QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by DynastyPart2:
He's wrong for many reasons. The short explanation is that Brock passes the eye test. Stats can be used to make whatever case you want.

So you're biased?

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
-more athletic
-mr irrelevant
-ceiling unknown

He's a little more athletic than Jimmy. That's not some massive strength though. We're so use to literally nothing, that anything looks good lol.

I think he did mention him being mr. Irrelevant and if he's JG2.0 that's great value.

again what from what he said was wrong? Everything he stated is actually true. Stats/film back it up. Doesn't mean he can't get better. He's mostly talking about what he did and what Jimmy did.

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Everyone was claiming Jimmy was playing his best ball ever and then purdy in his first ever playing time matched it easily lol

This sums it up right here

We all thought Jimmy was playing his best ball back in 2017. So much so that we give him $125M. That turned out not being some consistent thing.

I mean the goal isn't can he be a little better than Jimmy imo. Especially if we're talking about wanting an elite FQB. We will see, BCB will get first crack at the QB1 gig. IMO he shouldn't be given the keys to the car and be able to drive it off a cliff either.

Originally posted by tankle104:
Yeah Jimmy struggled in the playoffs. What confused me is that the things he seemed to do well at, or at least serviceable in the regular season, he regressed at in the playoffs. I think Purdy like matched his stats and/or eclipsed them in one post season. Lol

Yeah but I was saying that as a general and I think the word "good" is subjective. Sometimes a qb can have average stats in a quarter or the team not score and it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't play well.

With the seattle game, he didn't have a good first quarter, for sure. Brock seemed nervous and I think he missed his first handful of easy passes and was late on a touchdown. I think his nerves were high. He started to settle down as the second quarter ended (if I remember correctly). Then he finished the game on a terror (several NFL records). Overall, no Brock didn't have 3+ good quarters of football but I wouldn't call the first half bad either. I think he was very good in the second half, so I look at it as an exception to me saying that. His first half misses were just that, poor throws, but he was reading everything right and not turning the ball over. It was just execution and he turned it around rather quickly. It wasn't something that continued on throughout the game.

the Dallas game, I think Dallas D played great. I thought they were fast, Vicious, and motivated. I was impressed. They made it a dog fight. Did Brock light it up? No, but when I look at the context of it all - playoff game, historic rival, great defense, rookie year erc.. I think he played damn good and came through when he was needed to. I give him a lot of credit for the mental aspect and staying steady to deliver when he was needed most. I wouldn't say he had a bad game at all. I also wouldn't say he had a great game. I think he had a damn good game within the context of it all.

I just want you to maintain the same context. You said 3 QRs of good football (at least) to qualify that as a good game….now if you want to all of a sudden add a bunch of context to it and break it down pass by pass. Then state that.

I do not think Brock had a very good game vs Dallas. Which if fine. That was a legit D and it was in the playoffs. Thankfully Dak was Dak. They dropped to possible back breaking INTs and Brock/Kittle made some plays at the end.

the Seattle game was inconsistent in the first half outside of CMC. No he didn't turn the ball over, but that was more on their D not catching INTs then him seeing the field/making accurate passes. Thank god for that smith fumble in the RZ, CMC having 120 rushing yards (couple explosives) and Deebo's 75 yard screen pass.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by tankle104:
Yeah Jimmy struggled in the playoffs. What confused me is that the things he seemed to do well at, or at least serviceable in the regular season, he regressed at in the playoffs. I think Purdy like matched his stats and/or eclipsed them in one post season. Lol

Yeah but I was saying that as a general and I think the word "good" is subjective. Sometimes a qb can have average stats in a quarter or the team not score and it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't play well.

