QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by mayo49:
Training camp is almost here, boys. Need things to speed up - love the offseason, but I need some Dirty and team news.

hey man you finally crawled out of your hidey hole... time to get back into game shape

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:

Originally posted by mayo49:
Training camp is almost here, boys. Need things to speed up - love the offseason, but I need some Dirty and team news.

hey man you finally crawled out of your hidey hole... time to get back into game shape

Yeah, took a while to get out of the cave, after the Warriors loss, lol. Good to be back with the Zoners. Your right, time to get into game shape. TC and season are around the corner.

Originally posted by Memphis9er:
It's the pertinent facts he left out that show his bias and lack of objectivity. Scoring improved almost ten points a game, passing improved outside the numbers(led the league in efficiency), 3rd down passer rating(112.8 to 132.4) as well as efficiency improved drastically(%64 to %72.9), all from a rookie qb, as opposed to a highly paid veteran. I guess if you chose to ignore those facts, then his assertion might seem true.I like to base my opinion on a summation of all available facts so I can make an informed decision though.Nobody knows if the kid is the next coming or not, only time will tell. The only people who think he and Jimmy are the same player are either uninformed, or short-sighted and only seeing what they want to see, or are flat out pushing an agenda. The willful omission of facts from an argument because they do not support your claims is flat out disingenuous.

👏👏👏 Great post! A lot of these people want to ignore the facts because they are biased and they pretend they're not. They often just say things like I just want the best quarterback to win and I just need a bigger sample size. While at the same time not admitting that sample size was so much better than Jimmy's ever could have been. A record-setting sample size for a rookie. He did not have Deebo for quite a few games as well. So they can choose to ignore facts. Plain and simple they're wrong and it shows.

Originally posted by elguapo:
👏👏👏 Great post! A lot of these people want to ignore the facts because they are biased and they pretend they're not. They often just say things like I just want the best quarterback to win and I just need a bigger sample size. While at the same time not admitting that sample size was so much better than Jimmy's ever could have been. A record-setting sample size for a rookie. He did not have Deebo for quite a few games as well. So they can choose to ignore facts. Plain and simple they're wrong and it shows.

happy bday guap

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by Memphis9er:
It's the pertinent facts he left out that show his bias and lack of objectivity. Scoring improved almost ten points a game, passing improved outside the numbers(led the league in efficiency), 3rd down passer rating(112.8 to 132.4) as well as efficiency improved drastically(%64 to %72.9), all from a rookie qb, as opposed to a highly paid veteran. I guess if you chose to ignore those facts, then his assertion might seem true.I like to base my opinion on a summation of all available facts so I can make an informed decision though.Nobody knows if the kid is the next coming or not, only time will tell. The only people who think he and Jimmy are the same player are either uninformed, or short-sighted and only seeing what they want to see, or are flat out pushing an agenda. The willful omission of facts from an argument because they do not support your claims is flat out disingenuous.

👏👏👏 Great post! A lot of these people want to ignore the facts because they are biased and they pretend they're not. They often just say things like I just want the best quarterback to win and I just need a bigger sample size. While at the same time not admitting that sample size was so much better than Jimmy's ever could have been. A record-setting sample size for a rookie. He did not have Deebo for quite a few games as well. So they can choose to ignore facts. Plain and simple they're wrong and it shows.

Someone posted that stupid video where a YouTuber claims Brock and Jimmy G are "the same guy" and I rolled my eyes, as the very stats that guy posted showed Brock ahead in all of them except TD/INT ratio, where they were even. Brock was clearly better than Jimmy last year.

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by Memphis9er:
It's the pertinent facts he left out that show his bias and lack of objectivity. Scoring improved almost ten points a game, passing improved outside the numbers(led the league in efficiency), 3rd down passer rating(112.8 to 132.4) as well as efficiency improved drastically(%64 to %72.9), all from a rookie qb, as opposed to a highly paid veteran. I guess if you chose to ignore those facts, then his assertion might seem true.I like to base my opinion on a summation of all available facts so I can make an informed decision though.Nobody knows if the kid is the next coming or not, only time will tell. The only people who think he and Jimmy are the same player are either uninformed, or short-sighted and only seeing what they want to see, or are flat out pushing an agenda. Th e willfusl omission of facts from an argument because they do not support your claims is flat out disingenuou

👏👏👏 Great post! A lot of these people want to ignore the facts because they are biased and they pretend they're not. They often just say things like I just want the best quarterback to win and I just need a bigger sample size. While at the same time not admitting that sample size was so much better than Jimmy's ever could have been. A record-setting sample size for a rookie. He did not have Deebo for quite a few games as well. So they can choose to ignore facts. Plain and simple they're wrong and it shows.

Ya know, it was just almost Montana like performance, on almost No reps. I just don't understand being a fan, if you don't get excited about that. Sure, Maybe he won't live up to it in the long run. But I doubt it. On planet Earth, being this new to the league, it is far more likely he gets better. It was not based on a limited repertoire, like Kaepernick's strong arm and good straight line speed, but no pocket presence, reading ability, touch, accuracy, or coachability, or Garoppolo's quick short game, and nothing more. Joe, I mean Brock, is based on smarts, and accuracy, and he can do it all. That means you can't just stop what he can do and then he eats it. That's the point. Defenses can stop Anything. They can't stop Everything. And Kyle and Brock's gonna make them. Joe, damn, I mean Brock, can throw deep accurately, and he can move in the pocket, and he Can read defenses, so he knows where to look if you drop two on his first look, and he Can consistently make smart decisions on busted plays.

