Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by random49er:
haha @ us being so so thankful for all things Brock related. Excited to see what he becomes, but....

We're "loyal" alright. Just not in the order in which people think we are.
Before you start dunking on people maybe you should wait for details on what happened.
Next time maybe don't be so eager to collect the "told ya so"
Naah,...gonna keep the same energy,...especially with how sensitive you get with jokes.
Haven't seen this kinda energy from u since all the "Jimmy's the guy" stuff. Let's keep it going.
Steve had a "told ya so" for Stafford requesting $50M so
"Brock should ask for more" before signing with ANYONE and you called it a "great point."
As of now,..Stafford hasn't "GOTTEN" that, so how is it GREAT,...just going by your forced definitions? Are you FOR these forecasts that havent came true or been proven,... or against them? Dont try to play both sides out of convenience.
I dont see $55M/Yr GTD,...nowhere near it. And this "backpayment loyalty" for a guy you gambled on and won is a figment of your imagination. They pat themselves on the back and continue moving forward.
He didn't walk into the offices one day and say "
hey guys....I'm Brock Purdy, and I'm here to help you keep your jobs! Thank me later."
They DRAFTED him! You generally only get 7 a year. They gambled and the gamble paid off.
The loyalty regarding how much cap space we give him's going to come with "I Believe Heavily In You For The Future." Nothing about this silly "I owe you for the past" stuff. Lynch is sitting around Santa Clara getting family members jobs on the staff,....I dont think these guys were ever anywhere near desperation,...even after this past yr.
p.s.,.... Did you realize that the "we would've stunk in 2023 without Brock being drafted and signing" thing is yet another hypothetical that can never be proven? You're all for using that conjecture as a crutch for your points, though, so I'm just confused?
If you're going to get upset at jokes because people discuss things that have not yet been proven,...at least bring some consistency with the attitude please?
[ Edited by random49er on Feb 26, 2025 at 5:10 PM ]