With the seattle game, he didn't have a good first quarter, for sure. Brock seemed nervous and I think he missed his first handful of easy passes and was late on a touchdown. I think his nerves were high. He started to settle down as the second quarter ended (if I remember correctly). Then he finished the game on a terror (several NFL records). Overall, no Brock didn't have 3+ good quarters of football but I wouldn't call the first half bad either. I think he was very good in the second half, so I look at it as an exception to me saying that. His first half misses were just that, poor throws, but he was reading everything right and not turning the ball over. It was just execution and he turned it around rather quickly. It wasn't something that continued on throughout the game.

the Dallas game, I think Dallas D played great. I thought they were fast, Vicious, and motivated. I was impressed. They made it a dog fight. Did Brock light it up? No, but when I look at the context of it all - playoff game, historic rival, great defense, rookie year erc.. I think he played damn good and came through when he was needed to. I give him a lot of credit for the mental aspect and staying steady to deliver when he was needed most. I wouldn't say he had a bad game at all. I also wouldn't say he had a great game. I think he had a damn good game within the context of it all.

I just want you to maintain the same context. You said 3 QRs of good football (at least) to qualify that as a good game….now if you want to all of a sudden add a bunch of context to it and break it down pass by pass. Then state that.

I do not think Brock had a very good game vs Dallas. Which if fine. That was a legit D and it was in the playoffs. Thankfully Dak was Dak. They dropped to possible back breaking INTs and Brock/Kittle made some plays at the end.

the Seattle game was inconsistent in the first half outside of CMC. No he didn't turn the ball over, but that was more on their D not catching INTs then him seeing the field/making accurate passes. Thank god for that smith fumble in the RZ, CMC having 120 rushing yards (couple explosives) and Deebo's 75 yard screen pass.

Some fans have Brock elevated to god status or better than Lance no matter what. While we understand this is extremely premature and incorrect....pointing out he may not be falls on deaf ears around here.

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Yeah Jimmy struggled in the playoffs. What confused me is that the things he seemed to do well at, or at least serviceable in the regular season, he regressed at in the playoffs. I think Purdy like matched his stats and/or eclipsed them in one post season. Lol

Yeah but I was saying that as a general and I think the word "good" is subjective. Sometimes a qb can have average stats in a quarter or the team not score and it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't play well.

With the seattle game, he didn't have a good first quarter, for sure. Brock seemed nervous and I think he missed his first handful of easy passes and was late on a touchdown. I think his nerves were high. He started to settle down as the second quarter ended (if I remember correctly). Then he finished the game on a terror (several NFL records). Overall, no Brock didn't have 3+ good quarters of football but I wouldn't call the first half bad either. I think he was very good in the second half, so I look at it as an exception to me saying that. His first half misses were just that, poor throws, but he was reading everything right and not turning the ball over. It was just execution and he turned it around rather quickly. It wasn't something that continued on throughout the game.

the Dallas game, I think Dallas D played great. I thought they were fast, Vicious, and motivated. I was impressed. They made it a dog fight. Did Brock light it up? No, but when I look at the context of it all - playoff game, historic rival, great defense, rookie year erc.. I think he played damn good and came through when he was needed to. I give him a lot of credit for the mental aspect and staying steady to deliver when he was needed most. I wouldn't say he had a bad game at all. I also wouldn't say he had a great game. I think he had a damn good game within the context of it all.

I just want you to maintain the same context. You said 3 QRs of good football (at least) to qualify that as a good game….now if you want to all of a sudden add a bunch of context to it and break it down pass by pass. Then state that.

I do not think Brock had a very good game vs Dallas. Which if fine. That was a legit D and it was in the playoffs. Thankfully Dak was Dak. They dropped to possible back breaking INTs and Brock/Kittle made some plays at the end.

the Seattle game was inconsistent in the first half outside of CMC. No he didn't turn the ball over, but that was more on their D not catching INTs then him seeing the field/making accurate passes. Thank god for that smith fumble in the RZ, CMC having 120 rushing yards (couple explosives) and Deebo's 75 yard screen pass.

Some fans have Brock elevated to god status or better than Lance no matter what. While we understand this is extremely premature and incorrect....pointing out he may not be falls on deaf ears around here.

