Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 344 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Back handed praise if you ask me.

I refuse to give that troll a click.

Same

Also same. I refused to stop reading and/or share his stuff since the off season. Even when he's had a decent tweet - I just don't share it. Jerk off doesn't deserve his stuff to be shared. I hope his following shrinks and he realizes that being a 12 year old whiner isn't the way to keep a majority of adults entertained.
Originally posted by Chance:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Back handed praise if you ask me.

I refuse to give that troll a click.

Same

I did click his grades article last night out of curiosity and saw he gave Purdy an "A" with some backhanded compliments. I guess that one incompletion withheld the + in his mind. He just can't quite give full credit, but crapping on Purdy any further makes him look delusional. Didn't his dad used to harp on Joe early in his career? The s**t doesn't fall far from the a*****e.

Like his main observation is that he improved " the worst part of his game" the deep ball. Imagine saying that about a player who played in a tight game completing 19 of 20, 0 pics, 0 fumbles, scoring over 30 points how many games? Unreal.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
We better be #1 in power rankings tomorrow

I'm not one that really cares about early season power rankings but I could see the bills being 1. They played really well last week and Allen looked really good. It's all irrelevant at this stage - I just want us to keep winning to keep the 1 seed in our controlled destiny
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,299
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49erKing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by tankle104:

Arm is definitely stronger than Montana's.

No not really. They both throw extremely catchable balls on all their different types of throws though. Both elite there.

Disagree, I remember Montana's long balls had more arch to them. Early in Montana's career (Before Rice) he had long ball issues. Which are not a big deal during the early years as he had Wendell Tyler. That Aiyuk 40+ yard throw was a flatter trajectory than Montana's usual deep throws, as I recall it.
Having a lower trajectory on deep balls all the time means your arm isn't as strong, because you have to cut out the wasted motion. You think Russell Wilson has a weak arm? His deep balls are more tear drop than anyone's I've ever seen.

The second the ball leaves your hand, the only forces working on it are gravity and friction. A high arching ball travels a further net distance than a flattened one. It takes more arm to throw more distance. QBs who depend on a flat arc for deep balls probably do not have as strong an arm as those who don't.

HOWEVER, it could also merely be a preference. The QB maybe doesn't anticipate as much as the tear drop guy and has to sling it to get it there in time, or perhaps they're paranoid about the ball taking a long time to get there.

.
.
.
EDIT: before I get tarred and feathered, I'm not talking about Brock. His arm is plenty strong enough to hit every throw you need to wear a gold jacket. I'm just talking theoretically. If you HAVE to have a low trajectory to throw deep, your arm isn't as strong as someone who can easily do either.

Any science behind this? I think if someone wants to throw deep, if they have the time, and it makes sense, they "naturally" conform to throwing with a higher arc/higher trajectory. I mean that's how I feel when I play catch with the guys. If you're trying to laser it while going deep I think that actually means you have a stronger arm than most.

Yeah. Pythagoras

Which means, if you MUST throw with a low arc to get it there, your arm is weaker. (By arm strength I mean how far you can throw the ball, but I see no reason why velocity and distance would be different as a measure of arm strength unless the QB has mechanical problems which make one of either his distance or velocity throws more inefficient.)

.
.

EDIT: Just to be clear, however, I do believe that the most likely reason most of the time for why some QBs throw with a low arc and some don't is that the low arc guys either have poorer deep anticipation or don't trust their accuracy and timing as much, or fear that a super fast safety might catch up and make a play. In other words, I think a lot of low-arc deep ball guys COULD throw tear drops but choose not to.

That is not how it works for most.....

Not really replying to 5-rings here.....but anyone that is interested....

Step out side and throw the ball as far as you can.....then throw it 10 yards on a line drive....then throw it 10 yards with as much arch as you can get.... you will quickly come to the conclusions that a line drive takes more arm strength, and when you throw it as far as you can...it arch's..

Before you head back inside....pick the ball up and drop it

Pick it up again.....and drop it from over your head....

The Reason that weaker arms loft balls.....has nothing to do with Pythagoras....

The reason balls are lofted when you throw long is gravity.

