Full 2026 San Francisco 49ers Schedule Revealed →

There are 381 users in the forums

49ers Offensive Line

Shop Find 49ers gear online
May 1, 2025 at 9:19 AM
[tweet
{
May 1, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on
May 1, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark
May 1, 2025 at 10:46 AM
Originally posted by 49ers808:
lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

Completely agree. I dont think it was completely intentional. You rank your board out and hope you get good value at OL, but this was a weak class. And strong DT class. So thats the way the cookie crumbles.

Had Banks been there at 11, had Connerly or Donovan Jackson been at 43, had Belton or Ratledge made it to 75 maybe its a slightly different tune. But in the back of their mind they know (assuming good health, assuming good play, assuming they all come out) Banks is probably the 6th or 7th best tackle had he come out with the 2026 class. And whether its from draft position or with our draft capital to move up, we will have the opportunity to get someone next year with a better draft grade than anyone we had a shot at in this draft.
May 1, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

If McK plays like he did in the second half of last season, then he's fine and definitely a bargain.
May 1, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

If McK plays like he did in the second half of last season, then he's fine and definitely a bargain.
I see no chance they pay Mckivitz considering what lesser players received on the open market this offseason.
May 1, 2025 at 11:36 AM
  • 91til
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,204
Random but is Hennessy an IOL as well? Suddenly seems like we have pretty decent depth in there.

LG Bartch, Burford, Colby
C Brendel, Nugent
RG Puni, Hennessy(?), Moss
May 1, 2025 at 12:49 PM
  • dj43
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 38,148
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

If McK plays like he did in the second half of last season, then he's fine and definitely a bargain.

He will be a bargain in the $15 million/yr range...
May 1, 2025 at 12:54 PM
  • dj43
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 38,148
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

If McK plays like he did in the second half of last season, then he's fine and definitely a bargain.
I see no chance they pay Mckivitz considering what lesser players received on the open market this offseason.

It will depend entirely on how they see the draft and where we pick.

Starting offensive tackles get paid. There are currently 15 RTs earning $11/yr, with a couple of extensions likely this year that will increase that number. (overthecap)
May 4, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

What about 2024.
May 4, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

Lots to pass on. There still UDFA from 2022 to choose from.
May 4, 2025 at 9:25 AM
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

If McK plays like he did in the second half of last season, then he's fine and definitely a bargain.
I see no chance they pay Mckivitz considering what lesser players received on the open market this offseason.

It will depend entirely on how they see the draft and where we pick.

Starting offensive tackles get paid. There are currently 15 RTs earning $11/yr, with a couple of extensions likely this year that will increase that number. (overthecap)

Based on his overall play and 49ers tendencies around the OL they should not sign him.
May 4, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
[tweet
{

many names for us to pass on

lol. I'm likely in the minority but I do think that the '26 class is the reason we passed on this one. I also think we will be forced to draft for need (they do it anyways) because I can't see us paying McKivitz and Trent is always a question mark

If McK plays like he did in the second half of last season, then he's fine and definitely a bargain.
I see no chance they pay Mckivitz considering what lesser players received on the open market this offseason.

It will depend entirely on how they see the draft and where we pick.

Starting offensive tackles get paid. There are currently 15 RTs earning $11/yr, with a couple of extensions likely this year that will increase that number. (overthecap)

Based on his overall play and 49ers tendencies around the OL they should not sign him.
The fact that they've got similar production out of Mckivitz for a fraction of the cost of what the Broncos paid McGlinchey I tend to agree with you.
May 4, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Lots to pass on. There still UDFA from 2022 to choose from.

Touché

Originally posted by DaleGribble:
The fact that they've got similar production out of Mckivitz for a fraction of the cost of what the Broncos paid McGlinchey I tend to agree with you.

Absolutely! The amount of money that average OL get paid in FA is just as absurd as the amount of money that average QBs get paid.
May 5, 2025 at 6:13 PM

If he improves another year, hes going to be getting a pay raise and its most likely not going to be us.
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Instagram
Threads
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone