Originally posted by Niner4Life21_:
Originally posted by Afrikan:
So to explain some of my posts, or the things you pointed out...
as far as "innocent", I'm not saying Aiyuk is innocent... but I just don't think folks should lose their s**t when we don't know everything. Have a personal hatred to Aiyuk for being a "thief" or some other bad stuff that has been said about him since his injury or what has happened recently.
As far as me mentioning "black/african". You asked me if I thought he was a victim. I responded how I view certain things. If it were true that Aiyuk did something that voided his contract, even if other players were not held to the same standard, then I don't view him or anyone similar as a victim. You worry about yourself, you cover your ass. But I also understand if he felt some kind of way, if he were treated differently than other players. I can understand his right to approach it how he wants to, as long as he can live with what the future might hold. And I think he can.
as far as "innocent", I'm not saying Aiyuk is innocent... but I just don't think folks should lose their s**t when we don't know everything. Have a personal hatred to Aiyuk for being a "thief" or some other bad stuff that has been said about him since his injury or what has happened recently.
Fair enough.
As far as me mentioning "black/african". You asked me if I thought he was a victim. I responded how I view certain things. If it were true that Aiyuk did something that voided his contract, even if other players were not held to the same standard, then I don't view him or anyone similar as a victim. You worry about yourself, you cover your ass. But I also understand if he felt some kind of way, if he were treated differently than other players. I can understand his right to approach it how he wants to, as long as he can live with what the future might hold. And I think he can.
Disagree here. It is possible that he may have been subjected to a punishment (voiding of guarantees) for an action that others may have committed without such punishment (failing to meet team guidelines for injury recovery). With that said, I strongly believe that the reason for Aiyuk being treated differently (which is hypothetical) was his demeanor, antics and overall lack of commitment to the team and culture. He has a right to believe his treatment was due to race (again, hypothetical that he even sees it this way), but that doesn't necessarily mean it is a valid assessment of the situation. So I guess we can agree to disagree on this one.
I'll add my two cents here. Aiyuk fancies himself as an elite #1 WR who should be the focal point of an offensive attack. In 2023, the 49ers also had George Kittle and CMC, who are both arguably HOF calibre playmakers, and Deebo who was still balling, who WERE the focal point of the 49ers offense. That's a lot of great playmakers with not a lot of touches to go around. Can you blame the team for prioritizing CMC? Hell no. Maybe there should have been less Deebo and more Aiyuk, but that's not how it unfolded.
Fast forward, and Aiyuk wants a contract befitting his eliteness as a WR AND he wants status as the focal point of an offense. The 49ers made a decision that they were going to be a run-heavy team with playaction off it and would feature CMC and Kittle. So questions all around. If the 49ers wanted this type of offense, why pay Aiyuk so much money?
I think BA was upset because he wanted respect befitting his elite status and this team wasn't built to give Aiyuk the ball often. He never showed the maturity to deal with it and the team shouldn't have extended the guy.