Originally posted by ChipDouglas510:
I never thought this A.Smith would divide the fanbase too
There are 637 users in the forums
Originally posted by ChipDouglas510:
I never thought this A.Smith would divide the fanbase too
Originally posted by VANiner:
Originally posted by rondoman:I applaud you for putting that together so quickly. My recollection of those instances are that DUI played no role in their suspensions. I actually think there was internet footage of Pac-Man punching a woman in the face. Different story than what we are dealing with here. I don't think DUI falls into the category above and also don't think I can remember anyone being suspended for DUI. Now if you want to play the totality of his past conduct card, that may be different. Perhaps this last accusation of DUI tips the scales toward suspension, but in reality, look at what his past behavior really has been: 1. He was the VICTIM of a stabbing at his own house; 2. He was the PASSENGER in a vehicle that rolled over (regardless of that driver was DUI); 3. He was convicted of RECKLESS DRIVING; and 4. He is the defendant in a CIVIL suit where someone decided to sue the richest guys at the party they got shot at. Based on that, I think the NFL waits on this one.
Originally posted by VANiner:
Name a few for me. I'm not saying it has never happened, because I honestly don't know. I certainly can't recall an instance where someone was suspended for DUI prior to a conviction. I think a major part of the collective bargaining agreement limits sweeping actions the league can take based on less than a conviction. But I could be wrong, so educate me.
In April of 2007, Roger Goodell announced the implementation of his Personal Conduct Policy, suspending Pac-Man Jones for a full season and Chris Henry for eight games. That policy extended beyond requiring a criminal conviction, where any event that embarrassed or affected the league's reputation could be punished, even if the player was ultimately not punished by the law. In announcing it, Goodell laid out his thoughts:
"Illegal or irresponsible conduct does more than simply tarnish the offender. It puts innocent people at risk, sullies the reputation of others involved in the game, and undermines public respect and support for the NFL."While criminal activity is clearly outside the scope of permissible conduct, and persons who engage in criminal activity will be subject to discipline, the standard of conduct for persons employed in the NFL is considerably higher. It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. Instead, as an employee of the NFL or a member club, you are held to a higher standard and expected to conduct yourself in a way that is responsible, promotes the values upon which the league is based, and is lawful."Persons who fail to live up to this standard of conduct are guilty of conduct detrimental and subject to discipline, even where the conduct itself does not result in conviction of a crime."
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Originally posted by ChipDouglas510:
I never thought this A.Smith would divide the fanbase too
![]()
Originally posted by BrianGO:
I understand that, and I agree, but in all reality, money talks.
Would you listen to someone who makes less money than you, if they were giving advice about your career and future? Probably not. Unless they were already a close friend, and no, NFL teammates are not automatically "close friends".
The fair/unfair reality is, money, accolades etc, determine who the team leaders are. Aldon has more money and accolades than Boone.
Someone like Willis or Justin Smith, are probably people he is more likely to listen to.
Originally posted by 49ersking:
It seems like a double standard. If it was a lesser known or talented player, the 49ers would have most likely had their own disciplinary action. No one knows for sure.
There is the game, and then there are the bigger consequences of drunk diving. The law is there for a reason.
I just hope we win on Sunday!
Originally posted by real9erfan:
Apparently under the CBA, the NFL has exclusive jurisdiction over drug violations, PED's, and personal conduct. If the 49ers were to suspend Aldon, the NFLPA I guess could file a grievance against the 49ers for infringing on the NFL's powers. We'll see how this all plays out.
Originally posted by real9erfan:Apparently under the CBA, the NFL has exclusive jurisdiction over drug violations, PED's, and personal conduct. If the 49ers were to suspend Aldon, the NFLPA I guess could file a grievance against the 49ers for infringing on the NFL's powers. We'll see how this all plays out.
Originally posted by real9erfan:
Apparently under the CBA, the NFL has exclusive jurisdiction over drug violations, PED's, and personal conduct. If the 49ers were to suspend Aldon, the NFLPA I guess could file a grievance against the 49ers for infringing on the NFL's powers. We'll see how this all plays out.
Originally posted by susweel:
I swear sometimes some "niner fans" on this site make me sick. They want to see their own players get suspended. un real![]()
![]()