Everything falls at 9.8m a second. How long the ball took to fall is all the time you have to work with.

You only have two ways to counteract how long the ball takes to fall (gravity) , throw it faster to make it go farther in the time it takes gravity pull it to the ground, or cheat....and throw it as fast as you can and as high as you can to let the forward momentum work against the added height to make the ball stay in the air longer.

When you loft a ball, you are adding sacrificial drop to buy yourself more time for the balls forward velocity to work longer.

I always thought it takes more arm strength to throw a ball "on a rope" (less arc). This is why the deep Out is the one throw that separates QBs with elite arm strength from the rest of the pack. Can't throw a deep Out with high arc since it gives the CB more time to react.
Originally posted by Chance:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49erKing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by tankle104:

Arm is definitely stronger than Montana's.

No not really. They both throw extremely catchable balls on all their different types of throws though. Both elite there.

Disagree, I remember Montana's long balls had more arch to them. Early in Montana's career (Before Rice) he had long ball issues. Which are not a big deal during the early years as he had Wendell Tyler. That Aiyuk 40+ yard throw was a flatter trajectory than Montana's usual deep throws, as I recall it.
Having a lower trajectory on deep balls all the time means your arm isn't as strong, because you have to cut out the wasted motion. You think Russell Wilson has a weak arm? His deep balls are more tear drop than anyone's I've ever seen.

The second the ball leaves your hand, the only forces working on it are gravity and friction. A high arching ball travels a further net distance than a flattened one. It takes more arm to throw more distance. QBs who depend on a flat arc for deep balls probably do not have as strong an arm as those who don't.

HOWEVER, it could also merely be a preference. The QB maybe doesn't anticipate as much as the tear drop guy and has to sling it to get it there in time, or perhaps they're paranoid about the ball taking a long time to get there.

.
.
.
EDIT: before I get tarred and feathered, I'm not talking about Brock. His arm is plenty strong enough to hit every throw you need to wear a gold jacket. I'm just talking theoretically. If you HAVE to have a low trajectory to throw deep, your arm isn't as strong as someone who can easily do either.

Any science behind this? I think if someone wants to throw deep, if they have the time, and it makes sense, they "naturally" conform to throwing with a higher arc/higher trajectory. I mean that's how I feel when I play catch with the guys. If you're trying to laser it while going deep I think that actually means you have a stronger arm than most.

Yeah. Pythagoras (Extended to curves; the same principle applies, you just add up the infinitesimal distances via a line integral, but it's essentially the same thing. In Euclidean geometry, a straight line is the shortest path between two points.). A high arcing ball travels more distance. As the ball is not getting any additional force as it leaves (basic physics), what you put into it upon release is all it has. So throwing with a high arc doesn't give you some boost. That's not how physics work. Draw a free body diagram. Only gravity and friction are of any consequence once it's released.

So, the high arcing ball is thrown further in actual distance traveled than the low arcing one.

Which means, if you MUST throw with a low arc to get it there, your arm is weaker. (By arm strength I mean how far you can throw the ball, but I see no reason why velocity and distance would be different as a measure of arm strength unless the QB has mechanical problems which make one of either his distance or velocity throws more inefficient.)

Yes, but gravity is the main factor here. If a QB threw the ball on the shortest path, a strait line, it would be impossible arm strength to accomplish on a 40 yard throw. Likewise a QB throwing the ball as high as a skyscraper and it traveling 40 yards in distance. The real measure is ball velocity as it leaves his hands a a tight rope tends to have greater velocity than a moon shot.

Humor me. The critical point is 45 degrees, IIRC.

Horizontal distance is 40 meters.

One QB throws the ball with an angle of 45 degrees. The other throws with a height of 75 degrees. Who has the greater velocity?

The formula for horizontal distance is:
R = [v^2 sin(2α)]/(g)
So v = sqrt [Rg/(sin[2α])]

R = 40.

α for the low arc is: 45 degrees (calculated using the same formula)

α for the high arc is: 75 degrees.

So the HORIZONTAL velocities are, respectfully: sqrt [40m *g/(sin[2*45])] = 19.8 m/s, and sqrt [40m*g/(sin[2*75])] = 39.6 m/s.

