Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
one of the most confusing posts of all time right here. dilfer didn't play 'well enough' to get the job done. that's like saying scott burrell played well enough for chicago bulls to win rings. no, jordan played well enough. burrell happened to be on the team with jordan. that's what happened. dilfer happened to be on a team with ray lewis and that defense. he didn't do anything man.
What's confusing about it? Trent Dilfer was the QB of a team that won to the Super Bowl by a score of 34-7, he only completed about 50% of his passes but they won the game going away because of the team's other strengths. Ergo, for one season, Trent Dilfer played well enough for the team to win the game's biggest prize. Doesn't mean he played great and doesn't mean someone else couldn't have done better, it just means his play that year didn't cost them the prize they were after. It's just a simple statement of fact.
On the other hand, while I'm no expert on the history of Lamar Jackson's playoff runs, it seems to me the reason they lost a lot of those games was because he didn't play well. A quick Google search shows that in 2019, when he won his first MVP award, they lost in the Divisional round 28-12 in a game where Jackson threw 2 picks and lost a fumble. So the guy who was deemed the league's most valuable player couldn't help them get it done when it counted. It seems to me that, based on the criteria that a lot of people in here like to apply to the term elite, e.g. a player who can carry his team to wins, that wasn't a very elite like performance, and in the end, he couldn't deliver the Raven's the same result as their journeyman QB did several years before. Again, it's a simple statement of fact.