QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Path to the draft on NFLN…who's the next Brock Purdy?

Stetson Bennett or Max Duggan. I'll take either one.

Duggan can't hit the broad side of a barn.

And Josh Allen also had accuracy issues in college, point is, it can be worked on and fixed. But I mean in the 4th thru 7th rounds what QB doesn't have flaws.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.

This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.

Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.

You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.

That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.

Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.

But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.

Idk how factual this is but when I was listening to a doctor talk about the injury, he said it's super rare in the nfl because it's like a 1/10,000 chance of it happening (not sure if he was exaggerate but saying it's rare). You have to get hit right at the perfect moment where you're in a specific throwing motion. A second before or after when he got hit and he probably wouldn't of got the same injury. Wild.

San Francisco 49er QB's blow out all the odds when it comes to injury probability.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.

This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.

Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.

You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.

That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.

Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.

But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.

Idk how factual this is but when I was listening to a doctor talk about the injury, he said it's super rare in the nfl because it's like a 1/10,000 chance of it happening (not sure if he was exaggerate but saying it's rare). You have to get hit right at the perfect moment where you're in a specific throwing motion. A second before or after when he got hit and he probably wouldn't of got the same injury. Wild.

San Francisco 49er QB's blow out all the odds when it comes to injury probability.

So sad 😭😭. 5/6 years we haven't been able to have a healthy qb. Absolutely insane. Jed York needs to do some sort of forgiveness dance to the gods or something, PLEASE

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Path to the draft on NFLN…who's the next Brock Purdy?

Stetson Bennett or Max Duggan. I'll take either one.

Duggan can't hit the broad side of a barn.

And Josh Allen also had accuracy issues in college, point is, it can be worked on and fixed. But I mean in the 4th thru 7th rounds what QB doesn't have flaws.

For every Josh allen, there are a tons of people who couldn't. It's rare, very rare. Also, Josh allen resorted back to some of his accuracy issues this year without coach Daboll.

not saying he can't become more accurate but it's a risky decision and you have to have a top tier coach for it.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
which avg are you concerned about ?

I'm not concerned about any personally. I just know using the Eagles game is disingenuous

it's not and you can take that game out. If you actually look at that game it helps Brock in Completion percentage

If you guys are talking about his per game average stats, it would be misleading to include the Philly game to get an actual idea of how he was playing. He was only able to throw for a few plays. He shouldn't of even been back in the game if it wasn't such a unique situation with injuries.

a true understanding of his performance would be using the dolphins game - Dallas game. He either played the whole game or an overwhelming majority of it.

Regardless of if it makes any of his stats better or worse, it's just not an accurate representation of his performance.

this is about playoffs stats.

Feel free to show the numbers without the philly game

Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

which avg are you concerned about ?

I'm not concerned about any personally. I just know using the Eagles game is disingenuous

it's not and you can take that game out. If you actually look at that game it helps Brock in Completion percentage

If you guys are talking about his per game average stats, it would be misleading to include the Philly game to get an actual idea of how he was playing. He was only able to throw for a few plays. He shouldn't of even been back in the game if it wasn't such a unique situation with injuries.

a true understanding of his performance would be using the dolphins game - Dallas game. He either played the whole game or an overwhelming majority of it.

Regardless of if it makes any of his stats better or worse, it's just not an accurate representation of his performance.

this is about playoffs stats.

Feel free to show the numbers without the philly game

Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

since we want to cherry pick stats.. now do that just with 2022 (not including Brocks philly game for Kriz)

KC 112.
BP 107

TD%
KC 5.12
BP 5.08

INT
KC 0
BP 0

acting as if BP is far superior than KC is all opinion, not factual and disingenuous

They are about the same except we had the better team and BP is a rookie. I would be happy if Brock could have a career like KC, he may be even far superior if he keeps playing at the level he ended the season with

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
which avg are you concerned about ?

I'm not concerned about any personally. I just know using the Eagles game is disingenuous

it's not and you can take that game out. If you actually look at that game it helps Brock in Completion percentage

If you guys are talking about his per game average stats, it would be misleading to include the Philly game to get an actual idea of how he was playing. He was only able to throw for a few plays. He shouldn't of even been back in the game if it wasn't such a unique situation with injuries.

a true understanding of his performance would be using the dolphins game - Dallas game. He either played the whole game or an overwhelming majority of it.