The interesting thing with sin is that it's a periodic function. That means there are times when a LOWER trajectory would take more initial velocity than a higher one, and there are times when a HIGHER trajectory would take more initial velocity. You brought up the fact that a zero trajectory would take infinite velocity. That's true. So would a 90 degree trajectory.

So, if the QB is throwing with an arc greater than 45 degrees, each additional degree of arc requires more arm strength. If the QB is throwing with an arc less than 45 degrees, each additional degree of arc REDUCTION requires more arm strength. Russell Wilson appears to throw with greater than 45 degree arc, so the higher he throws it, the more arm strength it takes.

I think that the truth of the matter here is that the biggest factor in arc is QB preference, and if there's a weakness or a strength with a QB who chooses one or the other, it has to be related to vision and anticipation, not arm strength.
[ Edited by 5_Golden_Rings on Oct 2, 2023 at 8:46 AM ]
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Back handed praise if you ask me.

I refuse to give that troll a click.

Same

All of this. I feel like he gets a large portion of his clicks and attention from ragefarming. I just ignore him altogether.
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
We better be #1 in power rankings tomorrow

I'm not one that really cares about early season power rankings but I could see the bills being 1. They played really well last week and Allen looked really good. It's all irrelevant at this stage - I just want us to keep winning to keep the 1 seed in our controlled destiny

They are playing great no doubt, but we be undefeated
[ Edited by DonnieDarko on Oct 2, 2023 at 8:39 AM ]
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Humor me. The critical point is 45 degrees, IIRC.

Horizontal distance is 40 meters.

One QB throws the ball with an angle of 45 degrees. The other throws with a height of 75 degrees. Who has the greater velocity?

The formula for horizontal distance is:
R = [v^2 sin(2α)]/(g)
So v = sqrt [Rg/(sin[2α])]

R = 40.

α for the low arc is: 45 degrees (calculated using the same formula)

α for the high arc is: 75 degrees.

So the HORIZONTAL velocities are, respectfully: sqrt [40m *g/(sin[2*45])] = 19.8 m/s, and sqrt [40m*g/(sin[2*75])] = 39.6 m/s.

The interesting thing with sin is that it's a periodic function. That means there are times when a LOWER trajectory would take more initial velocity than a higher one, and there are times when a HIGHER trajectory would take more initial velocity. You brought up the fact that a zero trajectory would take infinite velocity. That's true. So would a 90 degree trajectory.

So, if the QB is throwing with an arc greater than 45 degrees, each additional degree of arc requires more arm strength. If the QB is throwing with an arc less than 45 degrees, each additional degree of arc requires more arm strength. Russell Wilson appears to throw with greater than 45 degree arc, so the higher he throws it, the more arm strength it takes.

I think that the truth of the matter here is that the biggest factor in arc is QB preference, and if there's a weakness or a strength with a QB who chooses one or the other, it has to be related to vision and anticipation, not arm strength.

I'm proud of the fact I actually understood what you were saying and remembered those formulas from college.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49erKing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by tankle104:

Arm is definitely stronger than Montana's.

No not really. They both throw extremely catchable balls on all their different types of throws though. Both elite there.

Disagree, I remember Montana's long balls had more arch to them. Early in Montana's career (Before Rice) he had long ball issues. Which are not a big deal during the early years as he had Wendell Tyler. That Aiyuk 40+ yard throw was a flatter trajectory than Montana's usual deep throws, as I recall it.
Having a lower trajectory on deep balls all the time means your arm isn't as strong, because you have to cut out the wasted motion. You think Russell Wilson has a weak arm? His deep balls are more tear drop than anyone's I've ever seen.

The second the ball leaves your hand, the only forces working on it are gravity and friction. A high arching ball travels a further net distance than a flattened one. It takes more arm to throw more distance. QBs who depend on a flat arc for deep balls probably do not have as strong an arm as those who don't.

HOWEVER, it could also merely be a preference. The QB maybe doesn't anticipate as much as the tear drop guy and has to sling it to get it there in time, or perhaps they're paranoid about the ball taking a long time to get there.

