There are 223 users in the forums

Brandon Aiyuk is a 49er! Pick #25, 2020 NFL Draft

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
If can get a 3rd and a 4th for him - get rid of him.

Not because I don't like him, but there is huge risk he will not be the same player after that injury - you know.. the player we paid 30m per year for.

It may mean going Burden in the 1st but since I like Burden a lot and he is plug and play ready to start at X I don't mind lol.

Plenty of picks to do trenches with the added 5th from Deebo and hypothetically say a 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk. Example below how it could work assuming no trades except realistic small trade back in the 1st. With the added picks can see below that can easily try and trade back again with one of those picks to accumulate more picks this year or stock up picks for next year.

Can trade back with Indy to #14 (in front of AZ as they could easily want to pair Burden with Harrison Jr) so they can secure Warren and get their pick at #80. So we'll say a 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk is at middle of each round.which is pick #81 and #118 + Deebo 5th at #148.

1. 14 - Luther Burden III WR (immediate plug/play starter replaces Aiyuk just as good and we get him right away and not wait til Thxgiving for Aiyuk to return)
2. 43 - Princely Umanmielen / Donovan Ezeraiku EDGE (high upside bookend opposite Bosa)
3. 75 - Darius Alexander DL (first beast added to rebuild our DL)
3. 80 - Savion Williams WR / Jayden Higgens WR (met with both at combine)
3. 81 - Jamaree Caldwell DL (second beast to the DL - huge NT to anchor in the middle of our wide 9 and eat up double teams and defend the run)
3. 99 - Anthony Belton OT (high upside LT replacement for Trent - can play G in the meantime if needed. Or move McKivitz inside and start Belton at RT)
4. 112 - CJ West DL (third beast to the DL - met with him at Senior Bowl - DJ Jones clone but better with more pass rush/penetration ability and good against the run)
4. 118 - Demetrius Knight LB (Greenlaw replacement)
4. 138 - RJ Harvey RB (ran a 4.45 at combine super good RB. Met with him at combine)
4. 139 - Malachi Moore S (depth and could challenge Jayir Brown as starter. Jayir insurance here in case of regression)
5. 148 - Jake Majors C (center prospect to groom and hopefully be better than Brendel asap)
6. 189 - Patrick Jenkins TL (fourth beast to the DL - underrated DL pass rusher type 290-300 lbs dominated with Tulane in that conference)
7. 228 - Kyle Williams WR (just ran a sub 4.40 40 at the combine - has really good tape at Wash St - if have to do small trade up to get him do it)
7. 255 - Nikolas Martin LB (OK State LB met with him at combine ran a fast 40 and good tackler. Now we have LB depth)

Who says no to that draft? And that's with only ONE small trade back to #14 in the 1st round + we pick up THREE WRs to replace Aiyuk and Deebo while grabbing FOUR new beasts on the DL and a top EDGE. Now WR, DL, LB, S. Only thing didn't get is a G and TE2 so sign one of each in FA middle tier to bridge to next year's draft. Plus McKivitz can move inside if we need him too since we get Belton.

Just showing how by trading Aiyuk next can go WR in 1st and even 3rd round and still address trenches and depth at other positions in a big way. Sub out Williams/Higgens in the 3rd if you want with one of the Georgia Gs Tate Ratledge/Fairchild if you want more trenches. Either way can still grab Burden in the 1st and be just fine with the added picks from Aiyuk trade.

Don't even need Aiyuk anymore and certainly won't miss him with that draft.
I absolutely say no a first round receiver is non starter for me and on top of that they add another WR at #80 no thanks.

Lol as if you didn't even look at the rest of the draft with 4 DL and 2LB an EDGE an OT a C. Also if Aiyuk is gone then we need top talent at WR just as much as DL/OL. And what if Pearsall or Jennings get hurt? We have ZERO depth with Dick and Squat behind them. We need a top WR worse than the year we traded up for Aiyuk in the 1st round. Pearsall and Jennings and a 4th rd WR are not going to cut it to compete next year.

The WR landscape has changed with no Aiyuk or Deebo. Adapt your mind to the new situation - if you are able.

