QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by Bigfishrider:

Originally posted by Crown:
Any updates on injury?

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/12/16/kyle-shanahan-brock-purdy-feels-better-than-earlier-in-the-week/

"He came out well," Shanahan said, via Cam Inman of the San Jose Mercury News. "Haven't seen today. Just talked to trainer. Came in feeling good and better than earlier in week. Got out healthy and should be a lot better going into the next game."

TY

I don't know the timetable on recovery.

would hate to enter playoffs with a hobbled QB like JG last year.

If the oblique is just a strain it will be better in a week or two, provided he doesn't strain it further. The rib is a different story. Cracked, couple weeks, broken, up to 6. But they have gear he could wear to protect it. Pain would be the only thing affecting his game, but they have shots and drugs for that.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
IF Brock leads us far enough to get the starting nod, or IF Brock wins the starting job next year, we absolutely keep Trey around and POSSIBLY use him like Taysom Hill. Otherwise he'll just be a backup.

Or just keep developing him. We all know SF goes though QBs like water

This. You never know when it'll be your time. Be ready.

I mean it should have been implied that while Trey is on the team you keep developing him. Same with Brock.

Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Crown:
TY

I don't know the timetable on recovery.

would hate to enter playoffs with a hobbled QB like JG last year.

If you don't like that, you don't like 49ers football.

Hahaha

this is the way

I think we'll have the whole gang the rest of the way and through the playoffs.

Not if the #2 seed is still there for the taking.

What do you mean?

Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
If the oblique is just a strain it will be better in a week or two, provided he doesn't strain it further. The rib is a different story. Cracked, couple weeks, broken, up to 6. But they have gear he could wear to protect it. Pain would be the only thing affecting his game, but they have shots and drugs for that.

Originally posted by tankle104:
If Brock Purdy ends up being our guy, it would be the best thing salary cap wise. He's making approx $700k this year and in 2025 will make $1.1M.

that would make our super bowl MASSIVE

f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

We'd have some leverage because no one knows if he's a one hit wonder, and the NFL is Not For Long. It would be potentially more money than he'll ever see, and it will still be cheap. And if Trey takes the job, we have a reasonably compensated backup. And if Brock keeps it, we have an under-compensated starter for a few years.

Of course, if he really is that good I doubt an agent would agree to it. But then again, an injury could ruin his career at any moment.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

lol. ridiculous on many levels.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
This is a play where I junk Jimmy checks it down to CMC vs wait for Kittle to break free

.@49ers @brockpurdy13 to @gkittle46 for a TD. The "safe throw" is sometimes the best option…but for Purdy why play safe if you can rip the jugular vein wide open and make the opponent bleeeeed. #BaldysBreakdowns pic.twitter.com/YKozR6mPYj

— Brian Baldinger (@BaldyNFL) December 16, 2022

????????? you better your bottom dollar he does!

And then we get mocked for saying an elite QB steps out of the progression and throws to the open guy for a big play, while terms like "red lighted" are used in condescending posts about how the lack of attacking spirit on the offense is on Shanahan.

It's early, but I really hope Purdy is the real deal. Because it seems he has ice in his veins.

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

lol. ridiculous on many levels.

Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

Money in your hand has more value than money you may get in the future. Should Purdy lead the team to a ring, BOTH sides have incentive to renegotiate.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

lol. ridiculous on many levels.

Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

lol at the NO U. you make many ridiculous posts. so it's not shocking.

your dreaming if you believe any Super Bowl winning QB would immediately accept getting locked into a back up money deal. from the agent to player, you'd get laughed at. lol.

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

lol. ridiculous on many levels.

Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

lol at the NO U. you make many ridiculous posts. so it's not shocking.

your dreaming if you believe any Super Bowl winning QB would immediately accept getting locked into a back up money deal. from the agent to player, you'd get laughed at. lol.

This isn't Madden. These are real people, not video game characters.

.

But as I also pointed out (which you cherry picked out, which tends to be your M.O.), the 49ers will still have some leverage given his small sample size. It is entirely reasonable to accept a tripling of pay in exchange for an additional year or two under contract.

Money in your hand has more value than money you may get in the future. Should Purdy lead the team to a ring, BOTH sides have incentive to renegotiate.

