Originally posted by frenchmov:
You can use anyone you want and if you just blindly trust everything that an NFL insider says then it is what it is.
I'm not s**tting on any reporter. Sometimes they're right or wrong, and sometimes when they're wrong it's not necessarily their fault. They are reporting what they heard from someone they trust.
In your scenario, you are saying the 49ers made aiyuk an offer in may and then literally ghosted him and his agent, presumably (?) for months.
This means you believe they made an offer, the agent contacted them to discuss said offer, and 49ers management ( INCLUDING THE GM WHO THE AGENT ALSO REPRESENTS) literally ignored the agent/would not take his call/would not respond.
This sounds.... incredibly unlikely. I don't care if Ian rappaport or schefter or pretty Rickey are reporting it. It makes zero common sense to me.
Anyhow, our opinions on it don't mean much. I'll just be glad when it's over
Hey man if you want to pick and choose what reports they give out as truthful (or not) Go ahead.
I'm saying after the initial offer there was no negotiations for months (reportedly). Why is that so hard to get? Literally every report we got from then until the moment he came and talked to the FO was…there was nothing to report because nothing was happening.
We will see where it all goes. I would have preferred if SF took care of business one way or the other before 8/29.