Lots of ways to skin a cat to get better - clearly you do not have a creative mind - that small trade back netted us #80 so essentially got two of the best WRs in the draft for for the price of #11. Said sub out WR at #80 and grab Tuten RB that just ran 4.32 or Elijah Arroyo TE or Tate Rattledge G or Fairchild G or whatever the hell player you want. Point is we can address all of our needs in the trenches in THIS draft WHILE grabbing a WR in the 1st round IF we trade Aiyuk.
No I absolutely looked at the whole draft.

Losing Deebo nor Aiyuk necessitates using a first round pick in this draft at WR.

It has nothing to due with lack of creativity it makes no sense for a run first team to continuely invest premium draft capital & huge amounts of cap room in the receiver position.

Disagree esp. when we in this scenario have just traded our two top WRs plus we get an additional pick at #80 in the trade back to #14 which easily provides the luxury of drafting a WR at #14. You mentioned premium... well we do not have any premium WRs on our roster if Aiyuk is dealt. That is a problem. Sign Devante and things change but looks like we want to get younger and cheaper and Devante does neither.

Thing is IF we ever did go WR in the 1st round - with Aiyuk and Deebo gone it is not a luxury pick anymore. We ****ing need a premium top WR or WR prospect I'm all for it at #14 if we got Indy's #80 as well. Still THIRTEEN more picks to draft all the positions that would make you happy. But again happy to go Tre Harris in the 2nd (but I like the other positional talent there at #43 a lot better) or Savion Williams/Jayden Higgens in the 3rd (they may not be there though) .. so what do we do?

So let me ask you - how do you propose addressing the WR position and giving a premium X receiver to our QB in Brock who is coming off a regression season if the only WR options he has is Jennings and Pearsall? We are not going to compete for the Super Bowl with Jennings and Pearsall as our top two WRs and Cowing imo. And if one of them gets hurt we are done.
[ Edited by Ezekiel38 on Mar 1, 2025 at 9:56 PM ]
So the smoke maybe due to media jumping on BA's contract

The best option would be a post 6/1 Trade

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000
2025 Savings: $6,591,000

All other options in getting BA off this team would hurt us
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
So the smoke maybe due to media jumping on BA's contract

The best option would be a post 6/1 Trade

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000
2025 Savings: $6,591,000

All other options in getting BA off this team would hurt us

Rip the band aid off - a 2026 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk make the deal now and have it execute post June 1.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
So the smoke maybe due to media jumping on BA's contract

The best option would be a post 6/1 Trade

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000
2025 Savings: $6,591,000

All other options in getting BA off this team would hurt us

Is it possible they just take all the heavy cap hits this year while signing Purdy, and getting way younger with 12 draft picks etc?
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,653
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
So the smoke maybe due to media jumping on BA's contract

The best option would be a post 6/1 Trade

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000
2025 Savings: $6,591,000

All other options in getting BA off this team would hurt us

"Would hurt us" depends on the return. Few would be complaining about dead cap if they liked the trade comp. And you want 2025 picks. Not 2026.
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
So the smoke maybe due to media jumping on BA's contract

The best option would be a post 6/1 Trade

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000
2025 Savings: $6,591,000

All other options in getting BA off this team would hurt us

"Would hurt us" depends on the return. Few would be complaining about dead cap if they liked the trade comp. And you want 2025 picks. Not 2026.
when i say hurt us, i mean hurt us
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
If can get a 3rd and a 4th for him - get rid of him.

Not because I don't like him, but there is huge risk he will not be the same player after that injury - you know.. the player we paid 30m per year for.

It may mean going Burden in the 1st but since I like Burden a lot and he is plug and play ready to start at X I don't mind lol.

Plenty of picks to do trenches with the added 5th from Deebo and hypothetically say a 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk. Example below how it could work assuming no trades except realistic small trade back in the 1st. With the added picks can see below that can easily try and trade back again with one of those picks to accumulate more picks this year or stock up picks for next year.

Can trade back with Indy to #14 (in front of AZ as they could easily want to pair Burden with Harrison Jr) so they can secure Warren and get their pick at #80. So we'll say a 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk is at middle of each round.which is pick #81 and #118 + Deebo 5th at #148.

