There are 259 users in the forums
Originally posted by IrishCrnjo:
I've seen the "let's fire the 2nd place coach" work absolutely never in professional sports. You always end up with someone worse, and that "2nd place coach who can't win" goes onto win somewhere else. Andy Reid is one example.
Originally posted by IrishCrnjo:I'm not sure many are saying fire him. I'm not saying that. But I'm criticizing his lack of crunch time management. It's really really bad, and he hasn't seemed to learn from his past. I appreciate all the successes of getting to the Super Bowl, but it's tough watching a guy make the same mistakes over and over again
I've seen the "let's fire the 2nd place coach" work absolutely never in professional sports. You always end up with someone worse, and that "2nd place coach who can't win" goes onto win somewhere else. Andy Reid is one example.
Originally posted by Afrikan:
In 2nd halves of Super Bowls (5 qtrs) Kyle's offenses have only scored 29pts
29pts in 5qtrs in the most important parts in the games. With amazing weapons all over to attack with..
7pts vs Pats
10pts vs Chiefs (0 in the 4th QTR)
12pts in 3qtrs vs the Chiefs
Originally posted by UKNiner:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
It's not. I want my coach confident in his team they will score a TD. Then if the D gives up a TD you have the ball with sudden death implications. It's stupid to not understand this concept
this.
Originally posted by Afrikan:
In 2nd halves of Super Bowls (5 qtrs) Kyle's offenses have only scored 29pts
29pts in 5qtrs in the most important parts in the games. With amazing weapons all over to attack with..
7pts vs Pats
10pts vs Chiefs (0 in the 4th QTR)
12pts in 3qtrs vs the Chiefs
Originally posted by lamontb:
I still don't get why he took the ball first in OT. Just mind boggling decisions.
Originally posted by UKNiner:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
It's not. I want my coach confident in his team they will score a TD. Then if the D gives up a TD you have the ball with sudden death implications. It's stupid to not understand this concept
this.
Originally posted by MucketyMuck:
Originally posted by UKNiner:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
It's not. I want my coach confident in his team they will score a TD. Then if the D gives up a TD you have the ball with sudden death implications. It's stupid to not understand this concept
this.
And this is why you lose.
Originally posted by lamontb:
I still don't get why he took the ball first in OT. Just mind boggling decisions.
Originally posted by captveg:If not for Shannahans failures they wouldn't have been in position to win those games in the first place.
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by captveg:If Mahomes was actually difference maker in either of those games you'd have a point but he wasn't.
Originally posted by q0c0p:
Originally posted by captveg:
He's young. Keep him here and become the next Andy Reid *HERE* rather than elsewhere.
Or he could be stuck in purgatory forever. Getting close but never there.
I'd rather keep going with guy who's young, hungry and has shown he's willing to adjust his strategies as the league changes. You knock at the door over and over and the ball will likely bounce your way eventually. Reid is proof of this. Shanahan went up against Mahomes twice and lost. This time as narrowly as possible. Mahomes will be considered the greatest QB of all time when he retires.
The grass is usually far less green on the other side.
Mahomes and Jones won those games, IMO. Made the key plays.