.
.
.
EDIT: before I get tarred and feathered, I'm not talking about Brock. His arm is plenty strong enough to hit every throw you need to wear a gold jacket. I'm just talking theoretically. If you HAVE to have a low trajectory to throw deep, your arm isn't as strong as someone who can easily do either.

Any science behind this? I think if someone wants to throw deep, if they have the time, and it makes sense, they "naturally" conform to throwing with a higher arc/higher trajectory. I mean that's how I feel when I play catch with the guys. If you're trying to laser it while going deep I think that actually means you have a stronger arm than most.

Yeah. Pythagoras

Which means, if you MUST throw with a low arc to get it there, your arm is weaker. (By arm strength I mean how far you can throw the ball, but I see no reason why velocity and distance would be different as a measure of arm strength unless the QB has mechanical problems which make one of either his distance or velocity throws more inefficient.)

.
.

EDIT: Just to be clear, however, I do believe that the most likely reason most of the time for why some QBs throw with a low arc and some don't is that the low arc guys either have poorer deep anticipation or don't trust their accuracy and timing as much, or fear that a super fast safety might catch up and make a play. In other words, I think a lot of low-arc deep ball guys COULD throw tear drops but choose not to.

That is not how it works for most.....

Not really replying to 5-rings here.....but anyone that is interested....

Step out side and throw the ball as far as you can.....then throw it 10 yards on a line drive....then throw it 10 yards with as much arch as you can get.... you will quickly come to the conclusions that a line drive takes more arm strength, and when you throw it as far as you can...it arch's..

Before you head back inside....pick the ball up and drop it

Pick it up again.....and drop it from over your head....

The Reason that weaker arms loft balls.....has nothing to do with Pythagoras....

The reason balls are lofted when you throw long is gravity.

Everything falls at 9.8m a second. How long the ball took to fall is all the time you have to work with.

You only have two ways to counteract how long the ball takes to fall (gravity) , throw it faster to make it go farther in the time it takes gravity pull it to the ground, or cheat....and throw it as fast as you can and as high as you can to let the forward momentum work against the added height to make the ball stay in the air longer.

When you loft a ball, you are adding sacrificial drop to buy yourself more time for the balls forward velocity to work longer.

I always thought it takes more arm strength to throw a ball "on a rope" (less arc). This is why the deep Out is the one throw that separates QBs with elite arm strength from the rest of the pack. Can't throw a deep Out with high arc since it gives the CB more time to react.

See my last reply. The critical arc angle is 45 degrees. Each additional degree higher than 45 degrees takes MORE velocity to reach the target. Each additional degree LOWER than 45 degrees also takes more velocity to reach the target.

Here's two examples, each with an instance showing the statement above.

Russel Wilson, who throws with a high angle:
He throws two passes. Both travel a horizontal distance of 40 meters. Then

40 meters = [v^2 sin(2α)]/(g). Which means velocity is v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2α))]

In the instance where he throws the pass with 46 degrees of arc, his velocity is:
v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*46 degrees))]
= 19.18 m/s

In the instance where he throws the pass with 50 degrees of arc, his velocity is:

v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*50 degrees))]
v = 19.95 m/s

So he has to throw it HARDER to throw it HIGHER.

Contrast that with say, Brock. Say Brock tends to throw with an arc angle less than 45 degrees.

His first pass has an arc of 44 degrees. Then,

v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*44 degrees))]
v = 19.81 m/s

His second pass has an arc of 40 degrees. Then,

v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*40 degrees))]
v = 19.85 m/s.

So he has to throw it HARDER to throw it LOWER.

So both are actually true. It just depends on if the angle increase is above 45 degrees or below it.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
We better be #1 in power rankings tomorrow

I'm not one that really cares about early season power rankings but I could see the bills being 1. They played really well last week and Allen looked really good. It's all irrelevant at this stage - I just want us to keep winning to keep the 1 seed in our controlled destiny

They are playing great no doubt, but we be undefeated

Looked like they lost their starting corner for the season yesterday too. If things hold consistent, it'll be 49ers v bills in the super bowl. BANK ON IT.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I bet that on his 20 completions, he hit the first option maybe 10 times. I say that because, here we are scoring touchdowns.

