There are 264 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

But who cares if Cousins can't win that game against the Eagles?

I don't care about Cousins health, he just isn't very good and is way overpaid.

We don't know what Cousins would do on this team. He's never had the #1 overall defense and an offense with this much talent around him.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

But who cares if Cousins can't win that game against the Eagles?

I don't care about Cousins health, he just isn't very good and is way overpaid.

We don't know what Cousins would do on this team. He's never had the #1 overall defense and an offense with this much talent around him.

I've seen a lot of his games and my issue with him is when he plays a top defense, he is awful. It's one thing to not have a great game, but he's bad when playing a top defense.

it's a good manager, that's all. I'd be really bummed if we got him. I'm seeing reports now we may get Rodgers.. where is this crap coming from?
Originally posted by tankle104:
I've seen a lot of his games and my issue with him is when he plays a top defense, he is awful. It's one thing to not have a great game, but he's bad when playing a top defense.

it's a good manager, that's all. I'd be really bummed if we got him. I'm seeing reports now we may get Rodgers.. where is this crap coming from?

The Rodgers stuff is coming from the fact that Green Bay has little leverage. The reason they have little leverage is they publicly have referred to him in the past tense, and said their top option is him not returning. I don't think they can cut him tho, due to the cap complications. They need a trade partner. Rodgers has openly said he wants to play for NYJ. NYJ doesn't want to give up much, as GB doesn't really have options here. I imagine GB (or someone) is leaking Rodgers may be traded elsewhere, to get NYJ to up their ante. They are putting our name in the mix cuz BP is hurt, TL not looking great, etc.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by tankle104:
I've seen a lot of his games and my issue with him is when he plays a top defense, he is awful. It's one thing to not have a great game, but he's bad when playing a top defense.

it's a good manager, that's all. I'd be really bummed if we got him. I'm seeing reports now we may get Rodgers.. where is this crap coming from?

The Rodgers stuff is coming from the fact that Green Bay has little leverage. The reason they have little leverage is they publicly have referred to him in the past tense, and said their top option is him not returning. I don't think they can cut him tho, due to the cap complications. They need a trade partner. Rodgers has openly said he wants to play for NYJ. NYJ doesn't want to give up much, as GB doesn't really have options here. I imagine GB (or someone) is leaking Rodgers may be traded elsewhere, to get NYJ to up their ante. They are putting our name in the mix cuz BP is hurt, TL not looking great, etc.

That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.
Originally posted by tankle104:
That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.

though it was

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.


Brock already has better career playoff statistics than Cousins.
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

But who cares if Cousins can't win that game against the Eagles?

I don't care about Cousins health, he just isn't very good and is way overpaid.

We don't know what Cousins would do on this team. He's never had the #1 overall defense and an offense with this much talent around him.

He would be mediocre. His defense doesn't cause him to fold.

Dude us overpriced and old.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by tankle104:
That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.

though it was


Of course, because no one here wanted him.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by tankle104:
That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.

though it was


Of course, because no one here wanted him.

He can take his insane salary and go get butt hurt by the NY media. Lol it'll be interesting how he handles it because Green Bay has probably the smallest media presence in the league and he comes off as very sensitive to criticism.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by tankle104:
That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.

though it was


Of course, because no one here wanted him.

He can take his insane salary and go get butt hurt by the NY media. Lol it'll be interesting how he handles it because Green Bay has probably the smallest media presence in the league and he comes off as very sensitive to criticism.

Not only do they have a small media presence, but the media in WI is bullied by the local sports teams and especially the Packers. You'll not find many sports writers in WI with much to say about the Packers that could be construed as negative.
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.

This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.

Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.

You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.

That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.

Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.

But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
BCB is gonna be back... if we get Cousins then there is no rush to bring him back too quickly and let his elbow heal properly

Cousins is old mediocre and expensive.

Brock >>> Cousins

Cousins has played in 16 or more games in 8 straight seasons. Brock already has had more significant injuries than Cousins has had during that time. If we can trade for Cousins, we should do it. He may be only slightly better than Jimmy, but at least he's reliable which is more than any other QB in the KS era can say.

