I know Niners fans are protective of Willis' legacy, but saying Borland isn't close to Willis in his prime is ridiculous. Feels similar to what Young went through when he took over for Montana. Maybe we can watch his first full season starting before saying he "can't" be as good as Willis was. For comparison, here is Willis' rookie season with 16 starts vs. Borland's with 8. Borland had twice as many stuffed plays, same passes defensed, same number of turnovers...in half the play time. There are certainly areas he needs to be improve (like all players), but let's not pretend he's just some above average player.
As far as the rest Marvin, I agree with nearly everything you said. I think people are mostly so upset just because of the amount of long time players we lost in such a short time, and that's clouding up reality. Look at the talent we've seen in just the last couple years that would've been cast off had we played it "safe" and re-signed players we lost.
Sopoaga - Williams/Dorsey
Goldson - Reid
Whitner - Bethea
Rogers & Brown - Johnson/Brock/Cox
Willis - Borland
Goodwin - Kilgore
Smith - Kaep
Brooks - Lynch
Crabtre - Torrey Smith
Other than Willis - Borland I think it's pretty clear that the replacement is better than the player we lost. We've got exciting prospects waiting in the wing too with Marcus Martin, Brandon Thomas, Carradine, Dial, Hyde, Acker/Reaser/Millard, Other than the unknowns with our coaching staff, it's tough for me to be anything but optimistic about the future. This team is still absolutely loaded.
[ Edited by Disp on Mar 12, 2015 at 11:16 AM ]