There are 256 users in the forums
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
He is The One.
Brock Purdy: I have to "hammer away" at footwork this offseason. https://t.co/9sR4pfH2Rm
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) April 5, 2023
love this kids energy. He's got the enthusiasm of Jim Harbaugh but the skillset of... dare I say, Drew Brees?
Originally posted by Waterbear:Hey Brock, don't tell me…
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
He is The One.
Brock Purdy: I have to "hammer away" at footwork this offseason. https://t.co/9sR4pfH2Rm
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) April 5, 2023
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:It's relevant because if you were a stat guy, you wouldn't have said thatOriginally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:because you're not a stat guy lolOriginally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:more into feelingsOriginally posted by random49er:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Brock already has better career playoff statistics than Cousins.
Hmmmm. So you are into career playoff statistics?
LOL at you talking about me instead of the post. So weird.
Why do you think playoff statistics are feelings rather than statistical facts?
That is your response to a post where I mentioned stats? How is this relevant?
Originally posted by TheWooLick:nope just talking about your non stat post
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:It's relevant because if you were a stat guy, you wouldn't have said that
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:because you're not a stat guy lol
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by random49er:more into feelings
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Brock already has better career playoff statistics than Cousins.
Hmmmm. So you are into career playoff statistics?
LOL at you talking about me instead of the post. So weird.
Why do you think playoff statistics are feelings rather than statistical facts?
That is your response to a post where I mentioned stats? How is this relevant?
You keep talking about me and what I posted that you disagree with .
I pointed out that Brock's playoff stats are better than Kirk's, what do you disagree with?
You seem to want to talk about what you think about me rather than about Brock or my post.
That is against the Forum Rules.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:nope just talking about your non stat postOriginally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:It's relevant because if you were a stat guy, you wouldn't have said thatOriginally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:because you're not a stat guy lolOriginally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:more into feelingsOriginally posted by random49er:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Brock already has better career playoff statistics than Cousins.
Hmmmm. So you are into career playoff statistics?
LOL at you talking about me instead of the post. So weird.
Why do you think playoff statistics are feelings rather than statistical facts?
That is your response to a post where I mentioned stats? How is this relevant?
You keep talking about me and what I posted that you disagree with .
I pointed out that Brock's playoff stats are better than Kirk's, what do you disagree with?
You seem to want to talk about what you think about me rather than about Brock or my post.
That is against the Forum Rules.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Who cares?
That has nothing to do with Brock.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Who cares?
That has nothing to do with Brock.
Shows your inconsistency is all. Stats seemed to matter with Brock but with the previous guy they didn't.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
I disagree
Why do you want to talk about other qbs or what I posted about them here, what does that have to do with my post about Brock having better stats than Kirk?
Winning % is definitely a stat that favors Brock over Kirk.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:Originally posted by TheWooLick:I disagree
Why do you want to talk about other qbs or what I posted about them here, what does that have to do with my post about Brock having better stats than Kirk?
Winning % is definitely a stat that favors Brock over Kirk.
Because if you continually flip flop your standards on how you judge players you can't be taken seriously.
Originally posted by ninerfan818:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by random49er:more into feelings
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Brock already has better career playoff statistics than Cousins.
Hmmmm. So you are into career playoff statistics?
Better than Jimmie's too, sadly. 😭
Take all of this with a grain of salt. Had Cous8ns been on this team with this system, no saying what he could do.
Not saying Brock didn't crush it, he did but this is a super QB friendly offense. Ask yourself, would Brock have excelled somewhere without these tools. Who knows.
Originally posted by WildBill:
We don't know how Brock is going to play after the injury. Plus will he suffer the sophomore jinx after teams have a enough film to dissect his play. Only time will tell.
With that said, all this talk about Aaron or Kirk is just chatter for the media. They need to resign Bosa for one and just signed Hargrave. The other is that they are old.
No to either as far as I am concerned.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly
Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.
Brock >>> Cousins
Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.
He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.
No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.
Brock never folded.
He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.
This is such a dumb comment.
QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.
Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.
QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.
This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.
Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.
You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.
That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.
Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.
But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.
Originally posted by 49ersRing:Originally posted by genus49:Originally posted by 49ersRing:Originally posted by genus49:Originally posted by 49ersRing:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49ersRing:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by 49ersRing:Originally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly
Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.
Brock >>> Cousins
Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.
He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.
No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.
Brock never folded.
He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.
This is such a dumb comment.
QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.
Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.
QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.
This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.
Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.
You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.
That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.
Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.
But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.
Brock already had two more injuries in 8 games than Cousins had in the last 8 years. You'd think that 49er fans, more than anyone else, would appreciate the value of durability. Sure, Purdy's injury in the NFCCG was fluky. All of Jimmy's injuries were pretty fluky on their own too, but they still kept happening. Some guys are clearly either more durable or do a better job of avoiding injury than others. The book is still open on Purdy's durability, but Cousins has proven to be durable over many years. QBs can do a lot to reduce their chance of injury including getting rid of the ball quickly, sliding, etc. Neither Trey or Purdy have demonstrated that they're particularly good at self-preservation.
Whether Purdy is better than Cousins is irrelevant (but its debatable since Purdy has such has a small sample size and played on a team with more talent than Cousins has ever played with.) I feel pretty confident that Cousins would have given us a better chance of winning the NFCCG than a mix of Purdy and Josh Johnson. I just want a QB that stays on the field.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly
Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.
Brock >>> Cousins
Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.
He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.
No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.
Brock never folded.
He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.
This is such a dumb comment.
QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.
Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.
QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.
This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.
Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.
You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.
That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.
Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.
But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.
Brock already had two more injuries in 8 games than Cousins had in the last 8 years. You'd think that 49er fans, more than anyone else, would appreciate the value of durability. Sure, Purdy's injury in the NFCCG was fluky. All of Jimmy's injuries were pretty fluky on their own too, but they still kept happening. Some guys are clearly either more durable or do a better job of avoiding injury than others. The book is still open on Purdy's durability, but Cousins has proven to be durable over many years. QBs can do a lot to reduce their chance of injury including getting rid of the ball quickly, sliding, etc. Neither Trey or Purdy have demonstrated that they're particularly good at self-preservation.
Whether Purdy is better than Cousins is irrelevant (but its debatable since Purdy has such has a small sample size and played on a team with more talent than Cousins has ever played with.) I feel pretty confident that Cousins would have given us a better chance of winning the NFCCG than a mix of Purdy and Josh Johnson. I just want a QB that stays on the field.
But Cousins is expensive, old and mediocre.