Lol you think a guy making less than one million a year wouldn't accept a 10 million dollar contract.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
If the oblique is just a strain it will be better in a week or two, provided he doesn't strain it further. The rib is a different story. Cracked, couple weeks, broken, up to 6. But they have gear he could wear to protect it. Pain would be the only thing affecting his game, but they have shots and drugs for that.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

lol. ridiculous on many levels.

Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

lol at the NO U. you make many ridiculous posts. so it's not shocking.

your dreaming if you believe any Super Bowl winning QB would immediately accept getting locked into a back up money deal. from the agent to player, you'd get laughed at. lol.

This isn't Madden. These are real people, not video game characters.

your entire idea is not based in kind of reality. jesus f**king christ. you always try to accuse people of the things you do in posts. like you accused me of a straw man argument in this thread earlier this week while using an actual straw man argument about some random 3 INTs. lol youre a terrible poster.

But as I also pointed out (which you cherry picked out, which tends to be your M.O.), the 49ers will still have some leverage given his small sample size. It is entirely reasonable to accept a tripling of pay in exchange for an additional year or two under contract.

no cherry picking is needed when youre entire idea is ridiculous and never going to happen.

Money in your hand has more value than money you may get in the future. Should Purdy lead the team to a ring, BOTH sides have incentive to renegotiate.

should Purdy lead the team to a ship and happen to begin negotiating, it's not going to be for back up money. lolololol at trying rip off the dude.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

Money in your hand has more value than money you may get in the future. Should Purdy lead the team to a ring, BOTH sides have incentive to renegotiate.

You can't extend someone on a rookie contract until their third year anyways so its not happening.

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
f Brock leads us to a Super Bowl win we need to IMMEDIATELY try to extend him to legit backup money if possible. Maybe even high end. With a several years long contract.

lol. ridiculous on many levels.

Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

lol at the NO U. you make many ridiculous posts. so it's not shocking.

your dreaming if you believe any Super Bowl winning QB would immediately accept getting locked into a back up money deal. from the agent to player, you'd get laughed at. lol.

This isn't Madden. These are real people, not video game characters.

your entire idea is not based in kind of reality. jesus f**king christ. you always try to accuse people of the things you do in posts. like you accused me of a straw man argument in this thread earlier this week while using an actual straw man argument about some random 3 INTs. lol youre a terrible poster.

What in the world are you talking about?

But as I also pointed out (which you cherry picked out, which tends to be your M.O.), the 49ers will still have some leverage given his small sample size. It is entirely reasonable to accept a tripling of pay in exchange for an additional year or two under contract.

no cherry picking is needed when youre entire idea is ridiculous and never going to happen.

That is literally not cherry picking.

Money in your hand has more value than money you may get in the future. Should Purdy lead the team to a ring, BOTH sides have incentive to renegotiate.

should Purdy lead the team to a ship and happen to begin negotiating, it's not going to be for back up money. lolololol at trying rip off the dude.

Should he lead them to a ring, he has to face the reality that (a) he's on a four year contract making leas than a million per year, with a GRAND TOTAL of $154,000 guaranteed, (b) his career can end at any moment, and his TINY SAMPLE SIZE is not enough to convince any other team to sign him to starter money at this point, (c) the 49ers invested three first round picks and a third on ANOTHER QB, who happens to be far more physically gifted.

His options are to gamble that his mid-pair is going to win the pot, or get financial security for a few years and simply punt on his "real" contract about when a first round pick would negotiate.

Note that the same thing applies for his final year. He could get a two year extension for 10 million or so if he's simply managing the team to wins. 20 million >> 1 million.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Your comment is ridiculous. The team would be out of their minds not to TRY to extend Purdy for as cheaply as possible if he leads the team to a Super Bowl win. There are SEVERAL reasons.

You think a Super Bowl winning QB, who at this point, looks like an upgrade over two QBs making WAY more money than him isn't going to want to renegotiate?

Money in your hand has more value than money you may get in the future. Should Purdy lead the team to a ring, BOTH sides have incentive to renegotiate.

You can't extend someone on a rookie contract until their third year anyways so its not happening.

Yes, but I was wondering if it were possible to do a wink and nod move where they officially cut him and then sign him as a free agent. I imagine some sort of penalty could be possible.

EDIT—also note the first post I made in this discussion said "IF POSSIBLE," so this is purely academic.