Originally posted by miked1978:
__PRESENT__PRESENT
Originally posted by WINiner:
I don't think most teams are surprised when negotiations with some players are more difficult than others. The 49ers should have a plan in place to address those situations early. At this point, the 49ers have set the precedence that if you hold out all off and push them to the wire the 49ers buckle and players get closer to what they want than the team does in contract negotiations.
It all depends if they view you as a building block or not and also every team has this issue so there really isn't a tried and true way to handle this. If you become too much of a hard a** then the agents aren't going to want to deal with you and direct their clients elsewhere.
Just look at the Eagles and the Reddick situation last year. They traded for him and he sat out out because he didnt get a new contract. The Eagles stood firm but had egg on their face the entire time untill he finally showed up in week 7 or 8. Can you imagine how bad it would be here if we traded for a player and they didnt even show up?
__PRESENT
I think you meant the Jets.
But I agree with your point. It's a hard line and teams have to find it. Part of the issue is players know when they have all the leverage. CMC knew it, Trent knew it. I find it hard to fault them for it even though I hated it as a fan, especially in the case of Trent who played in his first SB and arguably had one of his worst games as a 49er in it. Killed a drive all by himself with penalties and then got stonewalled by a guy KC brought up from the PS on a key run play.
But like I said, I also don't blame them because the 49ers let them do it giving them all that leverage. CMC understood how critical he was to the offense and ensured he got his bump and guaranteed money, I totally understand given the position. And Trent knew he had us over a barrel as soon as we didn't draft a single OT in the draft. If anything we should've at least pretended Puni would be an OT but Trent would've seen through it anyways.
Best way to stay ahead of these deals is insulate your roster with young depth pieces so you could tell those guys "we'd love to have you here but at this cost, if you can't accept that we'll roll with the backups"
...but if you don't have any legit backups well good luck keeping up that lie. That's why Nick had us as well. Anyone recall the edges we had here without Nick?
But bringing this back to Aiyuk - I fully expected Kyle to feed BA given how things ended in 2023 and I believe he was going to change things on offense a bit more to use BA's skills and things obviously fell apart cuz of him being rusty, CMC not being out there and then BAs injury. But I also believe that Kyle wanted him here for a reason and can't see that reason changing. So now we wait.