Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Originally posted by jonesadrian:
Right. Also another thing we need to take into account is he was able to get so many of those tackles because there wasn't another playmaker at his position to eat up those stats. wihoite is not a starter.. well he is a starter but not by our standards at the position he's a great backup
you can get the monster numbers when nobody is there to stop you from getting it because they make the same plays that you make
its not a knock
willis a hof player and there's no reason to replace him with someone who is unproven
yes borland is unproven
the only thing that can make him proven is time.
willis has done his time he is a sure thing we know there is no slump coming we know what he can do.
Agree completely. Add in the fact that NaVorro is just right there with Patrick and...
Except that Willis has been playing through the free OL for the past 4 years and Bowman/Borland get to play around them. It is a very real technical and schematic difference in responsibilities that doesn't go away because the money makes more sense. You have to be built and/or wired differently to do what Pat does. Borland isn't built for it, and Bowman has not shown that he's wired for it. Why in the WORLD would you deal Pat without knowing whether on e of those guys could play strong side as effectively? Beyond that, wouldn't you want to see if Borland can fix his recently exposed deficiencies in coverage before shipping Pat away?