Scheme is awesome, elite playmakers (CMC is a machine), and Brock is just reading the field really well. The pre/post snap awareness is great.

Yea. I think that's the only way you go 20 for 21. Read what's happening, play the odds.

Execution from everyone. Good stuff
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Humor me. The critical point is 45 degrees, IIRC.

Horizontal distance is 40 meters.

One QB throws the ball with an angle of 45 degrees. The other throws with a height of 75 degrees. Who has the greater velocity?

The formula for horizontal distance is:
R = [v^2 sin(2α)]/(g)
So v = sqrt [Rg/(sin[2α])]

R = 40.

α for the low arc is: 45 degrees (calculated using the same formula)

α for the high arc is: 75 degrees.

So the HORIZONTAL velocities are, respectfully: sqrt [40m *g/(sin[2*45])] = 19.8 m/s, and sqrt [40m*g/(sin[2*75])] = 39.6 m/s.

The interesting thing with sin is that it's a periodic function. That means there are times when a LOWER trajectory would take more initial velocity than a higher one, and there are times when a HIGHER trajectory would take more initial velocity. You brought up the fact that a zero trajectory would take infinite velocity. That's true. So would a 90 degree trajectory.

So, if the QB is throwing with an arc greater than 45 degrees, each additional degree of arc requires more arm strength. If the QB is throwing with an arc less than 45 degrees, each additional degree of arc requires more arm strength. Russell Wilson appears to throw with greater than 45 degree arc, so the higher he throws it, the more arm strength it takes.

I think that the truth of the matter here is that the biggest factor in arc is QB preference, and if there's a weakness or a strength with a QB who chooses one or the other, it has to be related to vision and anticipation, not arm strength.

I'm proud of the fact I actually understood what you were saying and remembered those formulas from college.

Well I actually had forgot the importance of 45 degrees until my next post. For guys like Russel Wilson who throw deep higher than 45, it takes more arm to throw higher. For guys who tend to throw below 45 on deep balls, it takes more arm to throw lower.
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Back handed praise if you ask me.

I refuse to give that troll a click.

Same

Also same. I refused to stop reading and/or share his stuff since the off season. Even when he's had a decent tweet - I just don't share it. Jerk off doesn't deserve his stuff to be shared. I hope his following shrinks and he realizes that being a 12 year old whiner isn't the way to keep a majority of adults entertained.

Douche was probably taking his dads advice, lil nepo baby cant make a career for himself
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by 49erKing:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by tankle104:

Arm is definitely stronger than Montana's.

No not really. They both throw extremely catchable balls on all their different types of throws though. Both elite there.

Disagree, I remember Montana's long balls had more arch to them. Early in Montana's career (Before Rice) he had long ball issues. Which are not a big deal during the early years as he had Wendell Tyler. That Aiyuk 40+ yard throw was a flatter trajectory than Montana's usual deep throws, as I recall it.
Having a lower trajectory on deep balls all the time means your arm isn't as strong, because you have to cut out the wasted motion. You think Russell Wilson has a weak arm? His deep balls are more tear drop than anyone's I've ever seen.

The second the ball leaves your hand, the only forces working on it are gravity and friction. A high arching ball travels a further net distance than a flattened one. It takes more arm to throw more distance. QBs who depend on a flat arc for deep balls probably do not have as strong an arm as those who don't.

HOWEVER, it could also merely be a preference. The QB maybe doesn't anticipate as much as the tear drop guy and has to sling it to get it there in time, or perhaps they're paranoid about the ball taking a long time to get there.

.
.
.
EDIT: before I get tarred and feathered, I'm not talking about Brock. His arm is plenty strong enough to hit every throw you need to wear a gold jacket. I'm just talking theoretically. If you HAVE to have a low trajectory to throw deep, your arm isn't as strong as someone who can easily do either.

Any science behind this? I think if someone wants to throw deep, if they have the time, and it makes sense, they "naturally" conform to throwing with a higher arc/higher trajectory. I mean that's how I feel when I play catch with the guys. If you're trying to laser it while going deep I think that actually means you have a stronger arm than most.

