Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by DrEll:
I agree man. The spin is too strong with you guys. Head coach talks about 3rd possession (UNHEARD OF IN ANY OTHER INTERVIEW WITH EVERY COACH IN THAT POSITION) and no team has made the same decision since the new OT rules have come into effect, but you guys defend it as the right call. Unbelievable…
One last thing: It is not remotely unheard of. Go and review the statistical analysis behind the decision. Understand that it was such a controversial call, more than one reporter surveyed analytics departments across the league. It is a 50/50 decision from a statistical standpoint, and the hinging factor is the possibility of a 3rd possession. Kyle's quote is right in line with this analysis.
I would have chose to kick in any case. But I'm neither dumb or dishonest enough to read that quote and think the expectation or goal was a 3rd possession.
Who else has done it ?