Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by ritz126:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
This one I thought George should've had. Purdy threaded and it was there for George, hit him in the chest.
Yeah, but Purdy needed to throw that just a split second faster.
when people ask "how much more room for improvement does he have?" - those kind of plays come to mind for me because he'll get better with reps. The anticipation, accuracy, etc. he already does a fine job with those but he has so much more room for improvement when it comes to just operating this offense - think 2016 falcons.
after the first two TDs he started holding the ball a little longer, not running the bootleg fast enough.. i hope it's not getting to his head
You have to remember that there is more than enough film on him for defenses to game plan and try to make him uncomfortable - also, he is most likely seeing new coverages and his "go-to" plays are probably getting unique formations. I think it's just part of him being a rookie.
typically around games 6-12 or so are when rookie qb start to hit a little bump, I'm confident he will work through it. He obviously knows what he is doing - it's all about in-game adjustments.
that doesn't excuse his jogging bootlegs. especially the one that could've separated his shoulder and needed Aiyuk take away an INT. There were other times he locked on to players and ignoring the other routes. He just needs to take what the defense gives us
🤡
tbf i was worried he hit that rookie wall in the first half. that wasnt a great first half (even witht he two TD) he was averaging 3 yards per attemmpt and had like 30 yards. My concerns were alleviated in the 2nd half
The only thing i m worried about is some throws we are getting a bit lucky some of those throws could easily be picks (last few games there has been more than a few batted balls that go straight threw the air)
He has had 6 turnover worthy plays in his last 141 attempts. That his a pretty high rate.
Is this an official stat somewhere or just your opinion/observation?
Pretty sure PFF tracks that.
Yes. PFF tracks them. Fans are free to take them with a grain of salt. But someone brought the subject up and I brought up objective data that correlates with their statement.
Gotcha. How does Purdy fair compared to other QB's during that stretch or for the season? I don't have PFF access otherwise I'd go look myself.
Jimmy was at a rate of 2.9%. Josh Allen is at 5.4%. Patrick Mahomes is at 2.7%. Tom Brady is at 2.8%. Jalen Hurts is at 2.1%. Tua is at 4.8%. Purdy is at 4.3%.
Nice thank you. That is actually REALLY encouraging. Take away just one of those plays and the percentage drops to 3.5%. Take away two and it drops to 2.8%. For a rookie who's playing pretty aggressively, 4.3% is not too bad.
how does that stat work...possible int? Possible int plus actual int?
4.3 and 2.7 does not appear to account that Brock has 3 actual turnovers Mahomes has 5 actual turnovers since the Miami game.
But a turnover doesn't necessarily mean a turnover worthy play. Remember the INT that bounced off Jennings' hands as he tipped it up into the air? That's a turnover, but it's not a turnover worthy play. (I think)
So a non-turnover worthy play can result in a turnover?
So anything can happen in a turnover worthy play like a non-turnover and a non-turnover worthy play can result in a turnover.....
Why should we care about this invented stat?
Do they at least list the actual plays they are tallying to put eyeballs on it?
It's a stat that attempts to remove good luck and bad luck from the raw stat. The raw stat is Brock threw an INT. But it was dumb luck because Jennings tipped it up into the air after the pass hit Jennings in the hands. Brock did not get a TWP on this play.
Remember the pass that the SEA safety dropped after it hit him in the hands? That was a bad pass that did not result in an INT. But the point is that it was a bad throw and the QB deserves to be knocked for it, but the raw INT stat won't show it. There is subjectivity to TWP because some plays are on the edge and it's up to the statistician to make the call.
The ball to Jennings was behind him, it was not a good throw......
We don't know if someone was suppose to be here or there on a throw...knocking the QB that puts a ball exactly where it is suppose to be but a WR gets the rout wrong does not remove luck from the equation.
We don't know what plays the QB is suppose to be knocked for.
Yeah it's a subjective stat. I already mentioned above why it's there. Extreme case, if a QB finishes the season with 5 INTs (low), but his TWP% is highest in the league, it tells us that the QB is fortunate defenders are dropping INTs, and that he needs to take better care of the ball because sooner or later his luck will run out.
All stats are subjective. INT's are dropped, TD catches are dropped, TD catches called back on penalties, perfect passes are dropped by receivers, horrible passes are caught by receivers, etc. Hell, even wins and losses can come down to poor officiating.
[ Edited by YACBros85 on Jan 3, 2023 at 11:53 AM ]