Regardless of if it makes any of his stats better or worse, it's just not an accurate representation of his performance.

this is about playoffs stats.

Feel free to show the numbers without the philly game

Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

since we want to cherry pick stats.. now do that just with 2022 (not including Brocks philly game for Kriz)

KC 112.
BP 107

TD%
KC 5.12
BP 5.08

INT
KC 0
BP 0

acting as if BP is far superior than KC is all opinion, not factual and disingenuous

They are about the same except we had the better team and BP is a rookie. I would be happy if Brock could have a career like KC, he may be even far superior if he keeps playing at the level he ended the season with

I didn't "act like" anything, I said Brock's Career Playoff Stats > Kirk's Playoff Stats. That is a straightforward statement, there is no acting involved.

Now you are trying to change what posted into something ypu can argue against which is hilarious.

No need to change the parameters of what I posted.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

which avg are you concerned about ?

I'm not concerned about any personally. I just know using the Eagles game is disingenuous

it's not and you can take that game out. If you actually look at that game it helps Brock in Completion percentage

If you guys are talking about his per game average stats, it would be misleading to include the Philly game to get an actual idea of how he was playing. He was only able to throw for a few plays. He shouldn't of even been back in the game if it wasn't such a unique situation with injuries.

a true understanding of his performance would be using the dolphins game - Dallas game. He either played the whole game or an overwhelming majority of it.

Regardless of if it makes any of his stats better or worse, it's just not an accurate representation of his performance.

this is about playoffs stats.

Feel free to show the numbers without the philly game

Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

since we want to cherry pick stats.. now do that just with 2022 (not including Brocks philly game for Kriz)

KC 112.
BP 107

TD%
KC 5.12
BP 5.08

INT
KC 0
BP 0

acting as if BP is far superior than KC is all opinion, not factual and disingenuous

They are about the same except we had the better team and BP is a rookie. I would be happy if Brock could have a career like KC, he may be even far superior if he keeps playing at the level he ended the season with

I didn't "act like" anything, I said Brock's Career Playoff Stats > Kirk's Playoff Stats. That is a straightforward statement, there is no acting involved.

Now you are trying to change what posted into something ypu can argue against which is hilarious.

No need to change the parameters of what I posted.

what lol you made a not so great statement, then took forever to cherry pick the stats YOU like

I just showed you the stats you like and now you don't like them.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
which avg are you concerned about ?

I'm not concerned about any personally. I just know using the Eagles game is disingenuous

it's not and you can take that game out. If you actually look at that game it helps Brock in Completion percentage

If you guys are talking about his per game average stats, it would be misleading to include the Philly game to get an actual idea of how he was playing. He was only able to throw for a few plays. He shouldn't of even been back in the game if it wasn't such a unique situation with injuries.

a true understanding of his performance would be using the dolphins game - Dallas game. He either played the whole game or an overwhelming majority of it.

Regardless of if it makes any of his stats better or worse, it's just not an accurate representation of his performance.

this is about playoffs stats.

Feel free to show the numbers without the philly game

Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

since we want to cherry pick stats.. now do that just with 2022 (not including Brocks philly game for Kriz)

KC 112.
BP 107

TD%
KC 5.12
BP 5.08

INT
KC 0
BP 0

acting as if BP is far superior than KC is all opinion, not factual and disingenuous

They are about the same except we had the better team and BP is a rookie. I would be happy if Brock could have a career like KC, he may be even far superior if he keeps playing at the level he ended the season with

I didn't "act like" anything, I said Brock's Career Playoff Stats > Kirk's Playoff Stats. That is a straightforward statement, there is no acting involved.

Now you are trying to change what posted into something ypu can argue against which is hilarious.

No need to change the parameters of what I posted.

what lol you made a not so great statement, then took forever to cherry pick the stats YOU like

I just showed you the stats you like and now you don't like them.

What stats don't I like?

Brock's overall playoff statistics are better than Kirk's. Passer rating reflects the gap pretty well.
I also think TDs and INTs are valuable indicators. Which of Kirk's career postseason stats even things out in your opinion?

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.

This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.

Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.

You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.

That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.

Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.

But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.

Idk how factual this is but when I was listening to a doctor talk about the injury, he said it's super rare in the nfl because it's like a 1/10,000 chance of it happening (not sure if he was exaggerate but saying it's rare). You have to get hit right at the perfect moment where you're in a specific throwing motion. A second before or after when he got hit and he probably wouldn't of got the same injury. Wild.

San Francisco 49er QB's blow out all the odds when it comes to injury probability.

So sad 😭😭. 5/6 years we haven't been able to have a healthy qb. Absolutely insane. Jed York needs to do some sort of forgiveness dance to the gods or something, PLEASE

I don't think it's the medical team or anything, I just think it's been bad luck.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.

This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.

Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.

You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.

That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.

Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.

But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.

Idk how factual this is but when I was listening to a doctor talk about the injury, he said it's super rare in the nfl because it's like a 1/10,000 chance of it happening (not sure if he was exaggerate but saying it's rare). You have to get hit right at the perfect moment where you're in a specific throwing motion. A second before or after when he got hit and he probably wouldn't of got the same injury. Wild.

San Francisco 49er QB's blow out all the odds when it comes to injury probability.

So sad 😭😭. 5/6 years we haven't been able to have a healthy qb. Absolutely insane. Jed York needs to do some sort of forgiveness dance to the gods or something, PLEASE

I don't think it's the medical team or anything, I just think it's been bad luck.

I agree, it's definitely bad luck. Especially the injured we've had. The only one that would maybe be a players fault was when jimmy tried to shoulder a linebacker and got his acl torn. That's still bad luck but he could of easily avoided that situation and ran out of bounds.

let's hope our boys luck is much improved this year!

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

which avg are you concerned about ?

I'm not concerned about any personally. I just know using the Eagles game is disingenuous

it's not and you can take that game out. If you actually look at that game it helps Brock in Completion percentage

If you guys are talking about his per game average stats, it would be misleading to include the Philly game to get an actual idea of how he was playing. He was only able to throw for a few plays. He shouldn't of even been back in the game if it wasn't such a unique situation with injuries.

a true understanding of his performance would be using the dolphins game - Dallas game. He either played the whole game or an overwhelming majority of it.

Regardless of if it makes any of his stats better or worse, it's just not an accurate representation of his performance.

this is about playoffs stats.

Feel free to show the numbers without the philly game

Passer Rating
Cousins 93.7
Purdy 107.3

TD%
Cousins 3.2
Purdy 4.8

INT%
Cousins .6
Purdy 0

Brocks's playoff stats are superior to Kirk's.

since we want to cherry pick stats.. now do that just with 2022 (not including Brocks philly game for Kriz)

KC 112.
BP 107

TD%
KC 5.12
BP 5.08

INT
KC 0
BP 0

acting as if BP is far superior than KC is all opinion, not factual and disingenuous

They are about the same except we had the better team and BP is a rookie. I would be happy if Brock could have a career like KC, he may be even far superior if he keeps playing at the level he ended the season with

I didn't "act like" anything, I said Brock's Career Playoff Stats > Kirk's Playoff Stats. That is a straightforward statement, there is no acting involved.

Now you are trying to change what posted into something ypu can argue against which is hilarious.

No need to change the parameters of what I posted.

what lol you made a not so great statement, then took forever to cherry pick the stats YOU like

I just showed you the stats you like and now you don't like them.

What stats don't I like?

Brock's overall playoff statistics are better than Kirk's. Passer rating reflects the gap pretty well.
I also think TDs and INTs are valuable indicators. Which of Kirk's career postseason stats even things out in your opinion?

you don't like the numbers for 2022 playoffs of the stats you picked.

since they haven't played the same number of games, i tried showing you they are pretty similar in a per game view. which you don't like also. They aren't bad numbers

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

How quarterbacks performed this past season compared to the other quarterbacks on their team pic.twitter.com/JGqz4i96Yd

— SumerSports (@sumersports) April 7, 2023

One dot.