⛏ SF 49ERS vs AZ CARDINALS 🌵 Gameday Thread - 2019 Season Week 11

Not many games left on our schedule that you could count as an "easy" win. Gotta take advantage of this game, the rams game, the falcons game. Must get those three because if we don't win any of the big ones

Personally, I'm ready to see how the team can do with more time to prepare and more film on the Cardinals, while also getting to play at home this time.

Oh, so you are ready to move on to the next game? I'm sure the players are as well. You can be upset, but posting in every thread about how this was the most demoralizing loss is a bit ridiculous. The team lost; they are 8-1 atop the NFC and getting ready to play another West rival. Hopefully, they have the intestinal fortitude to move on without the "Seahawks Hangover Syndrome" hyperbole.

Originally posted by 49ers90sBaby:

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:

He had a total of 40 yards yes, you minus 22 yards from that one long run and he ends up 18 yards on 8 attempts, and that my friend is only 2.2 yards per attempt. I agreed he should have had more attempts but they were stacking the box and taking away the run game. You're making it sounded like everytime he touched the ball he was gaining 4.5 yards all the time, he didn't. We needed WR playmakers to make plays when needed to but we didn't have any.

He was gaining 4 yards on almost every run though that's not bad at all. All the pressure was on Jimmy which is why they shouldn't have stopped using the rbs. A rb helps takes tremendous pressure of Jimmy.

Lol
Simple math!
He wasn't getting 4 ypc.. see post above.

But I do agree they should have kept trying to run the ball.

Was very disappointed that we didn't run any misdirection run plays, or stretch plays left, then right, slow the f**king defense down a bit. They just came off an OT win and we had rest. Very disappointing loss...

And both Staley & McG should have removed themselves from that game. That was a pathetic performance.

And again, since the both tackles were struggling so bad, why didn't Kyle give them help like he was giving help to Skule & Brunskell?

Kyle definitely drop the ball on this game.

Is Gould coming back for this game?

Two game win streak on the way. Az will be easier the second time around and GB can't stop the run once we have a healthy Kittle and Sanders from them to worry about. Guarantee next two are wins. Baltimore and New Orleans are gonna be toss ups. Defense travels well so I expect tough but very close games

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:

Originally posted by 49ers90sBaby:

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
He had a total of 40 yards yes, you minus 22 yards from that one long run and he ends up 18 yards on 8 attempts, and that my friend is only 2.2 yards per attempt. I agreed he should have had more attempts but they were stacking the box and taking away the run game. You're making it sounded like everytime he touched the ball he was gaining 4.5 yards all the time, he didn't. We needed WR playmakers to make plays when needed to but we didn't have any.

He was gaining 4 yards on almost every run though that's not bad at all. All the pressure was on Jimmy which is why they shouldn't have stopped using the rbs. A rb helps takes tremendous pressure of Jimmy.

Lol
Simple math!
He wasn't getting 4 ypc.. see post above.

But I do agree they should have kept trying to run the ball.

Was very disappointed that we didn't run any misdirection run plays, or stretch plays left, then right, slow the f**king defense down a bit. They just came off an OT win and we had rest. Very disappointing loss...

And both Staley & McG should have removed themselves from that game. That was a pathetic performance.

And again, since the both tackles were struggling so bad, why didn't Kyle give them help like he was giving help to Skule & Brunskell?

Kyle definitely drop the ball on this game.

I still wonder how vanilla and strategically Kyle was purposely keeping his game plan against Seattle in order to set them up for the game in Dec., which could (possibly) propel the 49ers into the playoffs with momentum. He's known for setting opposing teams up for an offensive attack later in a game so why not in games ahead for teams they play twice. He probably assumed (correctly or not) that without missed kicks and WR's dropping balls and Jimmy being more accurate that the 49ers could handle Seattle. And they might have. We'll never know.
I think this week against Az we will see if that's true in how he attacks Az defense which manhandled the 49ers pretty well last time. Off a short week on Halloween, the 49ers didn't look like the same team that had Carolina and the Rams reeling.
Sic 'em Kyle!

