John Lynch - 49ers GM

Originally posted by 9erson3:
Yeah I was gonna say too many 1s. We went long enough without a 1 pick. I was leaning OL pick 11 but maybe the defensive trenches. We are in the 11 spot which doesn't happen often. We can't squander away picks for him. Another time another place..

But boy his cap hit is totally manageable

There isn't a single player in this draft that could sniff Myles jock strap. You're not squandering anything. You're getting a DPOY in his prime. This draft sucks at the top imo. There really isn't a ton blue chip prospects.

the meat of this draft imo is on day 2/3. SF has proven they're good finding players there. Those 1st rd picks haven't been home run picks overall.

Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
You give up 2 1sts for Garrett you damn as well better hit with the remaining picks for good depth and come out of nowhere starter here and there. Lack of depth and being too top heavy has been a downfall for this team

SF has shown they're better at hitting on those day2/3 picks vs reaching in the 1st. This draft isn't chock full of elite level talent at the top imo.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mitpdub:
We could only dream for a Bosa Garrett D line. Watch the Rams offer 2 firsts and he's going to LA to wreck us twice a year

.

We'll the Dodgers and Lakers seem to be able to land all the stars so why should the Rams be any different.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Alfienator:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Would you trade 2 1sts, a 3rd and a 6th for Myles a 2026 2nd and 2026 7th?

That's what Mack went for when the Bears traded for him (SF reportedly offered just as much).

Could we just get Mack now instead. Would be cost less

He ain't Myles. Mack is near the end and is closer to retirement. I would make that trade in a heartbeat. This draft doesn't have anything remotely close to him in it. This draft is all about depth and getting guys on day 2/3 imo.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mitpdub:
We could only dream for a Bosa Garrett D line. Watch the Rams offer 2 firsts and he's going to LA to wreck us twice a year

.

We'll the Dodgers and Lakers seem to be able to land all the stars so why should the Rams be any different.

This feels like a Rams move. They don't value picks like we do.
Myles is a sure thing vs the typical 50% bust rate for first rounders. If we could afford it I would, we can still extend Brock because his numbers don't really kick in until 2026.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9erson3:
Yeah I was gonna say too many 1s. We went long enough without a 1 pick. I was leaning OL pick 11 but maybe the defensive trenches. We are in the 11 spot which doesn't happen often. We can't squander away picks for him. Another time another place..

But boy his cap hit is totally manageable

There isn't a single player in this draft that could sniff Myles jock strap. You're not squandering anything. You're getting a DPOY in his prime. This draft sucks at the top imo. There really isn't a ton blue chip prospects.

the meat of this draft imo is on day 2/3. SF has proven they're good finding players there. Those 1st rd picks haven't been home run picks overall.

Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
You give up 2 1sts for Garrett you damn as well better hit with the remaining picks for good depth and come out of nowhere starter here and there. Lack of depth and being too top heavy has been a downfall for this team

SF has shown they're better at hitting on those day2/3 picks vs reaching in the 1st. This draft isn't chock full of elite level talent at the top imo.

Not gonna happen and it is not just a single 1. Probably multiple 1s (two) and maybe 2 or 3 to sweeten the deal. No way. We need to plug up the OL and use 11 on the defense trenches if need be. Has nothing to do with smelling jocks on a single player but shoring up holes on both lines. No way would I be in giving up so many picks. I doubt John either. And yeah, prime but he is 29.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mitpdub:
We could only dream for a Bosa Garrett D line. Watch the Rams offer 2 firsts and he's going to LA to wreck us twice a year

.

We'll the Dodgers and Lakers seem to be able to land all the stars so why should the Rams be any different.

He should choose SF over LA due to the taxes

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by mitpdub:
Make it happen John, trade for Myles !

Breaking: Reigning NFL Defensive Player of the Year and #Browns star Myles Garrett has requested a trade.

Exclusive statement: pic.twitter.com/LgS5YCeCnP

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) February 3, 2025

It's not going to happen. Just hope it's not the Chiefs or NFC team.

It could easily happen. 11th pick to Cleveland.

It would take more than that.

Originally posted by mitpdub:
This feels like a Rams move. They don't value picks like we do.
Myles is a sure thing vs the typical 50% bust rate for first rounders. If we could afford it I would, we can still extend Brock because his numbers don't really kick in until 2026.

We trade picks and players all the time, what you flaking about ?

the Rams imo seem to have a solid core of young DL already. They need to prepare for life after Stafford because it sounds like that's coming to an end sooner rather than later

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by mitpdub:
Make it happen John, trade for Myles !

Breaking: Reigning NFL Defensive Player of the Year and #Browns star Myles Garrett has requested a trade.

Exclusive statement: pic.twitter.com/LgS5YCeCnP

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) February 3, 2025

It's not going to happen. Just hope it's not the Chiefs or NFC team.