1. 14 - Luther Burden III WR (immediate plug/play starter replaces Aiyuk just as good and we get him right away and not wait til Thxgiving for Aiyuk to return)
2. 43 - Princely Umanmielen / Donovan Ezeraiku EDGE (high upside bookend opposite Bosa)
3. 75 - Darius Alexander DL (first beast added to rebuild our DL)
3. 80 - Savion Williams WR / Jayden Higgens WR (met with both at combine)
3. 81 - Jamaree Caldwell DL (second beast to the DL - huge NT to anchor in the middle of our wide 9 and eat up double teams and defend the run)
3. 99 - Anthony Belton OT (high upside LT replacement for Trent - can play G in the meantime if needed. Or move McKivitz inside and start Belton at RT)
4. 112 - CJ West DL (third beast to the DL - met with him at Senior Bowl - DJ Jones clone but better with more pass rush/penetration ability and good against the run)
4. 118 - Demetrius Knight LB (Greenlaw replacement)
4. 138 - RJ Harvey RB (ran a 4.45 at combine super good RB. Met with him at combine)
4. 139 - Malachi Moore S (depth and could challenge Jayir Brown as starter. Jayir insurance here in case of regression)
5. 148 - Jake Majors C (center prospect to groom and hopefully be better than Brendel asap)
6. 189 - Patrick Jenkins TL (fourth beast to the DL - underrated DL pass rusher type 290-300 lbs dominated with Tulane in that conference)
7. 228 - Kyle Williams WR (just ran a sub 4.40 40 at the combine - has really good tape at Wash St - if have to do small trade up to get him do it)
7. 255 - Nikolas Martin LB (OK State LB met with him at combine ran a fast 40 and good tackler. Now we have LB depth)

Who says no to that draft? And that's with only ONE small trade back to #14 in the 1st round + we pick up THREE WRs to replace Aiyuk and Deebo while grabbing FOUR new beasts on the DL and a top EDGE. Now WR, DL, LB, S. Only thing didn't get is a G and TE2 so sign one of each in FA middle tier to bridge to next year's draft. Plus McKivitz can move inside if we need him too since we get Belton.

Just showing how by trading Aiyuk next can go WR in 1st and even 3rd round and still address trenches and depth at other positions in a big way. Sub out Williams/Higgens in the 3rd if you want with one of the Georgia Gs Tate Ratledge/Fairchild if you want more trenches. Either way can still grab Burden in the 1st and be just fine with the added picks from Aiyuk trade.

Don't even need Aiyuk anymore and certainly won't miss him with that draft.
I absolutely say no a first round receiver is non starter for me and on top of that they add another WR at #80 no thanks.

Lol as if you didn't even look at the rest of the draft with 4 DL and 2LB an EDGE an OT a C. Also if Aiyuk is gone then we need top talent at WR just as much as DL/OL. And what if Pearsall or Jennings get hurt? We have ZERO depth with Dick and Squat behind them. We need a top WR worse than the year we traded up for Aiyuk in the 1st round. Pearsall and Jennings and a 4th rd WR are not going to cut it to compete next year.

The WR landscape has changed with no Aiyuk or Deebo. Adapt your mind to the new situation - if you are able.

Lots of ways to skin a cat to get better - clearly you do not have a creative mind - that small trade back netted us #80 so essentially got two of the best WRs in the draft for for the price of #11. Said sub out WR at #80 and grab Tuten RB that just ran 4.32 or Elijah Arroyo TE or Tate Rattledge G or Fairchild G or whatever the hell player you want. Point is we can address all of our needs in the trenches in THIS draft WHILE grabbing a WR in the 1st round IF we trade Aiyuk.
No I absolutely looked at the whole draft.

Losing Deebo nor Aiyuk necessitates using a first round pick in this draft at WR.

It has nothing to due with lack of creativity it makes no sense for a run first team to continuely invest premium draft capital & huge amounts of cap room in the receiver position.

Disagree esp. when we in this scenario have just traded our two top WRs plus we get an additional pick at #80 in the trade back to #14 which easily provides the luxury of drafting a WR at #14. You mentioned premium... well we do not have any premium WRs on our roster if Aiyuk is dealt. That is a problem. Sign Devante and things change but looks like we want to get younger and cheaper and Devante does neither.

Thing is IF we ever did go WR in the 1st round - with Aiyuk and Deebo gone it is not a luxury pick anymore. We ****ing need a premium top WR or WR prospect I'm all for it at #14 if we got Indy's #80 as well. Still THIRTEEN more picks to draft all the positions that would make you happy. But again happy to go Tre Harris in the 2nd (but I like the other positional talent there at #43 a lot better) or Savion Williams/Jayden Higgens in the 3rd (they may not be there though) .. so what do we do?

So let me ask you - how do you propose addressing the WR position for a QB in Brock who is coming off a regression season if the only WR options he has is Jennings and Pearsall? We are not going to compete for the Super Bowl with Jennings and Pearsall as our top two WRs and Cowing imo.
When your a run first it's an absolute luxury especially when you take into consideration that you just spent a 1st last year on a WR earmarked to replace Deebo so that departure was already planned for,this team has free agency and 11 draft picks to add to the position.

They'll be without out Aiyuk for part of the season one way or the other and there's no guarantee he contributes much of anything this year coming off injury does that also validate using a 1st at wideout?
Just take all the dead money this year.

We know the Yorks don't wanna spend more money for now. Heck we don't even know if Purdy is gonna get the extension as Lynch said that there are no guarantees for that huge contract.

We're not fighting to win a Super Bowl this next season so just get rid of Aiyuk and get younger players to build a new core.
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Ezekiel38:
If can get a 3rd and a 4th for him - get rid of him.

Not because I don't like him, but there is huge risk he will not be the same player after that injury - you know.. the player we paid 30m per year for.

It may mean going Burden in the 1st but since I like Burden a lot and he is plug and play ready to start at X I don't mind lol.

Plenty of picks to do trenches with the added 5th from Deebo and hypothetically say a 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk. Example below how it could work assuming no trades except realistic small trade back in the 1st. With the added picks can see below that can easily try and trade back again with one of those picks to accumulate more picks this year or stock up picks for next year.

Can trade back with Indy to #14 (in front of AZ as they could easily want to pair Burden with Harrison Jr) so they can secure Warren and get their pick at #80. So we'll say a 3rd and 4th for Aiyuk is at middle of each round.which is pick #81 and #118 + Deebo 5th at #148.

1. 14 - Luther Burden III WR (immediate plug/play starter replaces Aiyuk just as good and we get him right away and not wait til Thxgiving for Aiyuk to return)
2. 43 - Princely Umanmielen / Donovan Ezeraiku EDGE (high upside bookend opposite Bosa)
3. 75 - Darius Alexander DL (first beast added to rebuild our DL)
3. 80 - Savion Williams WR / Jayden Higgens WR (met with both at combine)
3. 81 - Jamaree Caldwell DL (second beast to the DL - huge NT to anchor in the middle of our wide 9 and eat up double teams and defend the run)
3. 99 - Anthony Belton OT (high upside LT replacement for Trent - can play G in the meantime if needed. Or move McKivitz inside and start Belton at RT)
4. 112 - CJ West DL (third beast to the DL - met with him at Senior Bowl - DJ Jones clone but better with more pass rush/penetration ability and good against the run)
4. 118 - Demetrius Knight LB (Greenlaw replacement)
4. 138 - RJ Harvey RB (ran a 4.45 at combine super good RB. Met with him at combine)
4. 139 - Malachi Moore S (depth and could challenge Jayir Brown as starter. Jayir insurance here in case of regression)
5. 148 - Jake Majors C (center prospect to groom and hopefully be better than Brendel asap)
6. 189 - Patrick Jenkins TL (fourth beast to the DL - underrated DL pass rusher type 290-300 lbs dominated with Tulane in that conference)
7. 228 - Kyle Williams WR (just ran a sub 4.40 40 at the combine - has really good tape at Wash St - if have to do small trade up to get him do it)
7. 255 - Nikolas Martin LB (OK State LB met with him at combine ran a fast 40 and good tackler. Now we have LB depth)

Who says no to that draft? And that's with only ONE small trade back to #14 in the 1st round + we pick up THREE WRs to replace Aiyuk and Deebo while grabbing FOUR new beasts on the DL and a top EDGE. Now WR, DL, LB, S. Only thing didn't get is a G and TE2 so sign one of each in FA middle tier to bridge to next year's draft. Plus McKivitz can move inside if we need him too since we get Belton.