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
Is Gould coming back for this game?

He's day to day.

Bigger game than I thought it would be given the nature of the MNF loss.

Luckily, the defense only played 70 snaps.

This one is all about how the team's emotional response on a short week.

Originally posted by mutant-man49:
Two game win streak on the way. Az will be easier the second time around and GB can't stop the run once we have a healthy Kittle and Sanders from them to worry about. Guarantee next two are wins. Baltimore and New Orleans are gonna be toss ups. Defense travels well so I expect tough but very close games

uhm,, it was also said seattle could not stop the run. how did that work out. kittle maybe will play. sanders has rib issues. even if he can play. he will not be effective. the cards almost beat us last time. what makes you think it will be easier. good lord

If Kittle and sanders are out I could easily see us losing a close one. Couldn't really run on these guys the first time.... no reason to think this will be different

Adversity is good.

Originally posted by Sourball:

I still wonder how vanilla and strategically Kyle was purposely keeping his game plan against Seattle in order to set them up for the game in Dec., which could (possibly) propel the 49ers into the playoffs with momentum. He's known for setting opposing teams up for an offensive attack later in a game so why not in games ahead for teams they play twice. He probably assumed (correctly or not) that without missed kicks and WR's dropping balls and Jimmy being more accurate that the 49ers could handle Seattle. And they might have. We'll never know.
I think this week against Az we will see if that's true in how he attacks Az defense which manhandled the 49ers pretty well last time. Off a short week on Halloween, the 49ers didn't look like the same team that had Carolina and the Rams reeling.
Sic 'em Kyle!

That is an absolutely ridiculous observation. Once the season starts, you don't purposely hold back "better" plays, increasing your chance of losing because you hope to set up winning a game in the future.

You have absolutely zero idea what the future will look like, standings wise, injury wise, etc. It would be foolish to do what you suggest doing.

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
Is Gould coming back for this game?

He's day to day.

I don't know if Gould would be any better than the young kicker. He just doesn't seem the same as in previous years. I am kinda hoping the young kicker plays this Sunday and makes all his kicks. Felt bad for the guy. He did make the first 3 kicks. I really hope we blow out the Cards, but if it comes down to a last kick, it would be awesome if the kid makes it this time to propel us to victory.

Originally posted by Stanley:

Originally posted by Sourball:
I still wonder how vanilla and strategically Kyle was purposely keeping his game plan against Seattle in order to set them up for the game in Dec., which could (possibly) propel the 49ers into the playoffs with momentum. He's known for setting opposing teams up for an offensive attack later in a game so why not in games ahead for teams they play twice. He probably assumed (correctly or not) that without missed kicks and WR's dropping balls and Jimmy being more accurate that the 49ers could handle Seattle. And they might have. We'll never know.
I think this week against Az we will see if that's true in how he attacks Az defense which manhandled the 49ers pretty well last time. Off a short week on Halloween, the 49ers didn't look like the same team that had Carolina and the Rams reeling.
Sic 'em Kyle!

That is an absolutely ridiculous observation. Once the season starts, you don't purposely hold back "better" plays, increasing your chance of losing because you hope to set up winning a game in the future.

You have absolutely zero idea what the future will look like, standings wise, injury wise, etc. It would be foolish to do what you suggest doing.

good god stanley.. and people think i am nuts.. i can not add anything to what you said... its like. oh they are keeping kittle healthy for the playoffs. what the hell.,

Originally posted by hello49:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
Is Gould coming back for this game?

He's day to day.

I don't know if Gould would be any better than the young kicker. He just doesn't seem the same as in previous years. I am kinda hoping the young kicker plays this Sunday and makes all his kicks. Felt bad for the guy. He did make the first 3 kicks. I really hope we blow out the Cards, but if it comes down to a last kick, it would be awesome if the kid makes it this time to propel us to victory.

i know the kick missed and cost us but that was the least thing i was upset about monday. the kid did a good job and i can not tell you for sure that gould would have made all those kicks monday including the game winner