I understand the doubt from a guy like Alex Rollins, although I think he's wrong (one strange statement he made was that Brock "didn't really have an answer" for what Seattle was doing, and he's also making a mistake using numbers to say Brock can't scramble)

But the criticism within the fan base is usually brought up by fans that act like it's a rite of passage for Trey Lance to take snaps in the NFL, and often times the Brock criticism is brought up in direct defense of Trey . We all know he isn't perfect, we know he could suck going forward, but it's only fans holding out for Trey that feel the need to drag the kid down. Just let it play out, the best QB will emerge

Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

He should have just titled it this: Kyle runs this b***h!

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

He should have just titled it this: Kyle runs this b***h!

This is basically what I said. As long as we have Kyle calling plays, an elite roster, and everyone is executing the plays…it's not really gonna matter if it's BCB or JG back there. SF will score points and win games. Now when we get in the playoffs and we need the QB to make those couple special plays, can he do it? We will see.

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Some fans have Brock elevated to god status or better than Lance no matter what. While we understand this is extremely premature and incorrect....pointing out he may not be falls on deaf ears around here.

A lot of the Jimmy truthers just abandoned that ship and hopped on the BCB ship. Also toss in the fans that didn't want Lance to begin with.

BCB might be the next Burrow/Brees. I just don't see why we can't actually wait to see before just saying he is or having to go all in. What Alex said is factual. Doesn't mean he can't be the real deal either. We will find out by the end of this yr.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Some fans have Brock elevated to god status or better than Lance no matter what. While we understand this is extremely premature and incorrect....pointing out he may not be falls on deaf ears around here.

A lot of the Jimmy truthers just abandoned that ship and hopped on the BCB ship. Also toss in the fans that didn't want Lance to begin with.

BCB might be the next Burrow/Brees. I just don't see why we can't actually wait to see before just saying he is or having to go all in. What Alex said is factual. Doesn't mean he can't be the real deal either. We will find out by the end of this yr.

100% but I'm a cynic and odds tell me Brock won't end up being that good but I hope I'm wrong. Also many discount his elbow injury like it was a mosquito bite. That's a serious injury and I'm curious if his throwing is affected.

So today is my birthday and this girlfriend of mine always hears me talk about Brock Purdy and how I'm half a momo for him. Hahaha she bought me a jersey of his. So cool hahaha

Originally posted by tankle104:
So today is my birthday and this girlfriend of mine always hears me talk about Brock Purdy and how I'm half a momo for him. Hahaha she bought me a jersey of his. So cool hahaha

Congrats on getting QB1's jersey. Happy Birthday

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by tankle104:
So today is my birthday and this girlfriend of mine always hears me talk about Brock Purdy and how I'm half a momo for him. Hahaha she bought me a jersey of his. So cool hahaha

Congrats on getting QB1's jersey. Happy Birthday

Same b day as Joe Montana! Thanks my man!

Originally posted by tankle104:
So today is my birthday and this girlfriend of mine always hears me talk about Brock Purdy and how I'm half a momo for him. Hahaha she bought me a jersey of his. So cool hahaha

Happy birthday 🍻

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by DynastyPart2:
He's wrong for many reasons. The short explanation is that Brock passes the eye test. Stats can be used to make whatever case you want.

So you're biased?

I don't know what you mean by this or what you are implying.

By "The eye test", I am referring to my own personal assessment of Brock Purdy's play vs Jimmy Garappolo (since that's what we are discussing, based on the video).

Going back to just a couple plays off the top of my head from last year; to use as an example of where Brock impressed me as someone who can make plays that I feel Jimmy could not:

The pass to Kittle in the middle of the field with pressure in his face for a huge completion versus Miami.

The TD pass to Christian McCaffrey to the left pylon for a TD with a rusher in his face (I believe he injured his oblique on that play?) versus the Bucs.

So again, what do you mean by bias?