Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Sounds like and what is happening doesn't look like a couple of mil is what's creating this two month hold out.
as for you don't know what I'm talking about with gambling term, but you keep posting the gambling reference of "All in"?
you do know there is another side of All in right?
The two month hold in is because SF offered one deal back in May then a bunch of crickets. Sounds like they finally met and started actually negotiating.
"All in" is in reference to this yr, which clearly they are. They got guys that are basically playing on the last yr of their deal. You got older guys like Trent who aren't here for the long-haul. Paying BA isn't gonna set this franchise back years or whatever. He's a piece for now and the future because of his age and the fact that he's consistently getting better.
extending your own vs overpaying FAs who haven't been here is what can really set a team back.