He folds like cheap suit in big games.
Paying top dollar for a QB should get you top qb play, not average play.

No different than the other QBs we've had under Kyle. At least he stays healthy.

Brock never folded.

He kind of did against the Eagles. Part of winning big games is staying in them. We can say its a fluke injury, but its the kind of fluke that Cousins has avoided for 8 straight years whereas Brock was injured twice in 8 games.

This is such a dumb comment.

QBs can get injured at any point. That injury was super friggin flukey and Cousins sucking in big moments is way worse than Brock getting injured. Brock played in more games this season than Kirk did his first 2 years in the league anyways.

Not to mention Brock literally didn't fold. Hell if he folded on that play he wouldn't have gotten injured. Dude stood in there and took a hit.

QBs can get injured at any point, but some QBs clearly get injured more often than others. Brock also turned the ball over on that play, which was not exactly a great sign even before it turned out he was injured.

This is the same stupid logic that had people calling Bosa injury prone after his ACL tear. I don't care who you are but if you get hit at a certain point in the right spot or get enough weight on you in a certain spot you're getting injured.

Brock took a shot to the perfect spot at his most vulnerable point during the delivery. I highly doubt any QB is able to hold onto the ball there.

You equating an injury to folding is beyond crazy. If anything he didn't get the ball out with anticipation or spotted Reddick in time to try to protect himself and live to play another down.

That's more of a rookie mistake and not even anything crazy than anywhere near "folding". Like I said before folding actually would've been better on that play.

Cousins hasn't shown anything he can do better than what Brock did as a rookie and that's kind of crazy to think about given how many more games Kirk has played. Yes he's stayed healthy so perhaps there's a feather in his cap there but the way our season went last year…Cousins probably walks away on a stretcher as well. Then again maybe because he actually folds hed manage to stay healthy.

But no matter how you slice it…Brock > Cousins.

Idk how factual this is but when I was listening to a doctor talk about the injury, he said it's super rare in the nfl because it's like a 1/10,000 chance of it happening (not sure if he was exaggerate but saying it's rare). You have to get hit right at the perfect moment where you're in a specific throwing motion. A second before or after when he got hit and he probably wouldn't of got the same injury. Wild.
Originally posted by WINiner:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by tankle104:
That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.

though it was


Of course, because no one here wanted him.

He can take his insane salary and go get butt hurt by the NY media. Lol it'll be interesting how he handles it because Green Bay has probably the smallest media presence in the league and he comes off as very sensitive to criticism.

Not only do they have a small media presence, but the media in WI is bullied by the local sports teams and especially the Packers. You'll not find many sports writers in WI with much to say about the Packers that could be construed as negative.

Maybe it's because they don't have any Grant Cohn's that only look for the negative things to report. Which is pretty far fetched 97% of the time.
Originally posted by braap49er:
Originally posted by WINiner:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by tankle104:
That can be squashed quickly though by Rodgers. He just has to say he will retire unless it's New York. I'm sure he would be interested in signing here but there is no way we can take his massive salary on, at least I don't think.

though it was


Of course, because no one here wanted him.

He can take his insane salary and go get butt hurt by the NY media. Lol it'll be interesting how he handles it because Green Bay has probably the smallest media presence in the league and he comes off as very sensitive to criticism.

Not only do they have a small media presence, but the media in WI is bullied by the local sports teams and especially the Packers. You'll not find many sports writers in WI with much to say about the Packers that could be construed as negative.

Maybe it's because they don't have any Grant Cohn's that only look for the negative things to report. Which is pretty far fetched 97% of the time.

That's why I like to follow David Lombardi. He's much more of an optimist and talks about the positives of things much more than negatives. He also does a really good job explaining things about the salary cap, which is something I'm not too educated on. So I enjoy hearing about that stuff.

i don't agree with everything he says, but then again, there aren't many people I agree on everything with. Nothing wrong with that. It's fun to talk through different perspectives and learn.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone