Originally posted by Blindfury:Originally posted by NCommand:I wonder if the team will ask him to restructure like Alex had to and prove his worth from backup to earning a starter job/contact again.
Otherwise, there won't be a fair competition when one guy is making $11.9M and the other, 6 times less.
CK will certainly be given the ball and would have to really tank to lose it.
Alex had proven nothing at the time of the restructure. Give me a break. The money means nothing. I don't get why it's such a big deal. Is it keeping the team from improving? Did the team do anything with the extra cap space they had this season? The money is just a way for some haters to justify in their minds that Kaep has to go.
So basically 9ers: "Hey Kaep, we're going to pay you less than the open market value so we can sign other players to improve the team. We won't sign anyone, give you a crap line, a crap HC, get you injured because of their incompetence, leak a bunch of BS stories about you and then ask you to restructure even though your salary isn't keeping us from signing anyone" C'mon.
Did you just imply $11.9M in cap space means nothing? Ummm...what? That is a VERY significant amount of space. We didn't have extra space last year as Baalke was gearing up to pay Aldon $90M and Anthony Davis hadn't of quit yet. Torrey Smith was about all we could muster for quality signings.
The fact that the FO has not communicated once to CK during this entire hiring process also speaks volumes.
Most here don't HATE CK by any means but are objective enough to look at teams needs over the love for just him.
From a FO perspective, they may be looking at Gabbert as a slightly better option at 1/6th the cost. That's just business. Nothing more.
Sure we're in position to afford a $12M backup (worst case scenario).
But if they are serious about signing some big names at RDE, OLB and WR or CB, that cap disappears really quickly.
I think your LOVE for CK is trumping a potential business decision. One that may be best for the team.
Also, don't forget CK signed a "prove it" contract. Every year he either proves it and earns maximum money or we can cut him. Asking him now, AFTER he was benched, to restructure down to a more cap friendly but more secure contact, isn't unreasonable. It's smart business.
[ Edited by NCommand on Jan 16, 2016 at 5:26 PM ]