49ers sign LB Jayson DiManche

He was one of the main guys on Hard Knocks

Originally posted by pelos21:
Answer the question cc.

what. asking me if i am happy he is replacing trash on the roster with more trash?

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by pelos21:

Answer the question cc.

what. asking me if i am happy he is replacing trash on the roster with more trash?

Maybe this one? (From of pg1)

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

So, cc.

I count now 73 players on the roster. We need to get to 90.

Let's say we add 10 drafted, and another 5 udfa.

How do you propose we get to 90?

Originally posted by dj43:

Filling the training camp roster. Nothing wrong with competition for the 53rd spot on the roster.

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by pelos21:

Answer the question cc.

what. asking me if i am happy he is replacing trash on the roster with more trash?

Maybe this one? (From of pg1)

Originally posted by Lobo49er:

So, cc.

I count now 73 players on the roster. We need to get to 90.

Let's say we add 10 drafted, and another 5 udfa.

How do you propose we get to 90?

It's too late... You just leave him behind.

At least he's still young.

Originally posted by mayo49:

At least he's still young.

Tire kicker..

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
Name sounds white...isn't

CAUTION: Idiot zone.

Originally posted by Lobo49er:
I count now 73 players on the roster. We need to get to 90.

Let's say we add 10 drafted, and another 5 udfa.

How do you propose we get to 90?

Awww...don't confuse us with arithmetic, especially if you're going to use big numbers. We can barely count the fingers on our hands.

http://stripehype.com/2015/02/10/bengals-may-speed-rusher-jayson-dimanche/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uow37zKytc8
It looks like he's a take a flyer guy for camp. He was a raw speed rusher out of college. He'll be depth at the Leo. My friend that likes the Bengals was mad we picked him up. He always thought he had potential but that Cincy did give him a shot. He was a good special teams player minimally.

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by saniner:
He could fight for a special teams role. The more competition the better

Judging by his career he will be cut over the summer.

i am amused by the fact that the same people who ripped trent for not signing impact players are pleased as punch with the trash like this that lynch has signed. they try to put a positive spin on it by calling it more competition. more depth. more special teams and then insert a happy face image to further complete the coverup

Im just for the new guys signing people period!, Trent wouldn't even try and complete a roster , nor revamp positions-hence the bare cupboard. The signings so far have NOT been garbage in leiu of pending draft and incumbents we still have. I see a complete 180 from Trents approach, and it IS for the better. These guys we've signed thus far; have beat us in games, have SB rings/titles amongst them, fulfill depth and needs, and are overall good signings that can turn great. Nevertheless, Im glad we didn't spend all $100+ million in cap space on 3-4 players- then have the board in an uproar AGAIN on how these "new guys" don't know what theyre doing, etc..

Funny, the last time we signed a LB from Cincinnatti that played primarily ST, and got him at a bargain------hmmmmmm, DAN SKUTA !!, who we shudda kept. I say its a good signing in dat same vein, (not that he may replicate Skuta, but that its a 'non-impact' generic signing dat has potential NOT SEEN on this board !!).

Originally posted by toppdogg32:

Funny, the last time we signed a LB from Cincinnatti that played primarily ST, and got him at a bargain------hmmmmmm, DAN SKUTA !!, who we shudda kept. I say its a good signing in dat same vein, (not that he may replicate Skuta, but that its a 'non-impact' generic signing dat has potential NOT SEEN on this board !!).

Why did Skuta even happen? WE DECIDED TO KICK THE TIRES lol. Low risk,possible nice reward.

This guy is not dan skuta. Im ok with filler churn on the roster. We wont find our stars for a couple years with the useless coaching and turnstile playbooks we have had. No secret. I dont blame kyle or lynch.

Would guess he is strictly Camp Fodder with a chance of contributing on ST. We need players like that, so I have no issue with the signing if the terms were right. If there is no long term cost, what's the issue? We still need more bodies to fill out Camp roster, and he could always surprise.