QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by boast:
Purdy left the field with the lead in the 2023 Super Bowl. im not sure why youre whining.

This.

Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
I'm just glad the deal was signed early and with zero drama.

Same, very nice, Purdy seems to be a guy of his word. No drama and done, back to buisness.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
You contradicted yourself in the first paragraph talking about track record and other coaches being bad there as well.

if you went back to the OP the guy basically said he blames Kyle for the poor outcomes at the end of games and not the QB…I said that's nonsense. I don't care if you have Walsh calling plays….they're never ever gonna be 100% open/easy completions. I would say Kyle's probably one of the best in the league in trying to make that a thing for his QB.

At some point in a game (especially late in games) you need a player to just make a damn play. That's why they're making massive amounts of money. The good QBs do that. Go look at some of the best moments in NFL history when something was needed. Mahomes did it to us twice. Big Ben game winning SB throw scrambling around. Tom Brady numerous times. Eli manning twice, Stafford no look pass etc etc.

Brock showed he's capable of it vs DET/GB. We need that to get more consistent, if we're gonna win it all with him.

Sure but using last year as a big point of emphasis isn't it.

When the roster is a shell of itself then you're asking a guy to work miracles in a way. It's not a realistic ask. We've seen him do it when he has guys who can help him make plays but when you're missing key pieces and guys who are out there don't have the same timing down it will impact the ability of the QB to make plays.

Also I didn't contradict anything. Saying in general those situations don't lead to success in general doesn't eliminate the fact that Kyle runs his offense and brings in talent on the OL to have success outside of those conditions. When we get into those scenarios whether with Brock or not the results aren't great.

It's not very complex. If we're going to not OL a heavy priority and roll out the Jake Brendel's
of the world at arguably one of the most important positions on the OL in this offense then we better stay out of must pass situations.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
So now that Purdy has his big contract can we expect a SB win? If we don't I'm sure fans will blame it on a weak O line, bad receivers or Kyle's play calling.

Dude what are you going on about?

Like for real what were you trying to accomplish with this post?

I think what he's saying is, now we have a f**k ton of cash allocated towards a QB it might be harder to win it all vs having him running around making $900k a yr.

Brock is gonna have to do more with less going forward. Just how it works. We still got the horses to do it now. We will see a couple yrs from now though.

Doesn't read like that at all. Reads like now that he's paid big money he should win the SB and if he doesn't then he expects people to just blame everyone else.

Because we know how all the other QBs who got paid big money ended up winning the SB.

Originally posted by Jcool:

A significant detail on the contract of Brock Purdy… https://t.co/ZTcJaHgIx3

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) May 19, 2025

Damn did they really need to add that too.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Damn did they really need to add that too.

All part of the negotiations. Probably helped them give him less money and it's another layer of faith from the team as well.

Don't think it's particularly a huge thing either. Hopefully we never have to worry about it and Brock makes that contract seem like a bargain quickly but if it comes down to it these get lifted by players all the time.

A no trade clause for a franchise QB just doesn't matter. All that matters is the gtd money.

If he's good then they won't want to trade him. If he's not living up to the deal no team would give up anything for this contract. He can still be cut.

Also, nobody trades for QBs that don't want to be there. He would just waive this for a team he likes if it meant staying on this deal.

This just doesn't matter. This isn't the NBA.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Damn did they really need to add that too.

All part of the negotiations. Probably helped them give him less money and it's another layer of faith from the team as well.

Don't think it's particularly a huge thing either. Hopefully we never have to worry about it and Brock makes that contract seem like a bargain quickly but if it comes down to it these get lifted by players all the time.

Yeah, the deal is good enough on the team's end that there's going to be concessions. Brock got lower per year salary than he probably could have asked for but more guaranteed money. The team has an out in three years, but Brock controls where he can go if the team seeks a trade. Seems like a fair deal all around.

And honestly, when you pay a guy 53 million a year, he's only tradable as long as he remains good and healthy, in which case, why would you trade him?

It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

If he's bad enough that they want out of the deal they'd just cut him.

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

If he's bad enough that they want out of the deal they'd just cut him.

Right, and if he's bad enough that they want to get rid of him, what team is trying to trade for him on this contract?

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

If he's bad enough that they want out of the deal they'd just cut him.

Right, and if he's bad enough that they want to get rid of him, what team is trying to trade for him on this contract?

Exactly. This is a nothing burger

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

This.

Media is going to explode and make a massive deal about this, but honestly? I can't think of a situation where it makes sense for us to trade him, other than him sitting out and demanding one.

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

This.

Media is going to explode and make a massive deal about this, but honestly? I can't think of a situation where it makes sense for us to trade him, other than him sitting out and demanding one.

He'd waive it in that case

Originally posted by okdkid:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
It's difficult to imagine the scenario where that no-trade clause ever becomes an issue.

This.

Media is going to explode and make a massive deal about this, but honestly? I can't think of a situation where it makes sense for us to trade him, other than him sitting out and demanding one.

He'd waive it in that case

Precisely