It could easily happen. 11th pick to Cleveland.

It would take more than that.

2 first rounders and Deebo or Aiyuk

Originally posted by mitpdub:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Alfienator:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Would you trade 2 1sts, a 3rd and a 6th for Myles a 2026 2nd and 2026 7th?

That's what Mack went for when the Bears traded for him (SF reportedly offered just as much).

Could we just get Mack now instead. Would be cost less

He ain't Myles. Mack is near the end and is closer to retirement. I would make that trade in a heartbeat. This draft doesn't have anything remotely close to him in it. This draft is all about depth and getting guys on day 2/3 imo.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by mitpdub:
We could only dream for a Bosa Garrett D line. Watch the Rams offer 2 firsts and he's going to LA to wreck us twice a year

.

We'll the Dodgers and Lakers seem to be able to land all the stars so why should the Rams be any different.

This feels like a Rams move. They don't value picks like we do.
Myles is a sure thing vs the typical 50% bust rate for first rounders. If we could afford it I would, we can still extend Brock because his numbers don't really kick in until 2026.

Anything is possible but Rams don't really need him right now. And ironically their use of their early picks was a big reason for their bounce back quickly.

They'd be wise to build up the rest of their team with those picks. Washington is a big player IMO. They need edge help and clearly have a QB who is a star that Garrett would have 0 issues with approving the trade.

garrett has some foot ankle issues. i wouldn't do more than deebo and a round 3. see if you can buy low. we need young talent we have a lot of old stars.

Originally posted by 9erson3:
Not gonna happen and it is not just a single 1. Probably multiple 1s (two) and maybe 2 or 3 to sweeten the deal. No way. We need to plug up the OL and use 11 on the defense trenches if need be. Has nothing to do with smelling jocks on a single player but shoring up holes on both lines. No way would I be in giving up so many picks. I doubt John either. And yeah, prime but he is 29.

trade 2 1sts, a 3rd and a 6th for Myles a 2026 2nd and 2026 7th. That's the same draft compensation AND the Bears had to put together a new contract.

Dude there is no OL worth drafting at 11. That's the point. What position does Myles play? That would completely revamp the DL. There is not a DT worth taking at 11.

you act like SF would have no picks after making a move like this when in reality they would have a 2nd/3rd/3 4ths/6th/7th.

go look at this draft, it is not particularly chalk full of blue chip talent. The meat and potato's of this draft is day 2/3 and we would still have 7 picks AND the best player on defense in his prime.

49ers don't need to go all out for Garrett. Much rather them trade up for a player in the draft than spend the farm on Myles Garrett who only has two years left on a contract. I'm mainly talking about Abdul Carter or Mason Graham. You wanna trade for a player, find another high caliber Left Tackle worth trading for when Trent Williams retires.

Originally posted by Alfienator:
2 first rounders and Deebo or Aiyuk

BA isn't going anywhere. Cost too much to move and they need good young WRs. Everyone spent all yr whining about WRs not separating and he does exactly that.

I'll gladly give them Deebo, a couple 1sts and swap some picks if need be.

Originally posted by Kolohe:
49ers don't need to go all out for Garrett. Much rather them trade up for a player in the draft than spend the farm on Myles Garrett who only has two years left on a contract. I'm mainly talking about Abdul Carter or Mason Graham. You wanna trade for a player, find another high caliber Left Tackle worth trading for when Trent Williams retires.

we always talk about landing the biggest of big names. reality is we aren't getting garret, carter, or graham. and we don't want those guys. to move up and get carter, you have to pay the trey price. let us not do that.

Originally posted by Kolohe:
49ers don't need to go all out for Garrett. Much rather them trade up for a player in the draft than spend the farm on Myles Garrett who only has two years left on a contract. I'm mainly talking about Abdul Carter or Mason Graham. You wanna trade for a player, find another high caliber Left Tackle worth trading for when Trent Williams retires.

Moving from 11 to 3 to get Carter is gonna cost multiple 1sts. Same to move up top 5 for Graham. Those guys aren't remotely as impactful as Garrett. They aren't in the same class as him. Dude is the definition of generational pass rusher.

You don't need an elite level OT to run this offense, just don't. Yes it's awesome to have Trent. We didn't lose all yr because of OT play. SF's DL is a disaster. Bosa can't do it all and piecing it together with guys like Floyd and random day 2/3 draft picks isn't gonna work in this scheme.

I think folks need to understand what this draft is and isn't because they're not equal every year. I wouldn't be shocked if SF doesn't have a 1st rd grade on 11 players in this draft. It's why I'm all for moving down in this draft.

go get Myles, sign Ryan Kelly in FA. Resign Dre to a one yr deal. Restructure Warner and give Kittle an extension. Push that cash down the road.

Draft a stout DT on day 2/3. They got the offensive weapons. They have the QB that can orchestrate the offense. Now they have saleh.