Just showing how by trading Aiyuk next can go WR in 1st and even 3rd round and still address trenches and depth at other positions in a big way. Sub out Williams/Higgens in the 3rd if you want with one of the Georgia Gs Tate Ratledge/Fairchild if you want more trenches. Either way can still grab Burden in the 1st and be just fine with the added picks from Aiyuk trade.

Don't even need Aiyuk anymore and certainly won't miss him with that draft.
I absolutely say no a first round receiver is non starter for me and on top of that they add another WR at #80 no thanks.

Lol as if you didn't even look at the rest of the draft with 4 DL and 2LB an EDGE an OT a C. Also if Aiyuk is gone then we need top talent at WR just as much as DL/OL. And what if Pearsall or Jennings get hurt? We have ZERO depth with Dick and Squat behind them. We need a top WR worse than the year we traded up for Aiyuk in the 1st round. Pearsall and Jennings and a 4th rd WR are not going to cut it to compete next year.

The WR landscape has changed with no Aiyuk or Deebo. Adapt your mind to the new situation - if you are able.

Lots of ways to skin a cat to get better - clearly you do not have a creative mind - that small trade back netted us #80 so essentially got two of the best WRs in the draft for for the price of #11. Said sub out WR at #80 and grab Tuten RB that just ran 4.32 or Elijah Arroyo TE or Tate Rattledge G or Fairchild G or whatever the hell player you want. Point is we can address all of our needs in the trenches in THIS draft WHILE grabbing a WR in the 1st round IF we trade Aiyuk.
No I absolutely looked at the whole draft.

Losing Deebo nor Aiyuk necessitates using a first round pick in this draft at WR.

It has nothing to due with lack of creativity it makes no sense for a run first team to continuely invest premium draft capital & huge amounts of cap room in the receiver position.

Disagree esp. when we in this scenario have just traded our two top WRs plus we get an additional pick at #80 in the trade back to #14 which easily provides the luxury of drafting a WR at #14. You mentioned premium... well we do not have any premium WRs on our roster if Aiyuk is dealt. That is a problem. Sign Devante and things change but looks like we want to get younger and cheaper and Devante does neither.

Thing is IF we ever did go WR in the 1st round - with Aiyuk and Deebo gone it is not a luxury pick anymore. We ****ing need a premium top WR or WR prospect I'm all for it at #14 if we got Indy's #80 as well. Still THIRTEEN more picks to draft all the positions that would make you happy. But again happy to go Tre Harris in the 2nd (but I like the other positional talent there at #43 a lot better) or Savion Williams/Jayden Higgens in the 3rd (they may not be there though) .. so what do we do?

So let me ask you - how do you propose addressing the WR position for a QB in Brock who is coming off a regression season if the only WR options he has is Jennings and Pearsall? We are not going to compete for the Super Bowl with Jennings and Pearsall as our top two WRs and Cowing imo.
When your a run first it's an absolute luxury especially when you take into consideration that you just spent a 1st last year on a WR earmarked to replace Deebo so that departure was already planned for,this team has free agency and 11 draft picks to add to the position.

They'll be without out Aiyuk for part of the season one way or the other and there's no guarantee he contributes much of anything this year coming off injury does that also validate using a 1st at wideout?

I'm assuming we are trading Aiyuk in my validation of a 1st on WR IF IF IF they loved Burden/McMillan and liked him more than they even did Aiyuk when they traded up into the 1st for him. If they don't stupid to force a WR pick in the 1st just because we have no Aiyuk/Deebo.

I drafted one of the RBs in the class in DJ Harvey for depth behind CMC/Guerrendo and drafted one of the better C to challenge Brendel right away and drafted a quality OT that will play LT when Trent retires and can start at RT or LG right now. . I even said sub out the WR at #80 and put in Tate Ratledge or Dylan Fairchild the two G out of Georgia.

How does that not help address the OL for our run first offense?

Also, if we didn't go WR in the first in Burden I prefer DL/EDGE/CB/LB in the 1st round. How does drafting defense in the 1st help our run first offense?

I can flip it on you as well - this team has free agency and 13 picks to add to the run first nature of our offense and add to those positions. Plus outside of Membou we prob aren't going OL in the 1st anyways.

Point being whether we draft a WR/DL/EDGE/CB/LB/S/TE in the 1st round .. none of those help our run-first offense. So what's the difference whether we draft an elite WR or defensive position. Plus I would argue an elite WR prospect that can immediately start as your X receiver can hep our run first offense as if Brock has no premium WR targets that can get open consistently outside of Pearsall the defense will cheat up against the run all day long and Brock won't be able to make them pay as his WRs are not good enough to win. We saw Brock regress when he lost his weapons and now he's losing his top two WR weapons. Let's get him another. Get Devante to sign here and I'll lessen my desire for WR early in the draft. But Devante would cost major $$$ and York is done with that kind of spending. You don't trade Aiyuk to save cash and then give it all to Devante. A top quality X receiver costs a fortune in FA. First round of the draft is the best place to find one that is elite, young, and cheap.

Show me where else we can get that X receiver. Maybe Amari Cooper if he isn't too expensive perhaps.
[ Edited by Ezekiel38 on Mar 1, 2025 at 11:25 PM ]
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
So the smoke maybe due to media jumping on BA's contract

The best option would be a post 6/1 Trade

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000
2025 Savings: $6,591,000

All other options in getting BA off this team would hurt us

"Would hurt us" depends on the return. Few would be complaining about dead cap if they liked the trade comp. And you want 2025 picks. Not 2026.
when i say hurt us, i mean hurt us

Are you sure about this?

I'm not sure about anything related to contracts and cap space but, as I understand it, this is very similar to Deebo's case.
If the niners trade Aiyuk post-June they will have a $18,4M cap hit divided btwin this and next year. As you said:

2025 Dead Cap: $4,600,000
2026 Dead Cap: $13,800,000

this same cap hit ($18,4M) would come entirely this year if the trade is made before June. But that's all.

But then there are the "contract triggers" occurring this year before June 1st:

- April 1st: 2025 season's $4M and 2026's $16M (a total $20,875M) become fully guaranteed. If I'm not wrong (and there are ample possibilities that I'm) these almost 21M have to be accounted against the cap, one way or another.

- Also April 1st: as OTC puts it:
"Another $31 million in injury guarantees vest on April 1, 2025."

I have no clue how this 31M count against the salary cap but I guess that it has to be also accounted one way or another.
So if all the above is correct is far better to trade Aiyuk before April 1st. But I coul be so wrong,... AB81's help would be very appreciated
I'm not trading Aiyuk for pennies on the dollar. You had the tough negotiations last offseason that hurt us and he's signed. You paid him for a reason.

He's easily our best WR in years and even when rusty he was key to helping our offense. Guys come back from injuries all the time. He's only 26 years old with modern science and rehab methods.

You don't leave the team devoid of talent when this WR class isn't even very good. Would be a super reactionary and bad move to trade him.
Originally posted by genus49:
I'm not trading Aiyuk for pennies on the dollar. You had the tough negotiations last offseason that hurt us and he's signed. You paid him for a reason.

He's easily our best WR in years and even when rusty he was key to helping our offense. Guys come back from injuries all the time. He's only 26 years old with modern science and rehab methods.

You don't leave the team devoid of talent when this WR class isn't even very good. Would be a super reactionary and bad move to trade him.

I still think he could be traded if the draft comp was fair.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by genus49:
I'm not trading Aiyuk for pennies on the dollar. You had the tough negotiations last offseason that hurt us and he's signed. You paid him for a reason.

He's easily our best WR in years and even when rusty he was key to helping our offense. Guys come back from injuries all the time. He's only 26 years old with modern science and rehab methods.

You don't leave the team devoid of talent when this WR class isn't even very good. Would be a super reactionary and bad move to trade him.

I still think he could be traded if the draft comp was fair.

Last year showed our offense works without him and with Deebo being a shell of himself.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by genus49:
I'm not trading Aiyuk for pennies on the dollar. You had the tough negotiations last offseason that hurt us and he's signed. You paid him for a reason.

He's easily our best WR in years and even when rusty he was key to helping our offense. Guys come back from injuries all the time. He's only 26 years old with modern science and rehab methods.

You don't leave the team devoid of talent when this WR class isn't even very good. Would be a super reactionary and bad move to trade him.

I still think he could be traded if the draft comp was fair.

Last year showed our offense works without him and with Deebo being a shell of himself.

Our offense was far from good last year. Look at how it worked with him before and then after Aiyuk got hurt. Big drop in production from the passing offense.

If you pay him trading him now would be gross mismanagement.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone