times falls under that rule. Apparently calling someone a JG cult member is......not sure how that is disrespectful....some might see it as a compliment. Stupid is straight forward.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:
Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

Hmmmmm.....is this ok?

Yes

Originally posted by RonMexico:
Yes

Is this the new shift?

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by RonMexico:
Yes

Is this the new shift?

There is a contact the mods feature. Stop spamming this thread with your concerns.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by RonMexico:
Yes

Is this the new shift?

There is a contact the mods feature. Stop spamming this thread with your concerns.

I am aware. You decided to provoke this convo on the board.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

The math where 2 15 doesn't equal 19.
The reading where responding to someone saying

Lots of football left but if Mac continues to play well and Brock comes back and is meh

With...

I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back

Is a response(thus the quote in the first place) and not me calling Purdy mid.

If you're struggling here it's not a surprise you're not interested in digging deeper into the football discussions.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:
No need for personal insults but I would expect when people are having a conversation that if you're not just here to stir things up and instigate that you should be able to follow a conversation or at least validate the stuff you post.

TD you can bring up that post however times you want it won't change that I was responding to his posts where he couldn't do simple math or read the posts he was trying to play gotcha on.

We can get back to discussing Purdy whenever you guys want now.

No........
Personal attacks are ok?

Whatever you think you're doing here, you're failing.

The discussion was about the posts you here and responses to them.

Doesnt matter what your logic is .....first rule is be respectful. Pretty sure calling someone basically stupid, i think even multiple times falls under that rule. Apparently calling someone a JG cult member is......not sure how that is disrespectful....some might see it as a compliment. Stupid is straight forward.

Calling someone "basically stupid" is an interpretation you made, not the words actually said. Maybe take a break from policing things that don't need it.

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

TIL Brett Favre and his 1.51 career td/int ratio didn't play the position at a high level.

Wow. This is a really stupid post. It is as if you have zero concept of football and its history.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

TIL Brett Favre and his 1.51 career td/int ratio didn't play the position at a high level.

Wow. This is a really stupid post. It is as if you have zero concept of football and its history.

Please explain what you think is stupid. I'm having a hard time knowing how to address your criticism when you won't make clear what you think is stupid.

i know you think you're doing a little clever, "gotcha," but all I see is a guy who's complaining about something he has no issue taking part of, which kind of undermines your whining about genus.

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

TIL Brett Favre and his 1.51 career td/int ratio didn't play the position at a high level.

Wow. This is a really stupid post. It is as if you have zero concept of football and its history.

Please explain what you think is stupid. I'm having a hard time knowing how to address your criticism when you won't make clear what you think is stupid.

i know you think you're doing a little clever, "gotcha," but all I see is a guy who's complaining about something he has no issue taking part of, which kind of undermines your whining about genus.

Nope. Its what i wanted to say earlier but didnt.

Explain? Wow! I got nothing for you.

Originally posted by TD49ers:
Nope. Its what i wanted to say earlier but didnt.

Explain? Wow! I got nothing for you.

So you're incapable of clarifying your opinion? I'm happy to defend the TD to Int ratio statement, but I need to know what your critique of it is.