QB Brock Purdy Thread

Regarding the SB, Purdy did leave 2 TDs on the field to a wide open WR. Maybe we win of we didn't have to settle for the FG.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I actually agree that the Darnold contract is good news for us—BUT Purdy is still getting at least $50M a year.

We'll see if this gets a couple of our adamant Super-fans here to chill a little...

Darnold had a fantastic season until the two most important games of the season and s**t his pants.

True, but you are acting like Brock is a super bowl winning QB.

Darnold was better last season, by a good amount.

I am acting like Brock has played 1.5 seasons of fantastic football, 1 season of slightly above average football (all things considered), led us to two NFCCGs in 3 years, and left the field in the Superbowl with a lead three times in the 4th quarter/overtime.

And I am acting like Sam Darnold has had 4+ years of inept quarterbacking, and one fantastic season that ended with him looking like he did in the aforementioned years of inept QBing.

Hope that clears it up for you.

Brock is also a QB that's failed to complete 2 of the 3 seasons he's been here due to injury. He's also shown success on teams loaded with probowl talent but once injuries hit the team he became pretty average and that wasn't with a completely depleted roster just one missing some of the pieces. He's no guarantee in the way the top 5 guys in this league bring season after season.

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I actually agree that the Darnold contract is good news for us—BUT Purdy is still getting at least $50M a year.

We'll see if this gets a couple of our adamant Super-fans here to chill a little...

Darnold had a fantastic season until the two most important games of the season and s**t his pants.

True, but you are acting like Brock is a super bowl winning QB.

Darnold was better last season, by a good amount.

I am acting like Brock has played 1.5 seasons of fantastic football, 1 season of slightly above average football (all things considered), led us to two NFCCGs in 3 years, and left the field in the Superbowl with a lead three times in the 4th quarter/overtime.

And I am acting like Sam Darnold has had 4+ years of inept quarterbacking, and one fantastic season that ended with him looking like he did in the aforementioned years of inept QBing.

Hope that clears it up for you.

If the roles were reversed, and Purdy was drafted to the Jets team, I don't think he does much better.

Darnold went to a good coaching situation and got better. Something Purdy started with since day 1.

Take off your Homer glasses sometimes. It is easy to see if you want to.

I am very aware the situations were different. But as soon as the stage got bright last season, Darnold reverted back to that same terrible QB he was in New York. He had a very good season last year. And then it was ruined by how he played in the last regular season game and playoffs. If he balled out and the Vikings made a deep run, he would still be on the Vikings today.

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I actually agree that the Darnold contract is good news for us—BUT Purdy is still getting at least $50M a year.

We'll see if this gets a couple of our adamant Super-fans here to chill a little...

Darnold had a fantastic season until the two most important games of the season and s**t his pants.

True, but you are acting like Brock is a super bowl winning QB.

Darnold was better last season, by a good amount.

and Purdy was better the two seasons prior and won big games

Listening to the Vikings play by play guy today on KNBR, He was pretty much celebrating that Darnold is gone

Kirk Cousins nearly did the same thing in Minn

Darnold last season was comparable to the season Purdy had the season before last. They are pretty comparable. If we are going off last season, Purdy should probably be paid like Darnold. If we are going off his 1st season and a half, then he was a top 5ish guy.

I know we have to pay him, I'm not sure he is ever going to have a season like he did in his 2nd year again. The offense losing key players and aging won't help either.

And you completely ignore playoff performance lmao.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I actually agree that the Darnold contract is good news for us—BUT Purdy is still getting at least $50M a year.

We'll see if this gets a couple of our adamant Super-fans here to chill a little...

Darnold had a fantastic season until the two most important games of the season and s**t his pants.

True, but you are acting like Brock is a super bowl winning QB.

Darnold was better last season, by a good amount.

I am acting like Brock has played 1.5 seasons of fantastic football, 1 season of slightly above average football (all things considered), led us to two NFCCGs in 3 years, and left the field in the Superbowl with a lead three times in the 4th quarter/overtime.

And I am acting like Sam Darnold has had 4+ years of inept quarterbacking, and one fantastic season that ended with him looking like he did in the aforementioned years of inept QBing.

Hope that clears it up for you.

If the roles were reversed, and Purdy was drafted to the Jets team, I don't think he does much better.

Darnold went to a good coaching situation and got better. Something Purdy started with since day 1.

Take off your Homer glasses sometimes. It is easy to see if you want to.

I am very aware the situations were different. But as soon as the stage got bright last season, Darnold reverted back to that same terrible QB he was in New York. He had a very good season last year. And then it was ruined by how he played in the last regular season game and playoffs. If he balled out and the Vikings made a deep run, he would still be on the Vikings today.

Or maybe they are smart not to over pay because he isn't a game changing QB. You can find other guys and coach them up to be as productive as Purdy and Darnold in a system like we run or Vikings run.

They have a year 2 QB and money to invest around him now.

49ers will be trying to fit salaries around what Purdy will make and it means the roster will probably never be as good as it was 2 years ago, just because of the QB salary.

It happens to most teams that pay pretty good QBs though, it usually never pays off though. You either win with an elite QB or an elite roster built around a QB not making much money.

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I actually agree that the Darnold contract is good news for us—BUT Purdy is still getting at least $50M a year.

We'll see if this gets a couple of our adamant Super-fans here to chill a little...

Darnold had a fantastic season until the two most important games of the season and s**t his pants.

True, but you are acting like Brock is a super bowl winning QB.

