All Pro OT Trent Williams | Page 513

Jcool · 2020-04-25T09:08:51-07:00

Finally: The #Redskins have agreed to terms on a trade of LT Trent Williams to the #49ers, per me, @TomPelissero & @MikeGarafolo. It took until Day 3 of the Draft, but Washington gets it done, and SF gets help at a position of need. It's for a 5th this year and 3rd next year.— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) April 25, 2020

Sep 12, 2025 at 10:18 PM

#7681

9erson3
Veteran
Posts: 7,068

Originally posted by saj4423:
what did Walsh always say? Walk away a year or 2 early rather then keep the player to long. With that new contract we should have all seen they should have cut him. Warrior in his time HOFer but his time has past.

I believe this was Bill B logic as well.

Sep 12, 2025 at 11:11 PM

#7682

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 5,254

Originally posted by 9erson3:

Originally posted by saj4423:
what did Walsh always say? Walk away a year or 2 early rather then keep the player to long. With that new contract we should have all seen they should have cut him. Warrior in his time HOFer but his time has past.

I believe this was Bill B logic as well.

Should have trade CMC and Kittle while we had the chance too

Sep 13, 2025 at 7:19 AM

#7683

replikante
Veteran
Posts: 211

Originally posted by Since07:

Originally posted by 9erson3:

Originally posted by saj4423:
what did Walsh always say? Walk away a year or 2 early rather then keep the player to long. With that new contract we should have all seen they should have cut him. Warrior in his time HOFer but his time has past.

I believe this was Bill B logic as well.

Should have trade CMC and Kittle while we had the chance too

Sep 13, 2025 at 7:21 AM

#7684

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 26,503

Originally posted by Since07:
Should have trade CMC and Kittle while we had the chance too

Im with you on CMC. Don't want to see Kittle anywhere else. I wish we would have let Juice walk and drafted Kittle's eventual replacement. Would look really nice the next 4 weeks.

Sep 13, 2025 at 8:20 AM

#7685

frenchmov
Veteran
Posts: 6,978

Originally posted by krizay:
Im with you on CMC. Don't want to see Kittle anywhere else. I wish we would have let Juice walk and drafted Kittle's eventual replacement. Would look really nice the next 4 weeks.

We tried to let juice walk!

Sep 13, 2025 at 8:45 AM

#7686

SanDiego49er
Veteran
Posts: 52,225

I'm sure we will go 10 more years and not pick an OT high. That will be the solution of this regime.

Sep 13, 2025 at 8:46 AM

#7687

philgardis49
Veteran
Posts: 435

Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
He might be better at his natural position than he is at where they put him at times, but that's really not saying much But I kinda get what you're saying... maybe just kept him at LT and developed him there instead of switching him around. That definitely could've helped. But you know the staff #FAFO

I wish they would've drafted a couple more (didn't have to be early rounds) and tucked them on the PS to groom. I think they might try to buy one (like Trent) instead of develop one from day one, but wth do I know

Im with you on this. I think at the trade deadline they will pluck someone off of a team that is rebuilding who fits our scheme since that would be way faster than developing the player themselves.

Sep 13, 2025 at 9:40 AM

#7688

Scoots
Veteran
Posts: 2,580

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by Since07:
Should have trade CMC and Kittle while we had the chance too

Im with you on CMC. Don't want to see Kittle anywhere else. I wish we would have let Juice walk and drafted Kittle's eventual replacement. Would look really nice the next 4 weeks.

Do you not understand sarcasm?

Sep 13, 2025 at 12:57 PM

#7689

Hoovtrain
Veteran
Posts: 34,907

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
They have to get a LT of the future in the pipeline this offseason. This guy is so unreliable

Burford is your man!

I don't know about HAVE TO ... but it would certainly be nice. They didn't have one when they traded for Trent.

They absolutely have to, regardless if injuries. Whether it be draft or a trade . He's not getting any younger and it's a strong draft class

Can't force it. If there isn't the right player there in the first 3 rounds you don't reach for need. Need is fine after that.