Yeah. Pythagoras

Which means, if you MUST throw with a low arc to get it there, your arm is weaker. (By arm strength I mean how far you can throw the ball, but I see no reason why velocity and distance would be different as a measure of arm strength unless the QB has mechanical problems which make one of either his distance or velocity throws more inefficient.)

.
.

EDIT: Just to be clear, however, I do believe that the most likely reason most of the time for why some QBs throw with a low arc and some don't is that the low arc guys either have poorer deep anticipation or don't trust their accuracy and timing as much, or fear that a super fast safety might catch up and make a play. In other words, I think a lot of low-arc deep ball guys COULD throw tear drops but choose not to.

That is not how it works for most.....

Not really replying to 5-rings here.....but anyone that is interested....

Step out side and throw the ball as far as you can.....then throw it 10 yards on a line drive....then throw it 10 yards with as much arch as you can get.... you will quickly come to the conclusions that a line drive takes more arm strength, and when you throw it as far as you can...it arch's..

Before you head back inside....pick the ball up and drop it

Pick it up again.....and drop it from over your head....

The Reason that weaker arms loft balls.....has nothing to do with Pythagoras....

The reason balls are lofted when you throw long is gravity.

Everything falls at 9.8m a second. How long the ball took to fall is all the time you have to work with.

You only have two ways to counteract how long the ball takes to fall (gravity) , throw it faster to make it go farther in the time it takes gravity pull it to the ground, or cheat....and throw it as fast as you can and as high as you can to let the forward momentum work against the added height to make the ball stay in the air longer.

When you loft a ball, you are adding sacrificial drop to buy yourself more time for the balls forward velocity to work longer.

Actually it does work like that, for any angle above 45 degrees of arc. It works as you describe for arcs lower than 45 degrees. And it actually is related to Pythagoras, since this is really about the sine function, and Pythagoras is encoded in the relationship between the trigonometric functions.

EDIT: to point out the extremes, and that there are TWO points where infinite velocity is needed to reach the target:

If the angle of the pass is zero degrees, you need infinite arm strength to get it to the horizontal target. But LIKEWISE, if the angle is NINETY degrees, you also need infinite arm strength to get it to the horizontal target. 45 degrees is the inflection point. The relationship reverses when you pass that mark.
[ Edited by 5_Golden_Rings on Oct 2, 2023 at 8:44 AM ]
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
See my last reply. The critical arc angle is 45 degrees. Each additional degree higher than 45 degrees takes MORE velocity to reach the target. Each additional degree LOWER than 45 degrees also takes more velocity to reach the target.

Here's two examples, each with an instance showing the statement above.

Russel Wilson, who throws with a high angle:
He throws two passes. Both travel a horizontal distance of 40 meters. Then

40 meters = [v^2 sin(2α)]/(g). Which means velocity is v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2α))]

In the instance where he throws the pass with 46 degrees of arc, his velocity is:
v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*46 degrees))]
= 19.18 m/s

In the instance where he throws the pass with 50 degrees of arc, his velocity is:

v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*50 degrees))]
v = 19.95 m/s

So he has to throw it HARDER to throw it HIGHER.

Contrast that with say, Brock. Say Brock tends to throw with an arc angle less than 45 degrees.

His first pass has an arc of 44 degrees. Then,

v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*44 degrees))]
v = 19.81 m/s

His second pass has an arc of 40 degrees. Then,

v = sqrt [(40 meters * 9.8 meters/second^2)/(sin(2*40 degrees))]
v = 19.85 m/s.

So he has to throw it HARDER to throw it LOWER.

So both are actually true. It just depends on if the angle increase is above 45 degrees or below it.

Doesn't the base required to make those throws go a lot into a QBs evaluation? For example, Brock typically has a great base and does a really good job with his mechanics to maximize his throwing accuracy and velocity. Without the great base.. he probably wouldn't have as much velocity to make the throws as easy as he does.

where as a guy like allen, regardless of his base, can make those throws no problem.

im over simplifying but isn't that usually how they determine how strong a guys arm is? Not what they can do with great mechanics but more of what they can do off platform?
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone