Originally posted by thl408:
I never said anything about rankings or other stats. I'm talking about PFF ratings and how people use them to compare players to one another, something you 'have no problem with'. You mention context and that's exactly what I'm getting at. The huge context that is missing when using PFF ratings to compare players that don't play on the same team, that don't go head up against the same opponents. If you want to use PFF ratings to compare players to one another, go for it. Just wanted to point out a glaring context that is missing - quality of competition.
Still have no problem because I'm not looking for a bible of rankings. PFF "rates" the players by placing them in "ranking order." Not sure what you find difficult about my point of view? I find it fun to analyze, dissect and put into context...evidently you don't.
At no time do I say..."Hey, look at those ratings/ankings on PFF...aren't the great? I've included the need for context in most of my posts...if not all.
This discussion started with my criticism of PFF's lack of context and now you are pointing out to me the need for context? OK...

You took one of my statements...wait for it...out of context of the conversation and seem to think I am using these ratings/rankings as meaningful on their own. Once again...OK