I agree about not forcing it, but the opportunity should be there for them to not have to reach. Regardless of how they do it, they need to get a LT of the future whether it be draft, FA or trade.

Sep 13, 2025 at 1:09 PM

#7690

9ers4eva
Veteran
Posts: 22,519

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
I agree about not forcing it, but the opportunity should be there for them to not have to reach. Regardless of how they do it, they need to get a LT of the future whether it be draft, FA or trade.

There should be a good opportunity in this draft. Solid depth at the postion.

Sep 13, 2025 at 1:38 PM

#7691

Scoots
Veteran
Posts: 2,580

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
They have to get a LT of the future in the pipeline this offseason. This guy is so unreliable

Burford is your man!

I don't know about HAVE TO ... but it would certainly be nice. They didn't have one when they traded for Trent.

They absolutely have to, regardless if injuries. Whether it be draft or a trade . He's not getting any younger and it's a strong draft class

Can't force it. If there isn't the right player there in the first 3 rounds you don't reach for need. Need is fine after that.

I agree about not forcing it, but the opportunity should be there for them to not have to reach. Regardless of how they do it, they need to get a LT of the future whether it be draft, FA or trade.

Agreed.

Sep 13, 2025 at 2:22 PM

#7692

Hoovtrain
Veteran
Posts: 34,907

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
They have to get a LT of the future in the pipeline this offseason. This guy is so unreliable

Burford is your man!

I don't know about HAVE TO ... but it would certainly be nice. They didn't have one when they traded for Trent.

They absolutely have to, regardless if injuries. Whether it be draft or a trade . He's not getting any younger and it's a strong draft class

Can't force it. If there isn't the right player there in the first 3 rounds you don't reach for need. Need is fine after that.

I agree about not forcing it, but the opportunity should be there for them to not have to reach. Regardless of how they do it, they need to get a LT of the future whether it be draft, FA or trade.

Agreed.

Should be an interesting offseason with ample opportunities to fill remaining holes. Lots of picks and good amount of cap space

Sep 13, 2025 at 2:24 PM

#7693

Hoovtrain
Veteran
Posts: 34,907

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
I agree about not forcing it, but the opportunity should be there for them to not have to reach. Regardless of how they do it, they need to get a LT of the future whether it be draft, FA or trade.

There should be a good opportunity in this draft. Solid depth at the postion.

Off topic, but don't you think it's odd the rams do TC at LMU? (sorry we are both alumni)

Sep 13, 2025 at 3:23 PM

#7694

CatchMaster80
Veteran
Posts: 20,439

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by Scoots:

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
They have to get a LT of the future in the pipeline this offseason. This guy is so unreliable

Burford is your man!

I don't know about HAVE TO ... but it would certainly be nice. They didn't have one when they traded for Trent.

They absolutely have to, regardless if injuries. Whether it be draft or a trade . He's not getting any younger and it's a strong draft class

Can't force it. If there isn't the right player there in the first 3 rounds you don't reach for need. Need is fine after that.

I agree about not forcing it, but the opportunity should be there for them to not have to reach. Regardless of how they do it, they need to get a LT of the future whether it be draft, FA or trade.

Agreed.

Should be an interesting offseason with ample opportunities to fill remaining holes. Lots of picks and good amount of cap space

Except there are bound to be some new holes with some players leaving or getting injured and unable to start the season next year. NFL teams are on a constant state of turmoil. Then you end up having to fill a different spot than you may have wanted to.

Sep 13, 2025 at 6:41 PM

#7695

tohara3
Veteran
Posts: 30,687

Originally posted by philgardis49:

Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
He might be better at his natural position than he is at where they put him at times, but that's really not saying much But I kinda get what you're saying... maybe just kept him at LT and developed him there instead of switching him around. That definitely could've helped. But you know the staff #FAFO

I wish they would've drafted a couple more (didn't have to be early rounds) and tucked them on the PS to groom. I think they might try to buy one (like Trent) instead of develop one from day one, but wth do I know

Im with you on this. I think at the trade deadline they will pluck someone off of a team that is rebuilding who fits our scheme since that would be way faster than developing the player themselves.

This would be really nice to do