Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The Warriors had a plan to replace Mark Jackson and didn't get rid of him until they had a plan to replace him. I don't believe the 49ers had any plan at all for moving on from Harbaugh.
Agreed, and I really believe if they didn't have a plan to get a clear upgrade in Kerr then this whole thing wouldn't have turned out the same way this past season.
No way, Myers, Lacob and Welts know what they are doing and don't get caught flat footed. York is more like Cohan. Trade for Webber, ditch Webber for nothing because he and coach had a spat, fire coach shortly thereafter and have nothing but Gugliotta and Todd Fuller to show for it.
I understand what you're saying, though I wouldn't quite paint it black and white. Both orgs likely have some process in place to make decisions. They do their homework, discuss, and pull the trigger. The W's process is money right now. The 49ers' process did get the stadium done and acquired some HOF talent, but it's not running so hot recently. They seem to have decided that both Baalke and Harbaugh together was breaking down that process; trying to load two guns rather than just firing at one target. Now left with the shambles of that poor processing period, they rebooted it with Baalke as the main guy. Starting with this 2015 draft, we'll see what this process turns out: pee excellence or more misery. Still, that's much more than what Cohan was. Aside from hiring Nellie every now and then, his only process was to let St. Jean (and others) work really hard to stay mediocre ("how do I spend the maximum resources to get the most mediocre talent possible?"

). I'd say better comparisons to Cohan are Lew Wolff and the latter years of Al Davis. Wolff lets the internal cap dominate any long-term decision-making process. Al appeared to let gut instinct dominate any sort of process.