Darnold was better last season, by a good amount.

and Purdy was better the two seasons prior and won big games

Listening to the Vikings play by play guy today on KNBR, He was pretty much celebrating that Darnold is gone

Kirk Cousins nearly did the same thing in Minn

Darnold last season was comparable to the season Purdy had the season before last. They are pretty comparable. If we are going off last season, Purdy should probably be paid like Darnold. If we are going off his 1st season and a half, then he was a top 5ish guy.

I know we have to pay him, I'm not sure he is ever going to have a season like he did in his 2nd year again. The offense losing key players and aging won't help either.

And you completely ignore playoff performance lmao.

I wouldn't pay for a playoff performance with an elite team. Purdy averaged 1 td per postseason game. He missed like 2 TDs in the Superbowl. He isn't some great QB like a lot of you are trying to make him out to be from the season before last.

It will be fun to see the excuses for his play because it will probably be closer to last season than his great season.

I wonder how we will sign Purdy with the new constraints?

Franchise tag?

Originally posted by pd24:

Or maybe they are smart not to over pay because he isn't a game changing QB. You can find other guys and coach them up to be as productive as Purdy and Darnold in a system like we run or Vikings run.

They have a year 2 QB and money to invest around him now.

49ers will be trying to fit salaries around what Purdy will make and it means the roster will probably never be as good as it was 2 years ago, just because of the QB salary.

It happens to most teams that pay pretty good QBs though, it usually never pays off though. You either win with an elite QB or an elite roster built around a QB not making much money.

So why is it that Kyle has not had a single QB since he has been our coach play at the level Purdy has?

Seems to be a common belief with the anti Purdy crowd, yet no one can cite an example of how other guys can be as productive as Purdy.

Originally posted by glorydayz:
I wonder how we will sign Purdy with the new constraints?

Franchise tag?

U can't franchise tag a player under contract...

Originally posted by pd24:
I wouldn't pay for a playoff performance with an elite team. Purdy averaged 1 td per postseason game. He missed like 2 TDs in the Superbowl. He isn't some great QB like a lot of you are trying to make him out to be from the season before last.

It will be fun to see the excuses for his play because it will probably be closer to last season than his great season.

Just wait and see what kind of outs are in the contract if/when it's completed. We likely have a season or two where any extension would be low risk. At worst, you burn a couple seasons at the position continuing to evaluate Purdy instead of moving to develop another QB. It's hard to justify a move like that now given Purdy's success.

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I actually agree that the Darnold contract is good news for us—BUT Purdy is still getting at least $50M a year.

We'll see if this gets a couple of our adamant Super-fans here to chill a little...

Darnold had a fantastic season until the two most important games of the season and s**t his pants.

True, but you are acting like Brock is a super bowl winning QB.

Darnold was better last season, by a good amount.

and Purdy was better the two seasons prior and won big games

Listening to the Vikings play by play guy today on KNBR, He was pretty much celebrating that Darnold is gone

Kirk Cousins nearly did the same thing in Minn

Darnold last season was comparable to the season Purdy had the season before last. They are pretty comparable. If we are going off last season, Purdy should probably be paid like Darnold. If we are going off his 1st season and a half, then he was a top 5ish guy.

I know we have to pay him, I'm not sure he is ever going to have a season like he did in his 2nd year again. The offense losing key players and aging won't help either.

And you completely ignore playoff performance lmao.

I wouldn't pay for a playoff performance with an elite team. Purdy averaged 1 td per postseason game. He missed like 2 TDs in the Superbowl. He isn't some great QB like a lot of you are trying to make him out to be from the season before last.

It will be fun to see the excuses for his play because it will probably be closer to last season than his great season.

Lol k

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by glorydayz:
I wonder how we will sign Purdy with the new constraints?

Franchise tag?

U can't franchise tag a player under contract...

Can tag him next year instead of a major contract this year.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by pd24:

Or maybe they are smart not to over pay because he isn't a game changing QB. You can find other guys and coach them up to be as productive as Purdy and Darnold in a system like we run or Vikings run.

They have a year 2 QB and money to invest around him now.

49ers will be trying to fit salaries around what Purdy will make and it means the roster will probably never be as good as it was 2 years ago, just because of the QB salary.

It happens to most teams that pay pretty good QBs though, it usually never pays off though. You either win with an elite QB or an elite roster built around a QB not making much money.

So why is it that Kyle has not had a single QB since he has been our coach play at the level Purdy has?

Seems to be a common belief with the anti Purdy crowd, yet no one can cite an example of how other guys can be as productive as Purdy.

Well, Purdy is probably closer to the guy last season than he was his 1st year and a half. The league has film on him now. We will see if he adjusts. The Ravens game the season before last exposed some things the season before last. It carried into the playoffs and Superbowl and it carried into a lot of last season. They exposed something

Originally posted by eric_anthony:

Originally posted by 49erfaninAZ:
Gives him a chance to prove his worth I guess. Hopefully there is an out if he struggles without a stacked roster

He shouldn't struggle cause he's the real deal right?

I hope so but he sure didn't look like it last year. To many errors/turn overs

Originally posted by pd24:
I wouldn't pay for a playoff performance with an elite team. Purdy averaged 1 td per postseason game. He missed like 2 TDs in the Superbowl. He isn't some great QB like a lot of you are trying to make him out to be from the season before last.

It will be fun to see the excuses for his play because it will probably be closer to last season than his great season.

Can you remind me of the 2 TD he missed in the SB?

I can't bring myself to watch the game again