F it. I'm gonna have some fun. Super Bowl, Here We Come. It's gonna take multiple injuries to stop us, and if that happens, I'm man enough to take it, without "protecting" myself with a pessimistic outlook. And I'm gonna have more fun than those surprised by our success behind J, Brock.

Kittle is saying pretty much what I've been saying overall. Trey is a starting caliber qb in this league, he just needs a ton of reps because he's so inexperienced. I think like two years of reps before we know what he is.

besides that, it's Brock's job to lose. If he comes back and continued where he was, that's a wrap (and stays healthy).

Originally posted by tankle104:
Kittle is saying pretty much what I've been saying overall. Trey is a starting caliber qb in this league, he just needs a ton of reps because he's so inexperienced. I think like two years of reps before we know what he is.

besides that, it's Brock's job to lose. If he comes back and continued where he was, that's a wrap (and stays healthy).

yep. Purdy #1 until he isn't.

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by tankle104:
Kittle is saying pretty much what I've been saying overall. Trey is a starting caliber qb in this league, he just needs a ton of reps because he's so inexperienced. I think like two years of reps before we know what he is.

besides that, it's Brock's job to lose. If he comes back and continued where he was, that's a wrap (and stays healthy).

yep. Purdy #1 until he isn't.

My biggest hope this year is just for the starters to stay relatively healthy. Idc who it is, just tired of losing guys for the season. Missing a couple games here and there is normal but for our IR to look like the food bank line during the Great Depression is just ridiculous.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by tankle104:
Kittle is saying pretty much what I've been saying overall. Trey is a starting caliber qb in this league, he just needs a ton of reps because he's so inexperienced. I think like two years of reps before we know what he is.

besides that, it's Brock's job to lose. If he comes back and continued where he was, that's a wrap (and stays healthy).

yep. Purdy #1 until he isn't.

My biggest hope this year is just for the starters to stay relatively healthy. Idc who it is, just tired of losing guys for the season. Missing a couple games here and there is normal but for our IR to look like the food bank line during the Great Depression is just ridiculous.

If you could guarantee me that Brock will be healthy for the next two seasons, I would consider trading Trey for the right offer. Unfortunately we don't know that to be true, and it's more likely we'll have injuries like we do every year.

Originally posted by mayo49:
Training camp is almost here, boys. Need things to speed up - love the offseason, but I need some Dirty and team news.

TC is so far away I wanna cry 😭

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:

Originally posted by tankle104:
Kittle is saying pretty much what I've been saying overall. Trey is a starting caliber qb in this league, he just needs a ton of reps because he's so inexperienced. I think like two years of reps before we know what he is.

besides that, it's Brock's job to lose. If he comes back and continued where he was, that's a wrap (and stays healthy).

yep. Purdy #1 until he isn't.

My biggest hope this year is just for the starters to stay relatively healthy. Idc who it is, just tired of losing guys for the season. Missing a couple games here and there is normal but for our IR to look like the food bank line during the Great Depression is just ridiculous.

If you could guarantee me that Brock will be healthy for the next two seasons, I would consider trading Trey for the right offer. Unfortunately we don't know that to be true, and it's more likely we'll have injuries like we do every year.

Yeah, that is something that can never be predicted. The good news is that we can keep Trey for two-three more years regardless.

I view Trey as a bigger health risk than Purdy, especially because of how he is used and his past injury issues, but both have had some bad injuries. Injuries are also unpredictable and both may never miss ankther game in their careers, who knows.

Ultimately, we can play Brock and if it doesn't go well, have Trey still being groomed in the wings. We don't have to trade him.

another question is, let's say Trey is hypothetically traded, what do we do for a backup next year? How confident are we that Darnold will be resigned? Logic tells you that if he doesn't get to play here, he will get his coaching and experience, then take it else where. Leaving us bare bones in the QB room next year.

i can see Trey being traded, but only if it's a great offer. If it isn't a great offer, then it doesn't make any sense to move on from him.

keeping Trey makes a lot of sense for the next few seasons, regarding the qb room.

"Oh yeah," said Kittle. "You win eight games in a row, it's hard to bench that guy.... He's been throwing. I think he looks good. I've seen him throw," Kittle told Patrick. "He's in a good place mentally and physically so I'm excited about that. Like I said, we were rolling with him, scoring 30 points a game. Looking forward to it."

https://49ers.pressdemocrat.com/george-kittle-expects-brock-purdy-to-be-the-49ers-week-one-starter/

Kittle knows.

https://apple.news/AeLIBcJcVTQOoBlqUfs4Mfg

i just thought it was funny that behind kyrie Irving in this picture of the article is John & Kyle. Lol

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by elguapo:
👏👏👏 Great post! A lot of these people want to ignore the facts because they are biased and they pretend they're not. They often just say things like I just want the best quarterback to win and I just need a bigger sample size. While at the same time not admitting that sample size was so much better than Jimmy's ever could have been. A record-setting sample size for a rookie. He did not have Deebo for quite a few games as well. So they can choose to ignore facts. Plain and simple they're wrong and it shows.

happy bday guap

Thanks so much Faithful6, I really appreciate you and your posts. My man We better get #6 this year and if BCB is healthy and plays at just a top 10 level we win the SB. If he plays like his elite top 1-2 level like last year…….game over man, game over