Originally posted by NorthBay49er:Hayne needs more playing time. Hydes going to get run into the ground at this rate
what happened to mike davis
There are 1,158 users in the forums
Originally posted by NorthBay49er:Hayne needs more playing time. Hydes going to get run into the ground at this rate
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by CityKing415:
Whoever supported the move away from Harbaugh is now eating crow. Will go down as the dumbest move in sports history.
I still say it was a situation that could only have got worse, and Harbaugh would not have had the same success at SF ever again. Too much friction with the front office. And even if this season was less problematic with Harbaugh - no guarantee since Harbaugh would not have prevented Willis/Boreland/Davis/Aldon/etc. situations - I stand by it being a downward spiral that could not be reversed. So, on that sense, better to bottom out right now than have a slow leak over the next five years.
Maybe if you go back to the 2013 NFCCG and pull out a victory it never gets to what occurred in 2014. But once 2014 happened it was a divorce in the future, no way around it.
Now, I like Tomsula, and I wanted him to succeed, but he's been dealt the worst hand any rookie coach has ever received. And THAT more than anything is why his hiring was, to quote my immediate reaction, "deflating". Gruden, Shanahan, Holmgren or any other rehash coach could have weathered the bad PR storm if only because they had won before. Gase could have handled the PR storm because he had the "guru" stigma, whether that was true or not. You have the EXACT SAME first five games of the season under any of those guys and you'd have disappointed fans, but not "we're doomed for eternity" fans.
And THAT - more than anything - is the raw deal Tomsula will get. Because fans like to be coddled into trusting coaches. They like coaches to lie to them and tell them what they want to hear, no matter if its true or not ("We will run the West Coast Offense" - Harbaugh lie right off the bat, and yet very few dare to call him on it because he got Ws with Schemblechler offense anyway). And Tomsula doesn't inspire the fanbase, and in todays world that matters more than anything, because first impressions are everything, and you don't get the luxury of going 2-14 like Walsh did if you can't pull off the charisma and inspire optimism during a 2-14 season like a Walsh or a Jimmy Johnson did.
Originally posted by SofaKing:
It's truly amazing some fans are unable to grasp this concept.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I gotta disagree with a rookie HC having been dealt a bad hand. I'm not sure if you remember the Dennis Erickson situation, he had far less talent to work with in 2003, then in 2004 Donahue dismantled the team even more WITHOUT any salary cap room.
People can feel sorry for Tomsula all they want but at least this team is in good shape salary cap wise with 10 times more talent than what Erickson EVER had.
We really miss him! f**k!!Originally posted by RishikeshA:Damn that Aldon Smith, he could've taken over this game.
Originally posted by OhioRedwood:
Originally posted by SofaKing:
It's truly amazing some fans are unable to grasp this concept.
Actually... I feel the D did about as well as they could. It's not a GOOD team. They kept it close on the road. I thought Lynch played well. Got pressure. Tackling.. was not real good. Blocking,in general.. better than recent disasters. Kaep was not real good but was BETTER. Until the end, the Niners were close enough to win.That says they at least were WORKING at it.
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I gotta disagree with a rookie HC having been dealt a bad hand. I'm not sure if you remember the Dennis Erickson situation, he had far less talent to work with in 2003, then in 2004 Donahue dismantled the team even more WITHOUT any salary cap room.
People can feel sorry for Tomsula all they want but at least this team is in good shape salary cap wise with 10 times more talent than what Erickson EVER had.
2003 team was pretty good on a paper. It was still a veteran team. Virtually the same roster that went 12-4 and 10-6 in 2001/2002. They had no business going 7-9, Erickson grossly mismanaged them imo. That, and the special teams was putrid. Jose Cortez and Owen Pochman #neverforget![]()
I agree we have more talent than a 1-4 team, but right now most of the blame falls on Mangini's defense, and Kap's mental demons. Ultimately, Tomsula will get blame because he's the head guy. It's his responsibility to kick people into shape during the week. It was nice to see the offense bounce back, but Mangini's defense has been a trainwreck. Something needs to be done about that, and it falls on Tomsula. When the DC stubbornly doesn't made the proper changes, the HC needs to make it right.
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Perfect outcome. Team played hard, Kap showed signs of improvement, and we improved our draft position. Having no pass rush whatsoever is a problem on defense, but we knew that going into the season.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
2003 team wasn't his team, Garcia wasn't his QB. Not to mention the feud Garcia and Owens had, who could coach a team like that.
And I agree 100% about the bold, the defense needs some tweaking and help......Dwight Freeney anyone!!!!
Originally posted by mayo49:
Glad to see Kap make some routine throws. Hopefully, he keeps it going.
Originally posted by Niners99:
Im glad the offense got back on track tonight. After last week it wouldve been easy for the D to grumble about the offense letting us down. Now the D let the offense down. I suppose for team morale its better that they take turns sucking, so one half of the team doesn't start despising the other half.